创造性心理学视角下的创造性培养：目标、原则与策略

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.11.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

创造性包含着创造性潜能、创造性成就、创造性才能等侧面以及微创造、小创造、职业创造和大创造四种水平；学校教育中的创造性培养，应该以发展学生的创造性潜能为主要目标，应该同时关注学生的创造性认知、元认知、个性、动机和领域内知识的发展。创造性活动遵循从一般到具体、从低阶到高阶的发展顺序，自主性、生成性是创造性活动的本质特征。学校教育应该把发展创造性视为每个学生的成长目标，把创造性活动纳入日常教学，充分发挥学生学习的自主性，以生成活动作为创造性发展的载体，遵循从一般领域向具体领域推进的原则。有效地培养学生的创造性，需要营造支持性的氛围，充分利用生成活动，示范和褒奖创造性，加强创造性元认知训练，设置创造性评价标准，为学生的创造性提供反馈。

关键词: 创造性, 培养目标, 创造性过程, 自主性, 生成性

Abstract:

Creativity is a multifaceted concept which involves creative potentials, creative achievements, creative talents, and many other facets. Basically, creativity can be divided into four types, namely mini-creativity, little creativity, professional creativity, and big creativity. In school context, creativity cultivation should focus on students’ creative potentials, highlight the roles of creative cognition, metacognition, personality, motivation, and domain-specific knowledge. As creativity usually develops from general domains to specific domains, and autonomy and idea generation are the key components of creative processes, school education which aims to cultivate each student’s creativity in everyday classroom activities should encourage students’ autonomy, employ generative tasks, and stimulate creative thinking in specific contexts. To effectively develop students’ creativity, a series of strategies should be employed, which include creating supportive climates, using generative activities, modeling and rewarding creativity, training creative metacognition, setting creativity as separate goals, and providing feedback on creative performance.

Key words: creativity, educational goals, creative processes, autonomy, generation

庞维国. 创造性心理学视角下的创造性培养：目标、原则与策略[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(11): 25-40.

Weiguo Pang. Psychological Views on Cultivating Students’ Creativity: Goals, Principles, and Strategies[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(11): 25-40.

参考文献 0

	教育部考试中心.(2019). 中国高考评价体系. 人民教育出版社.
	陶行知.(1943). 创造宣言. 新华日报(重庆), 1943年11月25日.
	刘文令.(2018). 语文教师对作文创造性的评价: 现状及影响因素. 华东师范大学2018届博士学位论文.
	庞维国课堂中的创新学习: 生成论的视角华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2009 27 4 42 51 庞维国. (2009). 课堂中的创新学习: 生成论的视角. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),27(4),42—51.
	庞维国, 韩建涛, 徐晓波, 林崇德 “要有创造性” 指导语效应及其对创造性教学的启示心理与行为研究 2016 14 5 701 708 庞维国, 韩建涛, 徐晓波, 林崇德. (2016). “要有创造性” 指导语效应及其对创造性教学的启示. 心理与行为研究,14(5),701—708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2016.05.019
	Amabile, T. M Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1982 8 3 573 578 Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(3), 573—578. doi: 10.1177/0146167282083027
	Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations (HBS Note 9–396-239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
	Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning Research in Organizational Behavior 2016 36 157 183 Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157—183. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
	Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds. ). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
	Baer, J Creativity doesn’t develop in a vacuum New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2016 151 9 20 Baer, J. (2016). Creativity doesn’t develop in a vacuum. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151, 9—20.
	Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity Roeper Review 2005 27 158 163 Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158—163. doi: 10.1080/02783190509554310
	Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture Education 2015 43 371 381 Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education, 43, 371—381.
	Beghetto, R. A Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students Creativity Research Journal 2006 18 447 457 Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447—457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
	Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creativity in classrooms. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (2nd ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 587–606). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Beghetto, R. A. (2021). There is no creativity without uncertainty: Dubito Ergo Creo. Journal of Creativity, 31, Article 100005.
	Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In M. Karwowski, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 4–19). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
	Beghetto, R. A. , Karwowski, M. , & Reiter-Palmon, R. Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2021 15 4 637 644 Beghetto, R. A. , Karwowski, M. , & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2021). Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 637—644.
	Beghetto, R. A. , & Kaufman, J. C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2007 1 73 79 Beghetto, R. A. , & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73—79.
	Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C Classroom contexts for creativity High Ability Studies 2014 25 53 69 Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53—69. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2014.905247
	Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds). (2017). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
	Berliner, D. C. (2011). Narrowing curriculum, assessments, and conceptions of what it means to be smart in the U. S. schools: Creaticide by design. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Routledge.
	Besançon, M., Lubart, T., & Barbot, B Creative giftedness and educational opportunities Educational and Child Psychology 2013 30 2 79 88 Besançon, M., Lubart, T., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative giftedness and educational opportunities. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(2), 79—88.
	Bronson, P. O., & Merryman, A. (2010, July 19). The creativity crisis. Newsweek, 44–50. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/creativity-crisis-74665
	Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire Creativity Research Journal 2005 17 37 50 Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37—50. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
	Clapham, M. M Ideational skills training: A key element in creativity training programs Creativity Research Journal 1997 10 1 33 44 Clapham, M. M. (1997). Ideational skills training: A key element in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 33—44. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1001_4
	Cho, Y., Chung, K. Y., Choi, K., Seo, C., & Baek, E The emergence of student creativity in classroom settings: A case study of elementary schools in Korea Journal of Creative Behavior 2013 47 152 169 Cho, Y., Chung, K. Y., Choi, K., Seo, C., & Baek, E. (2013). The emergence of student creativity in classroom settings: A case study of elementary schools in Korea. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 152—169. doi: 10.1002/jocb.29
	Craft, A. (2007). Possibility thinking in the early years and primary classroom. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 231–249). World Scientific.
	Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A Child-initiated play and professional creativity: Enabling four-year-olds’ possibility thinking Thinking Skills and Creativity 2012 7 1 48 61 Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012). Child-initiated play and professional creativity: Enabling four-year-olds’ possibility thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 48—61. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.11.005
	Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering Creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
	Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (2010). (Eds.). The dark side of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
	Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
	Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review Thinking Skills and Creativity 2013 8 80 91 Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80—91. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
	De Bono, E. (1991). Lateral and vertical thinking. In J. Henry (Eds. ), Creative management (pp. 16−23). London: Sage.
	Eisenberger, R. , & Byron, K. (2011). Rewards and creativity. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed. , Vol. 2, pp. 313−318). San Diego: Academic Press.
	Feist, G. J. (2019). The function of personality in creativity: Updates on the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (2nd ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 353–373). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Finke, R. A., Ward, T. M., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
	Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis Journal of Educational Psychology 2017 109 269 299 Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 269—299. doi: 10.1037/edu0000133
	Glaveanu, V. P Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework Review of General Psychology 2013 17 69 81 Glaveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69—81. doi: 10.1037/a0029528
	Glaveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). The difference that makes a “creative” difference in education. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross-disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives (pp. 37–54). Switzerland: Springer.
	Guilford, J. P Some misconceptions regarding measurement of creative talents The Journal of Creative Behavior 1971 5 77 87 Guilford, J. P. (1971). Some misconceptions regarding measurement of creative talents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 77—87. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1971.tb00877.x
	Guo, J., Tong, Y. & Pang, W Teachers’ perceptions of students’ creativity in China’s classrooms: The role of students’ academic achievement and misbehaviors The Journal of Creative Behavior 2020 55 1 228 240 Guo, J., Tong, Y. & Pang, W. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ creativity in China’s classrooms: The role of students’ academic achievement and misbehaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 228—240.
	Harrington, D. M Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores Journal of Personality 1975 43 3 434 454 Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43(3), 434—454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.x
	Hattie, J., & Timperley, H The power of feedback Review of Educational Research 2007 77 81 112 Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81—112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
	Hennessey, B. A. (2019). Motivation and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (2nd ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 374–395). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Hunter, S. T., Walters, K., Nguyen, T., Manning, C., & Miller, S Malevolent creativity and malevolent innovation: A critical but tenuous linkage Creativity Research Journal 2021 1 22 Hunter, S. T., Walters, K., Nguyen, T., Manning, C., & Miller, S. (2021). Malevolent creativity and malevolent innovation: A critical but tenuous linkage. Creativity Research Journal, 1—22. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2021.1987735
	IBM 2010 Global CEO Study. (2010). Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss.
	Ivcevic, Z., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2017). From having an idea to doing something with it: Self-regulation for creativity. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The creative self: How our beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity impact our creativity (pp. 343−365). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
	James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension Creativity Research Journal 1999 12 3 211 226 James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 211—226. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1203_6
	Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1591.
	Karwowski, M The dynamics of creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity Creativity Research Journal 2016 28 99 104 Karwowski, M. (2016). The dynamics of creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 99—104. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1125254
	Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. Creative behavior as agentic action Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2019 13 4 402 415 Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402—415.
	Kaufman, J. C. & Beghtto, R. A Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity Review of General Psychology 2009 13 1 12 Kaufman, J. C. & Beghtto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1—12. doi: 10.1037/a0013688
	Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative Roeper Review 2013 35 155 165 Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155—165. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2013.799413
	Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Roberts, A. M. (2022). Creativity in the schools: Creativity models and new directions. In K. A. Allen, M. Furlong, D. Vella-Brodrick, & S. Suldo (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (3rd Ed): In support of positive educational processes (pp. 335−346). New York: Routledge.
	Kaufman, J. C., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2019). A review of creativity theories. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (2nd ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 27–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Krathwohl, D. R A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview Theory into Practice 2002 41 4 212 218 Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212—218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
	Lo, C. K Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology Educational Technology Research and Development 2018 66 793 811 Lo, C. K. (2018). Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 793—811. doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9578-x
	Liu, G., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Lee, C., Wang, Y. & Brownell, M Autonomous motivation and Chinese adolescents’ creative thinking: The doderating role of parental involvement Creativity Research Journal 2013 25 4 446 456 Liu, G., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Lee, C., Wang, Y. & Brownell, M. (2013). Autonomous motivation and Chinese adolescents’ creative thinking: The doderating role of parental involvement. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 446—456. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.843401
	Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B Creative potential and its measurement International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity 2013 1 41 50 Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41—50.
	Mobley, M. I., Doares, L. M., & Mumford, M. D Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization processes Creativity Research Journal 1992 5 2 125 155 Mobley, M. I., Doares, L. M., & Mumford, M. D. (1992). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization processes. Creativity Research Journal, 5(2), 125—155. doi: 10.1080/10400419209534428
	Moore, B., & Stanly, T. (2010). Critical thinking and formative assessments. Larchmount, New York: Eye on Education, Inc.
	Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M Process analytic models of creative capacities Creativity Research Journal 1991 4 2 91 122 Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91—122. doi: 10.1080/10400419109534380
	Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge The Journal of Creative Behavior 2012 46 1 30 47 Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30—47. doi: 10.1002/jocb.003
	Niu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2010). Creativity in mathematics teaching: A Chinese perspective. In R. A. Beghetto and J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity in the classroom (pp. 270–288). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Vol. V), PISA, OECD publishing. Retrieved from http://dx. doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en
	OECD. (2019). PISA 2021 creative thinking framework (third draft). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf
	Okada, T., & Ishibashi, K Imitation, inspiration, and creation: Cognitive process of creative drawing by copying others’ artworks Cognitive Science 2016 41 7 1804 1837 Okada, T., & Ishibashi, K. (2016). Imitation, inspiration, and creation: Cognitive process of creative drawing by copying others’ artworks. Cognitive Science, 41(7), 1804—1837.
	Pang, W. Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2015 9 2 122 127 Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 122—127.
	Pang, W., & Plucker, J. A Recent transformations in China’s economic, social, and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity The Journal of Creative Behavior 2012 46 247 273 Pang, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2012). Recent transformations in China’s economic, social, and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 247—273. doi: 10.1002/jocb.17
	Partnership for 21st Century Schools (P21). (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from: https://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf on April 11, 2022.
	Plucker, J. A Is the proof in the pudding? Re-analyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data Creativity Research Journal 1999 12 103 114 Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Re-analyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103—114. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
	Plucker, J. A. , Beghetto, R. A. , & Dow, G. T. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Educational Psychologist 2004 39 83 96 Plucker, J. A. , Beghetto, R. A. , & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists?. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83—96.
	Puozzo, I. C., & Audrin, C. (2021). Improving self-efficacy and creative self-efficacy to foster creativity and learning in schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100966.
	Rhodes, M An analysis of creativity Phi Delta Kappan 1961 42 305 310 Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305—310.
	Richards, R Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: Afterview for CRJ issues on creativity and health Creativity Research Journal 1990 3 300 326 Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: Afterview for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300—326. doi: 10.1080/10400419009534363
	Robinson, K. (2006, February). How schools kill creativity. (Video). Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity
	Runco, M. A Education for creative potential Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2003a 47 317 324 Runco, M. A. (2003a). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317—324. doi: 10.1080/00313830308598
	Runco, M. A. (2003b). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 69–94). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
	Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
	Runco, M. A., & Acar, S Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential Creativity Research Journal 2012 24 1 1 10 Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 1—10. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649235
	Runco, M. A., & Chand, I Cognition and creativity Educational Psychology Review 1995 7 243 267 Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243—267. doi: 10.1007/BF02213373
	Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J The standard definition of creativity Creativity Research Journal 2012 24 1 92 96 Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92—96. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
	Runco, M. A., Shepard, A. , & Tadik, H. (2022). How much creative potential is expressed at work? Journal of Creativity, 32, Article 100016.
	Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
	Simonton, D. K Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications Creativity Research Journal 2012 24 2-3 97 106 Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 97—106. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
	Starko, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (4th ed.). New York Routledge.
	Sternberg, R. J The nature of creativity Creativity Research Journal 2006 18 1 87 98 Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87—98. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
	Sternberg, R. J. Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2015 9 2 115 117 Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 115—117.
	Sternberg, R. J. A triangular theory of creativity Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2018 12 1 50 67 Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50—67.
	Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Enhancing people’s creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (2nd ed.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 88–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A A prototype of view of expert teaching Educational Researcher 1995 24 6 9 17 Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype of view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9—17. doi: 10.3102/0013189X024006009
	Sternberg, R. J. , & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3−15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
	Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
	Urban, K. K. (1995). Creativity: A component approach model. A paper presented at the 11th World Conference on the Education for the Gifted and Talented. Hong Kong: July 31–August 4, 1995.
	Wallace, G. (1926). The art of thought. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
	Ward, T. B Creative cognition as a window on creativity Methods 2007 42 28 37 Ward, T. B. (2007). Creative cognition as a window on creativity. Methods, 42, 28—37. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.002
	Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 761–787). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
	Yi, X., Plucker, J. A. & Guo, J Modeling influences on divergent thinking and artistic creativity Thinking Skills and Creativity 2015 16 62 68 Yi, X., Plucker, J. A. & Guo, J. (2015). Modeling influences on divergent thinking and artistic creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 62—68. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.002

[1]	邵志芳, 刘志, 杨舒豫, 黄忠敬. 开放能力：中国青少年社会与情感能力测评分报告之四[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(9): 77-92.
[2]	简成熙. 证成批判思维——兼回应批判思维只适用自由社会吗[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(1): 78-93.
[3]	[德]安德烈亚斯·施莱希尔（Andreas Schleicher）. 教育面向学生的未来，而不是我们的过去[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 1-21.
[4]	张忠炉, 李红. 通达创造性顿悟的具身之路[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(4): 80-89.
[5]	王灿明顾志燕严奕峰张志泉. 体验学习影响小学生创造性人格发展的实验研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(2): 53-60.
[6]	熊川武,江玲. 论学校教育与学生自主性发展 ——与西方学者汉德等人对话[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(4): 1-10.
[7]	岳伟王坤庆. 生成性存在：当代教育的一种人学探寻[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2010, 28(4): 29-36.
[8]	张金福. 中国大学自主性:概念与制度环境[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 25(3): 28-36.
[9]	周险峰. 教育文本理解的尺度:一种解释学的视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(4): 25-31.
[10]	沈模卫, 朱海燕, 张锋. 天才儿童及其教育问题新论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2003, 21(4): 75-79.
[11]	张玲. 加德纳多元智能理论对教育的意义到底何在?[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2003, 21(1): 44-52.