|
埃莉诺•奥斯特罗姆. (2000). 公共事物的治理之道(余逊达, 陈旭东, 译). 上海: 上海三联书店.
|
|
奥尔森. (2011). 集体行动的逻辑(陈郁, 郭宇峰, 李崇新, 译). 上海: 格致出版社、上海人民出版社.
|
|
巴伯. (1991). 科学与社会秩序(顾昕, 译). 北京: 生活•读书•新知三联书店.
|
|
白强. (2023). 高校有组织科研: 发展趋势、逻辑转向与机制创新——基于知识生产模式变革视角的分析. 江苏高教, (07), 28- 37.
|
|
保拉•斯蒂芬. (2016). 经济如何塑造科学(刘细文, 译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
|
彼得•J. 维斯特维克. (2023). 国家实验室: 美国体制中的科学(1947—1974)(钟扬, 黄艳燕, 顾卓雅, 译). 上海: 上海科学技术出版社.
|
|
布什. (2004). 科学: 无止境的前沿(范岱年, 解道华, 译. )北京: 商务印书馆.
|
|
查尔斯•汉迪. (2017). 我们身在何方?个人与组织的精准定位(周旭华, 译). 上海: 东方出版中心.
|
|
陈霞玲. (2023). 高校开展有组织科研的组织模式、经验特征与问题对策. 国家教育行政学院学报, (07), 78- 87.
|
|
大卫•利文斯通. (2017). 科学知识的地理(孟锴, 译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
|
|
国家统计局. (2023). 中华人民共和国2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230228_1919011.html.
|
|
海尔格•诺沃特尼, 彼得•斯科特, 迈克尔•吉本斯. (2011). 反思科学: 不确定时代的知识与公众(冷民, 徐秋慧, 译). 上海: 上海交通大学出版社.
|
|
吉本斯. (2011). 知识生产的新模式(陈洪捷, 沈文钦, 译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
|
|
教育部. 关于加强高校有组织科研 推动高水平自立自强的若干意见. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202208/t20220829_656091.html.
|
|
堺屋太一. (1987). 知识价值革命(黄晓勇, 译. )北京: 生活•读书•新知三联书店.
|
|
利奥塔. (1996). 后现代状况(岛子, 译). 长沙: 湖南美术出版社.
|
|
联合国教科文组织. (2022). 一起重新构想我们的未来. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
|
|
刘易斯•科塞. (2004). 理念人: 一项社会学的考察(郭方, 译). 北京: 中央编译出版社.
|
|
罗杰•盖格, 高筱卉. (2023). 论美国大学中有组织的研究单位. 高等工程教育研究, (05), 171- 180.
|
|
米努什•沙菲克. (2022)新社会契约(李艳, 译). 北京: 中信出版社.
|
|
乔恩•格特纳. (2016). 贝尔实验室与美国革新大时代(王勇, 译). 北京: 中信集团出版社.
|
|
唐纳德•肯尼迪. (2002). 学术责任(阎凤桥, 译). 北京: 新华出版社.
|
|
滕尼斯. (1999). 共同体与社会(林荣远, 译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
|
|
涂尔干. (2020). 社会分工论(渠敬东, 译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
|
|
薛凤, 柯安哲. (2019). 科学史新论: 范式更新与视角转化(吴秀杰, 译). 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
|
|
雅斯贝尔斯. (1989)历史的起源与目标(魏楚雄, 俞新天, 译). 北京: 华夏出版社.
|
|
约翰•罗尔斯, (2009). 正义论(何怀宏, 何包钢, 廖申白, 译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
|
|
约翰·齐曼. (1985). 知识的力量: 科学的社会范畴(许立达, 译). 上海: 上海科技出版社.
|
|
约翰•齐曼. (2002). 真科学(曾国屏, 匡辉, 张成岗, 译). 上海: 上海科技教育出版社.
|
|
张娟, 荀振芳. (2023). 高校有组织科研的内涵、特征及实施路径. 高等工程教育研究, (06), 99- 104.
|
|
赵万里. (1998). 特殊群体: 科学家的工作方式. 南京: 南开大学出版社.
|
|
周海涛, 蒋晓蝶. (2023). 高校有组织科研的逻辑进路. 现代大学教育, (05), 1- 8+112.
|
|
Abramo, G., D’angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2019). The collaboration behavior of top scientists. Scientometrics, 118, 215- 232.
|
|
Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from US universities, 1981–1999. Research policy, 34 (3), 259- 285.
|
|
Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 13- 30.
|
|
Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Kyvik, S. (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70, 689- 709.
|
|
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research policy, 33 (4), 599- 616.
|
|
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022). Helix trilogy: The triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13 (3), 2272- 2301.
|
|
Chan, H. F., Önder, A. S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception?. Scientometrics, 105, 2215- 2235.
|
|
Corrocher, N., & Lenzi, C. (2022). Exploring the sources of knowledge diversity in founding teams and its impact on new firms’ innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 32 (4), 1091- 1118.
|
|
De Lima Figueiredo, N., Fernandes, C. I., & Abrantes, J. L. (2023). Triple helix model: Cooperation in knowledge creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14 (2), 854- 878.
|
|
DeMarrais, E., & Earle, T. (2017). Collective action theory and the dynamics of complex societies. Annual review of anthropology, 46, 183- 201.
|
|
Eixeira de Melo A, Caves L S D, Dewitt A et al. (2020). Thinking (in) complexity: (In) definitions and (mis) conceptions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, (1), 154- 169.
|
|
Physics World. (2019). Preparing for a post-LHC future. https://physicsworld.com/a/preparing-for-a-post-lhc-future/.
|
|
Figueiredo, R., Soliman, M., Al-Alawi, A. N., & Fatnassi, T. (2023). Could the ‘Spinner Innovation’and ‘Triple Helix’Models Improve System Innovation?. Applied System Innovation, 6 (2), 42.
|
|
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359 (6379), eaao0185.
|
|
Geiger, R. L. (2017). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. New York: Routledge.
|
|
Geiger, R. L. (1990). Organized research units -their role in the development of university research. The Journal of Higher Education, 1—19.
|
|
Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the social sciences, 36 (1), 3- 17.
|
|
Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Stipelman, B. A., Stokols, D., Morgan, G., & Gehlert, S. (2012). A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies. Translational behavioral medicine, 2 (4), 415- 430.
|
|
Hallonsten O. P. (2016). Big science transformed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
|
|
Hallonsten, O. (2014). How scientists may‘benefit from the mess’: A resource dependence perspective on individual organizing in contemporary science. Social Science Information, 53 (3), 341- 362.
|
|
Hicks, D. J. (2021). Productivity and interdisciplinary impacts of Organized Research Units. Quantitative Science Studies, 2 (3), 990- 1022.
|
|
Laamanen, M., & Skålén, P. (2015). Collective–conflictual value co-creation: A strategic action field approach. Marketing Theory, 15 (3), 381- 400.
|
|
Martín-Sempere, M., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzón-García, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists. Case study of Spanish university researchers in Geology. Scientometrics, 55 (3), 377- 394.
|
|
Massimo Franceschet, Antonio Costantini. (2010), The effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers. Journal of Informetrics, (4), 540—553.
|
|
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research policy, 29 (1), 31- 40.
|
|
Mors, M. L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2021). Fast success and slow failure: the process speed of dispersed research teams. Research Policy, 50 (5), 104222.
|
|
Ooms, W., Werker, C., Caniëls, M. C., & Van Den Bosch, H. (2015). Research orientation and agglomeration: Can every region become a Silicon Valley?. Technovation, 45, 78- 92.
|
|
Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural economics, 41, 155- 166.
|
|
Perović, S., Radovanović, S., Sikimić, V., & Berber, A. (2016). Optimal research team composition: data envelopment analysis of Fermilab experiments. Scientometrics, 108, 83- 111.
|
|
Rajkumar, K., Saint-Jacques, G., Bojinov, I., Brynjolfsson, E., & Aral, S. (2022). A causal test of the strength of weak ties. Science, 377 (6612), 1304- 1310.
|
|
Shavinina, L. V. (2004). Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies, 15 (2), 243- 254.
|
|
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 41 (1), 643- 681.
|
|
Stvilia B, Hinnant C C, Schindler K, et al. (2011). Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (2), 270- 283.
|
|
Talke K, Salomo S, Rost K. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907—918.
|
|
Welch D, Yates L. (2018). The practices of collective action: Practice theory, sustainability transitions and social change. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48 (3), 288- 305.
|
|
Whittington K B. (2018). A tie is a tie? Gender and network positioning in life science inventor collaboration. Research Policy, 47 (2), 511- 526.
|
|
Yan L, Panteli N. (2011). Order and disorder in a Born Global organisation. New Technology. Work and Employment, 26 (2), 127- 145.
|