On the Core Concepts of Education Code: Based on Juristic Act and Administrative Act

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.05.003

Abstract

Abstract:

A code is the symbol and product of highly developed legal technology, and it is also the best model for the construction and precisely application of legal concepts and norms. Establishing the core concepts of education code as a tool for extracting common factors is a necessary prerequisite for compiling education code. However, the choice of the core concepts of education code and the definition of its connotation fundamentally affect the path and structure arrangement of codification, so it should be carefully determined after systematic thinking and system construction of China’s educational rule of law practice. According to the analysis of the concept evolution, value orientation and system function of the core concepts of civil law and administrative law, the core concepts of educational code need to realize the unity of formal rationality and value rationality, to promote the integration of external and internal systems, and to highlight the unique value pursuit of educational law.

Key words: the core concepts, education code, juristic act, administrative act

Suping Shen, Hang Zhou. On the Core Concepts of Education Code: Based on Juristic Act and Administrative Act[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 17-27.

References 51

1	陈涛, 高在敏. (2004). 中国法典编纂的历史发展与进步. 法律科学, (03), 107- 116.
2	成协中. (2020). 行政行为概念生成的价值争论与路径选择. 法制与社会发展, (01), 154- 171.
3	茨威格特, 克茨. (2017). 比较法总论(上)(潘汉典等译). 北京: 中国法制出版社.
4	窦海阳. (2013). 论法律行为的概念. 北京: 社科文献出版社.
5	窦海阳. (2016). 法律行为概念的再思考. 比较法研究, (01), 109- 125.
6	弗卢梅. (2013). 法律行为论(迟颖译). 北京: 法律出版社.
7	哈特. (2018). 法律的概念(第三版)(许家馨, 李冠宜译). 北京: 法律出版社.
8	黄茂荣. (2020). 法学方法与现代民法. 台北: 台湾大学法学丛书.
9	黄宇骁. (2019). 行政法学总论阿基米德支点的选择. 法制与社会发展, (06), 144- 164.
10	凯利. (2010). 西方法律思想简史(王笑红译). 北京: 法律出版社.
11	考夫曼. (2011). 法律哲学(刘幸义等译). 北京: 法律出版社.
12	拉伦茨. (2013). 德国民法通论(下)(王晓晔等译). 北京: 法律出版社.
13	拉伦茨. (2020). 法学方法论(黄家镇译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
14	雷槟硕. (2021). 教育法是独立的部门法. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (10), 115- 126.
15	雷磊. (2017). 法律概念是重要的吗. 法学研究, (04), 74- 96.
16	李洪雷. (2014). 行政法释义学: 行政法学理的更新. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
17	梁慧星. (2015). 民法解释学(第四版). 北京: 法律出版社.
18	梁迎修. (2008). 方法论视野中的法律体系与体系思维. 政法论坛, (01), 61- 67.
19	鲁鹏宇. (2009). 论行政法学的阿基米德支点—以德国行政法律关系论为核心的考察. 当代法学, (05), 50- 59.
20	卢志强. (2021). 我国民法对“法律行为”理论继受的历史考察与理论反思. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), (02), 14−20.
21	秦惠民, 王俊. (2021). 比较法视野下教育法学定位与学科体系. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (12), 1- 14.
22	任海涛. (2021). 教育法典总则编的体系构造. 东方法学, (06), 123- 140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1466.2021.06.009
23	萨维尼, 格林. (2014). 萨维尼法学方法论讲义与格林笔记(杨代雄译). 北京: 法律出版社.
24	萨维尼. (2001). 论立法与法学的当代使命(许章润译). 北京: 中国法制出版社.
25	舒国滢. (2021). 法学的知识谱系. 北京: 商务印书馆.
26	孙宪忠. (2008). 中国民法继受潘德克顿法学: 引进、衰落和复兴. 中国社会科学, (02), 88- 102+206.
27	王洪亮. (2016). 法律行为与私人自治. 华东政法大学学报, (05), 51- 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4622.2016.05.005
28	王锴. (2018). 论行政事实行为的界定. 法学家, (04), 51- 65+192−193.
29	王名扬. (2016). 法国行政法. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
30	王泽鉴. (2019). 法律思维与案例研习: 请求权基础理论体系. 台北: 作者自版发行.
31	维亚克尔. (2006). 近代私法史: 以德意志的发展为观察重点(陈爱娥, 黄建辉译). 上海: 三联书店.
32	翁岳生(主编). (2020). 行政法(增订四版). 台北: 元照出版社.
33	吴丙新. (2006). 法律概念的生成. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, (01), 102- 106.
34	谢鸿飞. (2003). 论法律行为概念的缘起与法学方法. 私法, (01), 55- 100.
35	徐涤宇. (2004). 法律行为概念的缘起及其精神气质. 南京大学法律评论, (02), 191- 203.
36	许中缘. (2007). 论法律概念—以民法典体系构成为视角. 法制与社会发展, (02), 72- 83.
37	薛刚凌. (2020). 行政法法典化之基本问题研究—以行政法体系建构为视角. 现代法学, (06), 78- 95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2020.06.06
38	薛军. (2007). 法律行为理论在欧洲私法史上的产生及术语表达问题研究. 环球法律评论, (01), 36- 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6728.2007.01.006
39	薛军. (2008). 法律行为“合法性”迷局之破解. 法商研究, (02), 37- 47.
40	杨代雄. (2005). 潘得克吞法学中的行为与法律行为理论—民法典总则诞生的序曲. 西南政法大学学报, (06), 44- 51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4355.2005.06.009
41	杨代雄. (2021). 法律行为论. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
42	姚明斌. (2021). 民法典体系视角下的意思自治与法律行为. 东方法学, (03), 140- 155. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1466.2021.03.010
43	湛中乐, 苏宇. (2016). 教育法学的理论体系与学科建设初论. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (02), 13- 24.
44	章志远. (2003). 行政行为概念之科学界定. 浙江社会科学, (01), 90- 95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2253.2003.01.025
45	赵宏. (2012). 法治国下的目的性创设: 德国行政行为理论与制度实践. 北京: 法律出版社.
46	赵宏. (2021). 行政法学的主观法体系. 北京: 中国法制出版社.
47	中国人大网. (2021-04-21). 全国人大常委会2021年度立法工作计划. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202104/1968af4c85c246069ef3e8ab36f58d0c.shtml. 2021-11-05.
48	周伟. (2015). 论行政行为概念的嬗变. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), (02), 25−38+123.
49	朱庆育. (2008). 法律行为概念疏证. 中外法学, (03), 325- 372.
50	朱庆育. (2020). 第三种体例: 从《民法通则》到《民法典》总则编. 法制与社会发展, (04), 77- 90.
51	Maorer, H. , Waldhoff, C. (2020). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht(20. Auflage). C. H. Beck Verlag.

[1]	Haitao Ren, Zhongyuan Kong. The Systemization of “Educational Legal Subject” in the Context of the Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(5): 112-126.
[2]	Tieshuan Feng. Research on the Systematization of Educational Finance and Taxation Issues in Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 89-99.
[3]	Xiaobing Sun, Lanlan Liu. Formulating Education Code with the Core of the Right to Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 8-16.
[4]	Tao Jin. On the Formation Path of Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 77-88.
[5]	Haitao Ren. The Specific Provisions of Education Code: Concepts, Systems and Content [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 63-76.
[6]	Hongbo Li. Institutional Positioning and Logical Framework of Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 53-62.
[7]	Huimin Qin, Jun Wang. Comparing and Reference: Basic Function and Path in Codification of Education Law in China [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 28-39.
[8]	Sijie Wang. The Enlightenment of Foreign Civil Codes to the Codification of Education Code of China: Taking the Four Modern Civil Codes as the Research Center [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 130-142.
[9]	Binbin Duan. The Style Structure of Education Code: Extraterritorial Models and Chinese Solutions [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 118-129.
[10]	Haijun Wang. The History of Codification of Code and its Mirror to the Establishment of Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 108-117.
[11]	Ning Liu, Siya Wu. Codification of Family Education Promotion Law in Education Code [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 100-107.
[12]	Daquan Wang. The Practical Significance and Realization Path of Codification of Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(5): 1-7.