An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

Abstract

Abstract:

Russell’s critique against Dewey’s new logic in the early 20^th century is a symbol of some controversy over the orientation of critical thinking training. This article sets out from a conception of argument popular in earlier analytic philosophy, exemplified by the Principle of Clifford, and thereby examines the historical quarrel over “inquiry” between Russell and Dewey and its embarrassing outcome. After introducing the new conception of argument propounded eminently by Stephen Toulmin and embedding it in Dewey’s theory of inquiry, it is showed in what sense Russell’s criticism against Dewey was based upon some serious misunderstanding of Dewey’s methodology as well as of his key texts. At last, for the viewpoint of philosophy of education, this article suggests that the conception of argument-as-inquiry has the advantage of emphasizing arguers’ engaging in a variety of living experience and warning them against converting academic arguments into some sort of linguistic games.

Key words: argument, inquiry, critical thinking, ideas of education

Liuhua Zhang. An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 71-81.

Figures/Tables 3

References 0

	张留华. (2016). 哲学语言及其术语伦理. 中国社会科学, (12), 41- 59.
	张留华. (2020). 信念规范的经济之维: 对“实用性”的一种解读. 社会科学, (9), 112- 123.
	Clifford, W. K. (2011). Lectures and Essays, volume 2, edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Dewey, J. (1916). Essays in Experimental Logic. New York: Dover Publications.
	Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
	Dewey, J. (1941). Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 38(7), 169—186.
	Dewey, J. (1958). “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 515−608.
	Gale, R. (1959). Russell’s Drill Sergeant and Bricklayer and Dewey’s Logic. The Journal of Philosophy, 56(9), 401—406.
	Haack, S. (1997). “‘The Ethics of Belief’ Reconsidered”, in The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 129−144.
	Hurley, P. J. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Logic. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
	Hunter, D. A. (2014). A Practical Guide to Critical Thinking: Deciding What to Do and Believe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
	James, W. (1956). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover.
	James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover.
	Johnston, J. S. (2009). Deweyan Inquiry: From Educational Theory to Practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
	Madigan, T. J. (2009). W. K. Clifford and “The Ethics of Belief”. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
	Monk, R. (1996). Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude (1872—1921). New York: The Free Press.
	Russell, B. (1910). Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, Green.
	Russell, B. (1958). “Dewey’s New Logic”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 135−156.
	Russell, B. (1995). An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London and New York: Routledge.
	Russell, B. (1996). History of Western Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
	Russell, B. (1997). “The Spirit of Inquiry”, in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11. London: Routledge, 432−440.
	Toulmin, S., R. Rieke and A. Janik. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
	Toulmin, S. E. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
	Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[1]	Hongbiao Yin, Han Qin. Framing the Research into Teacher Professional Learning Communities: Paradigms, Interests and Discourses [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(3): 61-77.
[2]	Xiaoling Peng, Bian Wu. How is data-driven precision teaching possible? From the perspective of cultivating teacher’s data wisdom [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(8): 45-56.
[3]	Hongliang Dong. The Evidence-based Transformation of Teaching Research: Preliminary Discussion on Basic Concepts [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(5): 108-115.
[4]	Cheng-Hsi Chen. Justification of Critical Thinking: A Response to Whether Critical Thinking Only Applies to Free Society? [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(1): 78-93.
[5]	Andreas Schleicher. Educating Students for Their Future, Rather than Our Past [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(5): 1-21.
[6]	Ma Lihong, Wei Rui, Liu Jian, Ma Mingyan, Liu Yan, Gan Qiuling, Kang Cuiping, Xu Guanxing. Critical Thinking: Part II of the 5Cs Framework for Twenty-first Century Key Competences [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(2): 45-56.
[7]	Shao Faxian, Hu Weiping, Zhang Huan, Zhang Yanhong, Shou Xin. Sequential Analysis of Classroom Argumentation: The Pupils' Scientific Reasoning [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(6): 48-60.
[8]	PEI Xinning, LIU Xinyang. What Happens in Scientific Inquiry in Middle School Classroom: An Empirical Study Based on Multiple Cases [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(4): 107-121+165+166.
[9]	ZHANG Yaxing. Self-regulated Learning, Cooperative Learning and Inquiry Learning: Transformation of Student Learning Styles [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(1): 22-28+160.
[10]	TANG Bin . Dewey’s Inquiry Pedagogical Theory: A Contextual Discourse and Deviation [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(3): 55-62.