Global Mobility of Scientists in the Era of Big Science：A Content Analysis on the Selected Articles in Web of Sciences’ Journals

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.08.004

Abstract

Abstract:

In the era of Big Science, the global mobility of scientists has taken on new landscapes. Through a content analysis of selected literature from the Web of Science (WoS), this study provides a synthesized examination of the relationship between Big Science and global scientific mobility, the characteristics of scientists’ global mobility, and its influencing factors. The interplay between Big Science and global scientific mobility is bidirectional: on the one hand, Big Science reinforces global science governance, accelerates the transnational movement of scientists, and expands the spatial scope of mobility by fostering global knowledge networks; on the other hand, scientific mobility enhances research efficiency and quality. Global scientific mobility exhibits distinct characteristics across three dimensions––temporal, spatial, and interpersonal networks. The factors shaping this mobility include pull factors, push factors, personal factors, and intervening obstacles.

Key words: Big Science, global scientists, talent mobility, international research

Mei Li, Wenjie Ruan. Global Mobility of Scientists in the Era of Big Science：A Content Analysis on the Selected Articles in Web of Sciences’ Journals[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2025, 43(8): 51-65.

Figures/Tables 2

文献分类		内容分布
基于大规模的数据集	大规模调查数据（6篇）	美国有关科学和工程学术研究人员全国性调查（Melkers & Kiopa, 2010; Veugelers, 2010）、欧洲国家高等教育机构国际化的微观数据集（Lepori et al., 2015）和项目调查（Cañibano et al., 2020)、《2022“理想之城”全球高水平科学家分析报告》调研（上海市科学学研究所, 2022）、《2023财年H-1B专业职业工作者特征报告》（U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2024）
	出版物数据库（16篇）	WoS数据库为主（Sugimoto et al., 2017; Ferreira et al., 2021; Vega-Muñoz et al., 2021; Söderström, 2023）
		Scopus数据库为主（Cao et al., 2020; Aman, 2020; Paraskevopoulos et al., 2021; Liu & Hu, 2022; Aman, 2022; 温馨 & 康海霞, 2022; Kwiek, 2023）
		Medline数据库为主（Verginer & Riccaboni, 2020; Verginer & Riccaboni, 2021）
		其他数据库为主（Dubois et al., 2014; Börner et al., 2021; Ferrer-Serrano et al., 2021）
	官方机构数据（6篇）	教职人员聘用网络数据（He et al., 2019）、意大利学术系统（Abramo et al., 2019）、俄罗斯科学与高等教育部联合监测（Vasilyeva et al., 2022）、比利时弗拉芒区大学（Seeber et al., 2023）、ORCID公开数据集和世界银行（Ren et al., 2024）、诺贝尔奖官方网站（Gao et al., 2024）
基于履历与问卷	学者职业历史数据为主（6篇）	生命科学家（Azoulay et al., 2017）、俄罗斯国家研究型高等经济大学研究人员（Kotsemir et al., 2022）、中国千人计划（Liu et al., 2023）、诺贝尔奖获得者（侯纯光等，2024; 侯纯光等，2025）、全球高被引科学家（邓侨侨, 2014）
基于履历与问卷	问卷调查为主（6篇）	葡萄牙三个不同学科领域科学家（Fontes et al., 2013）、日本生物科学教授（Lawson & Shibayama, 2015）、基于GlobSci调查数据（Scellato et al., 2015; Stephan et al., 2016）、国家科研团队（Franzoni et al., 2018; Van Holm et al., 2019）
基于概念、理论建构	理论建构为主（5篇）	迁移推拉理论（Lee, 1966）、科学生产共同体与社会结构（Gläser, 2006）、科学活动中心形成的历史地理基础理论框架（孙俊等, 2011）、移民动因理论（章雅荻，余潇枫, 2020）、智力迁移概念（Li et al., 2023）
基于概念、理论建构	批判性理论分析为主（5篇）	多元知识体系建构（Santos, 2007）、高等教育空间建构（Marginson, 2022b）、全球科学发展的四种主导叙事（Marginson, 2022c）、对于世界体系理论的批判（Marginson & Xu, 2023）数据和理论的历史综合解释方法（Marginson, 2022a）
基于综述性和解释性文章	文献综述与政策分析性评论为主（12篇）	国际大科学计划与大科学工程研究（Meyer & Schroeder, 2015; 梁思琪, 2022）、科学家流动评论（Wolinsky, 2009; Larner, 2015; Costa & Sengupta, 2021）、科学家跨国流动的多维意义（Hunter, 2013; Netz et al., 2020）、欧洲研究区科学项目资金与支持管理（De Almeida Pereira, 2016）、科学移民政策与法律法规（Yurevich et al., 2019; Davletgildeev & Tsygankova, 2020; Piccoli et al., 2023）、多国视角下的学术流动性（Carlson & Martin-Rovet, 1995）
基于综述性和解释性文章	访谈为主（3篇）	青年千人计划学者的半结构访谈（Li et al., 2018）、俄罗斯和欧洲青年学者的焦点小组访谈（Deriglazova, 2019）、美国国际学生和博士后访谈（Gewin, 2020）
基于官方报道与信息（8篇）		欧盟委员会（European Commission, 2021; 2024; 2025）、美国公共广播电台报道（Stein, 2025; Stone et al., 2025）、美国国务院网站信息（U.S. Department of State, 2011）、德国联邦政府信息（Die Bundesregierung, 2023）、欧洲核子研究中心ATLAS项目报告（CERN, 2019）

References

	邓侨侨. (2014). 机构迁移: 高被引科学家名校集聚的特征与原因分析. 科学学与科学技术管理, 35 (08), 135- 143.
	侯纯光, 杜德斌, 刘承良. (2024). 全球顶尖科学家成长的空间路径选择与区域角色. 地理学报, 79 (12), 3142- 3160.
	侯纯光, 杜德斌, 覃雄合, 等. (2025). 全球顶尖科学家跨国流动与世界科学中心的时空格局演化——基于诺贝尔自然科学类获奖者的分析. 地理研究, 44 (02), 321- 341.
	梁思琪. (2022). 我国参与及发起国际大科学计划相关研究综述. 今日科苑, (01), 22- 32.
	孙俊, 潘玉君, 贾星客, 等. (2011). 科学活动中心形成的历史地理基础. 科学学与科学技术管理, 32 (11), 14- 20.
	上海市科学学研究所. (2022). 《2022“理想之城”全球高水平科学家分析报告》, 载于文汇报. (2022-08-27). 上海高水平科学家十年增长近3倍!2022“理想之城”报告: 京沪跻身全球最主要人才枢纽城市. https://wenhui.whb.cn/third/jinri/202208/27/482832.html.
	温馨, 康海霞. (2022). 全球科研人员流动整体格局及中国流动特征研究. 今日科苑, (11), 79- 92.
	章雅荻, 余潇枫. (2020). 国际移民视阈下移民动因理论再建构. 国际观察, (01), 119- 137.
	Abramo, G., D’ Angelo, C. A. & Di Costa, F. (2019). The collaboration behavior of top scientists. Scientometrics, 118 (1), 215- 232.
	Aman, V. (2020). Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types. Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (2), 565- 581.
	Aman, V. (2022). Internationally mobile scientists as knowledge transmitters: A lexical-based approach to detect knowledge transfer. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73 (10), 1418- 1431.
	Azoulay, P., Ganguli, I., & Zivin, J. G. (2017). The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants. Research Policy, 46 (3), 573- 590.
	Börner, K., Silva, F. N., & Milojević, S. (2021). Visualizing big science projects. Nature Reviews Physics, 3 (11), 753- 761.
	Cao, C., Baas, J., Wagner, C. S., et al. (2020). Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. Science and Public Policy, 47 (2), 172- 183.
	Cañibano, C., D’Este, P., Otamendi, F. J., et al. (2020). Scientific careers and the mobility of European researchers: An analysis of international mobility by career stage. Higher Education, 80 (6), 1175- 1193.
	Carlson, T. & Martin-Rovet, D. (1995). The implications of scientific mobility between France and the United States. Minerva, 33 (3), 211- 250.
	CERN ATLAS Experiment. Collaboration at the frontiers of science and technology. (2019, April). Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://cds.cern.ch/record/2625321/files/CERN-Brochure-2018-012-Eng.pdf.
	Costa, K. M., & Sengupta, A. (2021). Short-term scholar visas are essential for science. Neuropsychopharmacology, 46 (2), 277- 278.
	Davletgildeev, R., & Tsygankova, S. (2020). Researchers’ mobility as a manifestation of integrated legal regulation in Europe. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4, 240- 260.
	De Almeida Pereira, C. A. F. (2016). Transnational cooperation in the European Research Area: Opportunities and challenges from the management of scientific research funding initiatives. Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal).
	Deriglazova, L. V. (2019). International academic mobility: Motivation and adaptation problems of young scientists from Russia and Europe. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Istoriya-Tomsk State University Journal of History, 59, 142- 149.
	Die Bundesregierung. (2023, November 15). Europäische Forschungszusammenarbeit stärken. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/eu-forschungszusammenarbeit-2235608.
	Dubois, P., Rochet, J., & Schlenker, J. (2014). Productivity and mobility in academic research: Evidence from mathematicians. Scientometrics, 98 (3), 1669- 1701.
	European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2021, March 10). Horizon Europe, the EU research and innovation programme (2021-27) – For a green, healthy, digital and inclusive Europe, Publications Office of the European Union.
	European Commission. (2024, December 11). Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions: About MSCA. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://marie-sklodowska-curie-actions.ec.europa.eu/about-msca.
	European Commission. (2025, March 3). Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions: Postdoctoral Fellowships. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://marie-sklodowska-curie-actions.ec.europa.eu/actions/postdoctoral-fellowships.
	Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M. P. & Fuentelsaz, L. (2021). The European research landscape under the Horizon 2020 lenses: The interaction between science centers, public institutions, and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46 (3), 828- 853.
	Ferreira, M. , Bascur, J. P. , & Costas, R. (2021). Scholars mobility and its impact on the knowledge producers’ workforce of European regions. 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI2019), Vol II.
	Fontes, M., Videira, P. & Calapez, T. (2013). The impact of long-term scientific mobility on the creation of persistent knowledge networks. Mobilities, 8 (3), 440- 465.
	Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2018). Context factors and the performance of mobile individuals in research teams. Journal of Management Studies, 55 (1), 27- 59.
	Gao, Q., Wei, N., Zhang, Q., et al. (2024). Visualising the academic mobility of Nobel laureates. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51 (8), 1984- 1986.
	Gewin, V. (2020). The visa woes that shattered scientists’ American dreams. Nature, 586 (7828), 323- 325.
	Gläser, J. (2006). Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: Die soziale Ordnung der Forschung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt.
	He, Z., Zhen, N., & Wu, C. (2019). Measuring and exploring the geographic mobility of American professors from graduating institutions: Differences across disciplines, academic ranks, and genders. Journal of Informetrics, 13 (3), 771- 784.
	Hunter, P. (2013). Brain drain, brain gain or brain sharing? EMBO Reports, 14(4), 315–318.
	Kotsemir, M. , Dyachenko, E. & Nefedova, A. (2022). Mobile young researchers and their non-mobile “twins”: Who is winning the academic race? Scientometrics, 127(12), 7307–7332.
	Kwiek, M. (2023). The Globalization of Science: The increasing power of individual scientists, in Mattei, P. , Dumay, X. , Mangez, E. , & Behrend, J. (Eds. ). The Oxford Handbook of Education and Globalization, Oxford University Press.
	Larner, W. (2015). Globalising knowledge networks: Universities, diaspora strategies, and academic intermediaries. Geoforum, 59, 197- 205.
	Lawson, C., & Shibayama, S. (2015). International research visits and careers: An analysis of bioscience academics in Japan. Science and Public Policy, 42 (5), 690- 710.
	Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3 (1), 47- 57.
	Lepori, B., Seeber, M., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2015). Competition for talent: Country and organizational-level effects in the internationalization of European higher education institutions. Research policy, 44 (3), 789- 802.
	Li, M., Yang R., & Wu, J. (2018). Translating transnational capital into professional development: A study of China’s Thousand Youth Talents Scheme scholars. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19 (2), 229- 239.
	Liu, M., & Hu, X. (2022). Movers’ advantages: The effect of mobility on scientists’ productivity and collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 16 (3), 101311.
	Li, W., Lo, L., & Lu, Y. (2023). Introduction: The intellectual migration analytics. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49 (18), 4577- 4597.
	Liu, Y. , Huang, C. , Zhang, F. , et al. (2023). Locational preferences of high‐level overseas talent returning to China: Evidence from microdata analysis. Population, Space and Place, 29(5), e2650.
	Marginson, S. (2022a). Global science and national comparisons: Beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics. Comparative Education, 58 (2), 125- 146.
	Marginson, S. (2022b). Space and scale in higher education: the glonacal agency heuristic revisited. Higher Education, 84 (6), 1365- 1395.
	Marginson, S. (2022c). What drives global science? The four competing narratives. Studies in Higher Education, 47 (8), 1566- 1584.
	Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and inequality in global science: Problems of the center-periphery model. Comparative Education Review, 67 (1), 31- 52.
	Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27 (4), 389- 414.
	Meyer, E. T. , & Schroeder, R. (2015). Knowledge machines: Digital transformations of the sciences and humanities. In the MIT Press eBooks.
	Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., et al. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143.
	Netz, N., Hampel, S., & Aman, V. (2020). What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 29 (3), 327- 351.
	Paraskevopoulos, P., Boldrini, C., Passarella, A., et al. (2021). The academic wanderer: structure of collaboration network and relation with research performance. Applied Network Science, 6 (1), 31.
	Piccoli, L., Dzankic, J., Ruedin, D., et al. (2023). Restricting human movement during the COVID-19 pandemic: New research avenues in the study of mobility, migration, and citizenship. International Migration Review, 57 (2), 505- 520.
	Ren, J., Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2024). Exploring the push and pull factors in scientific mobility. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 14559- 14570.
	Santos, B de Sousa. (2007). Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 30 (1), 45- 89.
	Scellato, G., Franzoni, C., & Stephan, P. (2015). Migrant scientists and international networks. Research Policy, 44 (1), 108- 120.
	Seeber, M., Debacker, N., Meoli, M., et al. (2023). Exploring the effects of mobility and foreign nationality on internal career progression in universities. Higher Education, 85 (5), 1041- 1081.
	Söderström, K. R. (2023). Global reach, regional strength: Spatial patterns of a big science facility. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74 (9), 1140- 1156.
	Stone, W. , Huang, P. , & Stein, R. (2025, February 14). Staff at CDC and NIH are reeling as Trump administration cuts workforce. NPR. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/02/14/nx-s1-5297913/cdc-layoffs-hhs-trump-doge.
	Stephan, P., Franzoni, C., & Scellato, G. (2016). Global competition for scientific talent: Evidence from location decisions of PhDs and postdocs in 16 countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25 (3), 457- 485.
	Sugimoto, C. R., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D. S., et al. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature, 550 (7674), 29- 31.
	Stein, R. (2025, February 22). NIH funding freeze stalls applications on $1.5 billion in medical research funds. NPR. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/02/22/nx-s1-5305276/trump-nih-funding-freeze-medical-research.
	Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169 (7), 467- 473.
	U. S. Department of State. (2011). Networks of diasporas in engineering and science (NODES). Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://2009-2017.state.gov/e/stas/c57937.htm.
	U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2024, March 6). Characteristics of H-1B specialty occupation workers. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/reports/OLA_Signed_H-1B_Characteristics_Congressional_Report_FY2023.pdf.
	Van Holm, E. J., Wu, Y., & Welch, E. W. (2019). Comparing the collaboration networks and productivity of China-born and US-born academic scientists. Science and Public Policy, 46 (2), 310- 320.
	Vasilyeva, I. N. , Pokrovsky, D. S. , Demidov, A. V. , et al. (2022). Methodology for assessing regional specifics of interaction between foreign scientists and Russian scientific organizations and universities. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 34–54.
	Vega-Muñoz, A., Gónzalez-Gómez-Del-Miño, P., & Espinosa-Cristia, J. F. (2021). Recognizing new trends in brain drain studies in the framework of global sustainability. Sustainability, 13 (6), 3195.
	Veugelers, R. (2010). Towards a multipolar science world: Trends and impact. Scientometrics, 82 (2), 439- 456.
	Verginer, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2020). Cities and countries in the global scientist mobility network. Applied Network Science, 5 (1), 38.
	Verginer, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2021). Talent goes to global cities: The world network of scientists’ mobility. Research Policy, 50 (1), 104127.
	Wolinsky, H. (2009). Home is where the bench is: International mobility is not restricted to young scientists. EMBO Reports, 10 (11), 1196- 1198.
	Yurevich, M. A., Malakhov, V. A., & Aushkap, D. S. (2019). Global experience in interaction with compatriot scientists: Lessons for Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89 (4), 342- 350.

序号	纳入标准
1	研究对象是全球科学家为代表的高层次人才
2	研究文献类型是学术期刊文章、学位论文、政策报告、会议论文、书籍章节、国际报道
3	研究主题是大科学与全球科学家流动
4	研究偏向定量、定性、混合方法
5	研究内容是有效解释有关大科学与科学家流动关系的表述
6	文献获取途径可获取全文

[1]	Donghai Zhang. The Shift of American Federal Science and Technology Policy and the Rise and Development of Research Universities in Postwar Era: Thoughts on the Development of Research Universities in China [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2025, 43(8): 118-128.
[2]	Zhichen Xia, Fan Yang. Big Science and the Role of University Scientists ：Take SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory as an Example [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2025, 43(8): 105-117.
[3]	Guangcai Yan. The Development Trajectory of Big Science and the Transformation of Scientific Organizations [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2025, 43(8): 1-15.