我国“有质量”的学前教育发展内涵与实现进路

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

21世纪以来，追求高质量学前教育已成为世界各国的共识，国际社会均将高质量学前教育视为构筑国家财富的重要标志之一。在我国，《中国教育现代化2035》也明确提出了“普及有质量的学前教育”这一发展目标。融合“客观主义”和“相对主义”的质量内涵，本文阐析了我国学前教育质量的三重价值诉求及五维核心要素，提出了政府、机构、家庭对话联动，课程和师资、制度和监测等要素系统建设的质量框架体系；从学前教育质量的可负担、公平均衡和持续活力三方面梳理了我国“有质量”学前教育发展的现实困境；并从儿童发展目标重构、课程和师资提升、公共服务体系完善三方面为未来的实现进路提出了建议。

关键词: “有质量”, 学前教育, 发展内涵, 实现进路

Abstract:

Since the 21st century, the pursuit of high-quality preschool education has become the global consensus, and the international community has regarded preschool education as one of the important symbols of building the wealth of nations. China’s Education Modernization 2035 also clearly puts forward the development goal of “universal quality preschool education”. With an integration of objectivist and relativist approaches in defining quality, this paper expounds three levels of value appeal and five dimensions of core elements of preschool education quality in China, and proposes a government-organisation-family dialogue mechanism and a quality framework including curriculum, teachers, educational system and monitoring. It sorts out the realistic dilemmas in the development of China’s quality preschool education from affordability, equitability and sustainability. Then, the paper advises to reconstruct early childhood development goals, enhance the quality of preschool curriculum and teachers, and improve the public service system of early childhood education and care.

Key words: quality, preschool education, development connotation, realization approach

黄瑾, 熊灿灿. 我国“有质量”的学前教育发展内涵与实现进路[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(3): 33-47.

Jin Huang, Cancan Xiong. Quality Preschool Education in China: Development Connotation and Realization Approach[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(3): 33-47.

图/表 1

参考文献 0

	陈宝生. (2019). 国务院关于学前教育事业改革和发展情况的报告. 取自中国人大网(2019年8月22日): http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/201908.shtml.
	程秀兰, 高游. (2019). 幼儿园教师社会支持与工作投入的关系: 心理资本的中介作用. 学前教育研究, 33 (12), 41- 51.
	大宫勇雄. (2014). 提高幼儿教育质量(李季湄译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
	党荣蓉. (2017). 辽宁省学前教育管理信息化应用现状及对策研究. 中国教育信息化, 23 (1), 14- 16.
	顾明远. (2012). 试论教育现代化的基本特征. 教育研究, 34 (9), 4- 10+26.
	洪秀敏, 姜丽云. (2018). “全面二孩”政策下学前教育发展的问题——基于二期学前教育三年行动计划的调查与分析. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 63 (5), 53- 61.
	康建琴, 刘焱. (2011). 制定幼儿园评估标准需要澄清的几个问题. 学前教育研究, 25 (1), 29- 33.
	李欢欢, 黄瑾. (2019). “高素质善保教”幼儿教师培训模型之构建. 中国教育学刊, 40 (2), 11- 17.
	李召存. (2017). 探寻文化回应性的学前教育质量评价. 教育研究, 39 (4), 64- 71.
	林媛. (2020). 民办幼儿园教育质量现状调查——以M市为例. 教育观察, 9 (12), 118- 120.
	刘昆, 郭力平, 钟晨焰. (2016). 美国学前教育质量评级与提升系统: 实施现状及面临的挑战. 外国教育研究, 43 (5), 110- 128.
	刘焱, 郑孝玲. (2020). 关于普惠性学前教育公共服务属性定位的探讨. 教育研究, 42 (1), 4- 15.
	刘占兰, 高丙成. (2013). 中国学前教育综合发展水平研究. 教育研究, 35 (4), 30- 37.
	罗妹, 李克建. (2017). 基于全国428个班级样本的学前教育质量城乡差距透视. 学前教育研究, 31 (6), 13- 20.
	马建芳, 田汉族. (2018). 公立幼儿园服务定位落实的困境与出路. 陕西学前师范学院学报, 34 (2), 109- 113.
	佩恩. (2018). 早期教育质量: 国际视角(潘月娟等人译). 北京: 教育科学出版社.
	沙莉. (2016). 发展中人口大国学前教育质量政策研究: 基于印度、巴西的比较及启示. 外国中小学教育, 35 (5), 5- 14.
	宋映泉. (2019). 我国学前教育事业发展主要矛盾与公共财政投入改革方向. 教育经济评论, 4 (3), 19- 48.
	田方, 黄瑾. (2020). 高质量早期教育成效何以延续?——OECD国家早期教育和保育课程框架的特征分析及启示. 中国教育学刊, 41 (5), 28- 32.
	田园园. (2017). 我国区域学前教育发展现状及发展方向的比较研究——基于15省市的学前教育三年行动计划的文本分析. 陕西学前师范学院学报, 33 (4), 13- 19+29.
	王钢, 范勇, 黄旭, 刘先强 & 王德林. (2018). 幼儿教师政府支持、组织支持和胜任力对职业幸福感的影响: 职业认同的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 16 (6), 801- 809.
	王艺芳, 姜勇, 林瑜阳. (2018). “全面二孩”政策下我国学前教育资源的配置——基于Leslie模型. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 17 (3), 59- 66.
	魏易. (2019). 中国教育财政家庭调查报告(2019). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
	伍爱. (2006). 质量管理学(第3版). 广州: 暨南大学出版社.
	徐小妮, 郭力平. (2016). 美国早期儿童数据系统的建设与启示. 学前教育研究, 30 (6), 15- 24.
	薛二勇, 傅王倩, 李健. (2019). 学前教育立法的政策基础、挑战与应对. 中国教育学刊, 40 (12), 37- 44.
	杨莉君, 黎玲. (2019). 精准扶教: 合理满足贫困山区对学前教育质量的需求. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 18 (6), 100- 106+115.
	杨莉君, 彭荣. (2017). 论过程性的学前教育基本质量评价观. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 16 (6), 110- 115.
	杨晓萍, 周文婕, 杨雄. (2017). 走向和合: 学前教育质量话语的转向. 教育评论, 33 (11), 3- 7.
	余强. (2010). 墨西哥《学前义务教育法》的制定与实施及其对我国的启示. 学前教育研究, 24 (11), 17- 23.
	虞永平, 朱佳慧. (2018). 尊重学前教育规律是推进幼儿园课程改革的根本问题——南京师范大学虞永平教授访谈录. 江苏幼儿教育, 5 (2), 4- 6+21.
	朱莉雅, 唐爱民. (2020). 我国学前教育“一主多元”供给机制的运行困境及其优化. 当代教育论坛, 19 (3), 12- 19.
	Boocock, S. S. (1995). Early childhood programs in other nations: Goals and outcomes. The Future of Children, 5 (3), 94- 114.
	Boyd, M. (2013). “I Love My Work But... ” The Professionalization of Early Childhood Education. Qualitative Report, 18 (36), 1- 20.
	Council of the European Union. (2019). Council recommendation of 22 May 2019 on high quality early childhood education and care systems (2019/C 189/02).
	Fagnani, J. (2013). Equal access to quality care: Lessons from France on providing high-quality and affordable early childhood education and care. In L. Gambaro, K. Stewart, & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), Equal access to childcare: Providing quality early childhood education and care to disadvantaged families (pp. 77–99). London, New York: The Policy Press.
	Fitzpatrick, M. D. (2008). Starting school at four: The effect of universal pre-kindergarten on children’s academic achievement. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8 (1), 1897.
	Hunkin, E. (2018). Whose quality? The (mis) uses of quality reform in early childhood and education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 33 (4), 443- 456.
	Hunkin, E. (2019). Devastating impacts? Investigating “edu-quality” discourse in early childhood policy and its implications. Journal of Education Policy, 36（2）, 196−210.
	Logan, H. (2018). Retaining meanings of quality in Australian early childhood education and care policy history: perspectives from policy makers. Early Years, 38 (2), 139- 155.
	Lopez, J. (2011). Bridging the Gap between Policy and Implementation: Preschool Education in Mexico, Latin America and Spain. In Blake, S., Winsor, D. L., & Allen, L. (Eds.), Technology and Young Children: Bridging the Communication-Generation Gap (pp. 242−260). IGI Global.
	Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1994). Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality. New York: Teachers College Press.
	Myers, R. G. (2005). In search of quality in programmes of early childhood care and education (ECCE). A paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report.
	OECD. (2006). Starting Strong Ⅱ: Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
	OECD. (2012). Starting Strong Ⅲ: Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
	OECD. (2015). Starting Strong Ⅳ: Monitoring Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
	OECD. (2017). Starting Strong Ⅴ: Transitions from Early Childhood Education and Care to Primary Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
	Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing, 49 (4), 41- 50.
	Peeters, J., Cameron, C., Lazzari, A., Peleman, B., Budginaite, I., Hauari, H., & Siarova, H. (2015). Early childhood care: Working conditions, training and quality of services: A systematic review. Bruxelles: Eurofound.
	Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Wong, Y. L. (1999). Defining and evaluating ‘quality’ early childhood education in an international context: Dilemmas and possibilities. Early Years, 20 (1), 7- 18.
	Tobin, J. (2005). Quality in early childhood education: An anthropologist’s perspective. Early Education and Development, 16 (4), 421- 434.

[1]	张斌, 程晨, 张帅, 虞永平. 事业发展视角下学前教育实证研究的知识生产与价值引领——基于2015—2019年样本文献的梳理与分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(9): 228-250.
[2]	中国发展研究基金会. 中国西部学前教育发展情况报告[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(1): 97-126.