Return and Response: The Future Trend of China’s Rural Education Construction from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization Strategy

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.12.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Rural education has its own unique value attribution, spiritual connotation, discourse system and practice methods. To realize the characteristic development of rural education, it is necessary to preserve its unique cultural connotation. However, the development of rural education has lost its culture essence, which is mainly manifested in the value decline of local culture, the division of nature and social attributes, and the dependent development mechanisms. In response to this, it is necessary to consider providing rural teenagers with education that are compatible with their cultural model of “Cultural Responsive Education”. This educational concept highlights the unique connotation of rural culture, and emphasizes “locality” of education concept, curriculum, teaching methods, teacher training and evaluation mode. It promotes the characteristic development of rural education at three levels, including reconstructing confidence of rural education’s cultural identity, unifying rural education’s cultural crack, cultivating rural education’s open cultural mind. Implementing cultural responsive education includes the purpose of education responding to the characteristics of regional culture, the contents of education emphasizing the integration of urban and rural culture, the teaching methods taking advantages of rural areas’ characteristics.Besides, experts conceive the concept of adaptive evaluation system, and teachers strengthen their cultural understanding and reflection consciousness.

Key words: rural education, characteristic development, cultural responsive education, cultural dilemma, rural revitalization

Xiaojie Quan, Qiyong Cai, Jiyue Xie. Return and Response: The Future Trend of China’s Rural Education Construction from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization Strategy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(12): 63-72.

References 0

	布尔迪厄, 帕斯隆. (2021). 再生产——一种教育系统理论的要点(邢克超译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
	陈讯. (2020). 阶层分化视角下的乡村教育衰落研究. 杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）, (3), 128- 136.
	程红艳. (2013). 文化敏感性教学: 理解“外来者”“少数人”和“沉默者”. 南京社会科学, (3), 113- 119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2013.03.017
	程良宏, 马新英. (2014). 课堂教学中教师的文化敏感性及其培育. 全球教育展望, 43 (12), 36- 43.
	方明. (2006). 陶行知名篇精选集. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
	冯建军. (2021). 从同一性到差异性: 重构乡村教育的正义之维. 探索与争鸣, (4), 22- 24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2021.04.007
	盖伊, 王明娣. (2017). 文化回应教学理论: 背景、思想与实践——华盛顿大学多元文化教育中心Geneva Gay 教授访谈. 当代教育与文化, 9 (1), 104- 108.
	高书国. (2018). 重估乡村教育价值, 走出中国特色现代乡村教育之路. 人民教育, (17), 33- 37.
	吉登斯. (2009). 社会学(李康译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	姜超, 邬志辉. (2017). 论农村教育现代化的理念选择. 教育研究, 38 (6), 65- 72.
	靳伟, 裴淼, 董秋瑾. (2020). 文化回应性教学法: 内涵、价值及应用. 民族教育研究, 31 (3), 104- 111.
	李安民. (1988). 关于文化涵化的若干问题. 中山大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (4), 45- 52.
	李召存. (2017). 探寻文化回应性的学前教育质量评价. 教育研究, 38 (4), 64- 71.
	刘铁芳. (2013). 乡村教育的问题与出路. 教育观察(中下旬刊), 2 (4), 5- 8. doi: 10.16070/j.cnki.cn45-1388/g4zx.2013.04.013
	刘铁芳. (2021). 探寻乡村教育的基本精神. 探索与争鸣, (4), 15- 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2021.04.005
	孟筱. (2019). 乡村振兴视域下乡村教育发展难题与破解之道. 人民论坛, (28), 74- 75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2019.28.029
	戚万学, 刘伟. (2020). 乡村教育振兴的内涵、价值与路径. 国家教育行政学院学报, (6), 21- 28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4038.2020.06.004
	钱理群, 刘铁芳. (2008). 乡土中国与乡村教育. 福州: 福建教育出版社.
	石鸥, 周美云. (2019). 试论乡土教材在乡村振兴战略中的意义与价值. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 37 (1), 66- 71+167. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.008
	苏刚, 曲铁华. (2014). 现代化进程中我国农村教育价值取向的嬗变及重构. 教育发展研究, 34 (1), 12- 16. doi: 10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2014.01.002
	王红. (2019). 乡村教育在地化研究. 长春: 东北师范大学博士学位论文.
	王乐. (2014). 乡村少年“离土”教育的回归—基于“文化回应教育学”的视角. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 13 (3), 98- 102.
	王丽燕. (2018). 学校要在振兴乡村中担负起新的文化使命. 浙江教育报, 2018−8−22(3).
	肖正德, 卢尚建. (2019). 乡村振兴战略中的并存教育变革——文化境遇与文化选择. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
	徐继存, 高盼望. (2016). 新式教育的乡村疏离. 教育研究与实验, (1), 8- 14.
	薛正斌. (2017). 我国民族地区多元文化背景下的教师能力标准建构. 教育科学研究, (11), 79- 83.
	杨东平. (2015). 未来农村教育的新图景. 人民教育, (22), 32- 35.
	杨海燕, 高书国. (2017). 农村教育的价值、特征与发展模式. 教育研究, 38 (6), 73- 79+86.
	袁凤琴. (2017). 论文化回应性教育对我国民族地区学校教育的启示. 贵州民族研究, 38 (9), 209- 213. doi: 10.13965/j.cnki.gzmzyj10026959.2017.09.048
	袁利平, 温双. (2018). 乡土课程开发的文化价值与实践选择. 中国教育学刊, (5), 80- 85.
	中共中央国务院. (2018). 乡村振兴战略规划(2018—2022年). 取自中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站(2021年6月28日): http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/26/content_5325534.htm
	中华人民共和国教育部. (2020). 中国教育概况——2020年全国教育事业发展情况. 取自中华人民共和国教育部网站(2021年6月28日): http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/s5990/202111/t20211115_579974.html
	周晔, 武天宏. (2020). 乡村教育自信: 现实遭遇、当下价值与重建理路. 当代教育科学, (1), 71- 76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2020.01.014
	Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: a synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86 (1), 163- 206. doi: 10.3102/0034654315582066
	Brenner, D. (2019). A summary and critique of the section 5005 report on rural education: Final report. Journal of the National Rural Education Association, 40 (1), 91- 95.
	Burgess, C. M. , & Evans, J. R. (2017). Culturally responsive relationships focused pedagogies: The key to quality teaching and creating quality learning environments. In Keengw, J. (Ed. ). Handbook of Research on Promoting Cross-Cultural Competence and Social Justice in Teacher Education. Hershey, USA: IGI Global.
	Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78 (4), 941- 993. doi: 10.3102/0034654308323036
	Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
	Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (3), 465- 491. doi: 10.3102/00028312032003465
	Ladson-Billings, G. (2022). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
	Pewewardy C. D. (1994). Culturally responsible pedagogy in action: An American Indian magnet school. In Hollins E. , King J. , & Hayman W. (ed. ). Teaching Diverse Populations: Formulating a Knowledge Base. Albany: Albany State University of New York Press.
	Tobin, J. (2005). Quality in early childhood education: An anthropologist's perspective. Early Education and Development, 16 (4), 421- 434. doi: 10.1207/s15566935eed1604_3
	Vass, G. (2018). “Aboriginal learning style” and culturally responsive schooling: Entangled, entangling, and the possibilities of getting disentangled. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (8), 89- 104. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n8.6

[1]	Zhihui Wu, Qin Wang. Empirical Research on Rural Education in China and the Construction of Autonomous Knowledge System [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(11): 54-73.
[2]	Tiantian Qin, Shanhuai Liu, Meina Yin, Xue Zhang. Research on the Calculation Standard of Authorized Number of Preschool Teachers under the Rural Revitalization Strategy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(6): 57-81.
[3]	Huaiyin Hou, Zuoye Yuan. Rural Revitalization Calls for Rural Pedagogy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(12): 50-62.
[4]	Zhengde Xiao. An Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Rural Teachers’ Willingness of the Role Play of New Rural Sages in the Rural Revitalization Strategy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(7): 92-106.
[5]	Yongxin Zhu, Jing Luo. Boosting Rural Revitalization by Education: The World Bank’s “Learning Poverty” Project and its Implications for China [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(4): 96-103.
[6]	Liu Shanhuai, Zhang Xue, Zhu Xiuhong, Huo Ming. Empirical Research on Rural Education for Scientific Decision Making [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(9): 103-118.
[7]	Shi Yaojiang, Zhang Linxiu, Chang Fang, Liu Han, Tang Bin, Gao Qiufeng, Guan Hongyu, Nie Jingchun, Yang Jie, Bai Yu, Li Ying, Tang Lei, Yue Ai, Ru Tong. Practices and Experiences of Randomized Controlled Trials in China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviations in Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(8): 1-67.
[8]	Qi Zhanyong, Wang Zhiyuan. The Dilemma and Orientation of Rural Vocational Education Development under the Rural Revitalization Strategy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(4): 107-117.
[9]	Zhu Chengchen, Yan Guangfen, Zhu Dequan. Rural Construction and Rural Education: An Integrated Model for Targeted Poverty Alleviation of Vocational Education and Rural Revitalization Strategy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(2): 127-135.
[10]	LIU Shanhuai. Quantitative Research Driven by Rural Education Problems [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(3): 57-63+169.
[11]	FAN Yong-Kun, WU Zhi-Hui. China’s Rural Education Development Direction: Predicament and the Way out [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2012, 30(4): 26-30.
[12]	RONG Zhong-Kui. Impetus and Mutual Crossed-struggles of Chinese Rural Education Vicissitudes in the Last 100 Years [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2011, 29(2): 26-32.