华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 55-67.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.003

• 专刊 · 第二辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师视角下教研工作质量与发展均衡程度的省际比较

谢晨1, 尹弘飚2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所、教育督导与评价国际研究中心,上海 200062
    2. 香港中文大学教育学院课程与教学系,香港新界沙田
  • 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-24
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“促进课堂转型的中小学教研体系重建”(16JJD880024)

The Provincial Comparison on Quality and Equity of Teaching-Research Work from Teachers’ Perspective

Chen Xie1, Hongbiao Yin2   

  1. 1. Institute of International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Faculty of Education, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-24

摘要:

加强和改进新时代基础教育教研工作,需要认清教研工作在全国各地的开展情况与存在的问题,以评价促发展。教师是教研工作的主要服务对象之一,对教研工作过程和结果的评价应该包括教师视角。基于全国30个省(区、市)5532位教研员、47620位教师的分层抽样调查数据,本研究构建并计算了各省级行政区的教研工作质量指数和教研发展均衡指数。结果表明:第一,教研工作质量评价较高的省份来自东部和东北地区,西北、西南、华南地区省份则有较多提升空间;第二,教研发展较均衡的有东北三省、江浙沪、以及中部4省(晋、湘、皖、豫),其他省份则均在低均衡组;第三,从机构设置、队伍建设、经费保障、工作方式4方面分析影响教研工作质量与发展均衡的因素,发现教研工作的领导方式对教研工作质量与发展均衡程度皆有重要影响,即专业领导倾向越强影响越积极,省(区、市)教师与教研员人数之比、教研员从事教研工作的平均年限则对教研工作质量有显著影响。这些发现为各地改善教研工作提供了证据基础与发展思路。

关键词: 教研工作, 教师视角, 教育评价, 教育质量, 教育公平

Abstract:

In order to improve K-12 teaching-research work in the new era, it is necessary to identify the current state and problems of teaching-research system across China. However, few empirical studies have examined the quality and equity of teaching-research work across the country, especially from the perspective of teachers for and with whom the teaching-research system works. Based on the data of a representative teacher sample collected from 30 provinces (N=47, 620), this study constructed the teaching-research quality index and the teaching-research equity index, and computed these two indexes’ scores for 30 provinces. The study found that: (a) all provinces with higher scores in the teaching-research quality index are from the East and the Northeast, and the provinces from the Northwest, the Southwest, and the South usually have lower scores; (b) the teaching-research equity index scores appear not to be related with geographical distribution, and Shanghai and Zhejiang win the best scores; (c) the regression analysis results show that the teaching-research quality index scores depend on the working style of teaching-research (professional vs. administrative leadership), the ratio of teachers to teaching-research officers, and years of teaching-research experiences, and the teaching-research equity index scores are related to the working style of teaching-research. Teachers’ perceptions of teaching-research work should be used as an important way to evaluate K-12 teaching-research. Our findings have implications for the improvement of teaching-research system and practices in future.

Key words: teaching-research work, teacher perspective, educational evaluation, educational quality, educational equity