The Design of a Technological Literacy Assessment Framework: Based on Ideas of International Frameworks for Chinese Basic Education

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.004

Abstract

Abstract: Assessment of technological literacy remains an urgent issue to be addressed in technology education. Typical instruments such as PISA science literacy framework, NAEP science and technology literacy framework, TIMSS framework are widely used internationally. Through an analysis of the frameworks, this paper summarizes the ideas pertaining to technology-related literacy framework design, common connotations and their applications. It then sketches a preliminary technological literacy framework applicable to Chinese secondary and primary education. The pilot study, based on a large sample, reveals that the major dimensions of the instrument developed possess acceptable to good reliability and validity.

Key words: general technology, technological literacy, literacy assessment, assessment framework, framework development

ZHUANG Tengteng, XIE Chen. The Design of a Technological Literacy Assessment Framework: Based on Ideas of International Frameworks for Chinese Basic Education[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(6): 42-53+155.

References

杜洪飞. (2006). 经典测量理论与项目反应理论的比较研究. 社会心理科学, 21(6), 15-17.
顾建军.(2004).世界各国技术类课程的设置启示. 世界教育信息,(5),49-53.
胡圆圆. (2017). PISA 2015框架下科学习题质量分析与改进策略. 宁波大学硕士专业学位论文.
李隆盛. (2000). 科技与人力教育的提升. 台北:师大书苑.
梁润婵. (2009). TIMSS、PISA、NAEP科学测试框架与测试题目的比较研究. 广西师范大学硕士专业学位论文.
刘帆,文雯. (2015). PISA2015科学素养测评框架新动向及其对我国科学教育的启示. 外国教育研究, 304(42), 117-128.
王秀红.(2005).普通高中学生技术素养现状调查及教育对策研究.南京师范大学硕士学位论文.
杨国海,张增常. (2012). 技术素养的内涵及测评框架. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 30(2), 149-152.
杨玉琴. (2017). 美国NAEP技术与工程素养评估述评. 外国教育研究,44(8), 22-35.
张辉蓉,杨欣,李美仪,李思睿,宋宇轩.(2017).初中生信息技术素养测评模型构建研究.中国电化教育,368(9),33-38.
张莉娜. (2016). PISA 2015科学素养测评对我国中小学科学教学与评价的启示. 全球教育展望, 45(3), 15-24.
赵中建. (2016). 美国中小学工程教育及技术与工程素养评估. 全球教育展望, 45(12), 3-24.
Cook. K.C. (2002). Layered Literacies:A Theoretical Frame for Technical Communication Pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 5-29.
Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U., & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessment in education:Assessing component skills and collecting contextual data. Paris:OECD Publishing.
Davies, R. S. (2011).Understanding Technology Literacy:A Framework for Evaluating Educational Technology Integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45-52.
Eisenberg, M.B., & Johnson, D. (2002). Learning and teaching information technology:Computer skills in context. ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 465377.
Hansen, J. W. (2003). To change perceptions of technology programs. Journal of Technology Studies,29, 16-19.
IEA. (2017). Timss 2019 frameworks. MA:TIMSS & PIRLS.
ITEA (International Technology Education Association). (2000). Standards for technological literacy:content for the study of technology. Reston, Va:ITEA.
NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). (2014a). Abridged technology and engineering literacy framework. Retrieved from:http://iucat.iu.edu/iupui/13455870.
NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). (2014b). About the TEL Assessment. Retrieved from:https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/tel_2014/#about/overview.
NAEP. (2015).Explore a TEL task. Retrieved from:http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/tel/wells_item.aspx.
NAP (National Academies Press). (2002).Technically Speaking:Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, D.C.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analysis framework:Science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (revised edition). Paris:OECD Publishing.
WestEd.(2011).Technology and engineering literacy assessment and item specifications for the 2014 National Assessment of Educational Progress (pre-publication edition). Retrieve from:http://www.nagb.rog/publications/frameworks/technology/2014-technology-framework.