华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 13-29.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.09.002

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    下一篇

从《学位条例》到《学位法》:中国学位法治的成就、困境与展望

姚荣   

  1. 华东师范大学高等教育研究所,上海 200062
  • 接受日期:2025-05-09 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-08-25
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(教育学)青年课题“高等教育治理法律规制的规范释义与功能导向研究”(CIA230318)。

From the Regulations on Academic Degree to the Law on Academic Degree: Achievements, Dilemmas and Prospects of the Rule of Law on Academic Degree in China

Rong Yao   

  1. Institute of Higher education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Accepted:2025-05-09 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-08-25

摘要:

自1981年《学位条例》正式施行以来的四十余年里,学位政策创新、教育法的体系化发展与学位法律的司法适用,一定程度上弥补了《学位条例》的不足,缓解了立法有限性与实践丰富性之间的矛盾,形成了中国特色的学位法治发展道路。尽管如此,我国学位法治建设仍然面临着难以有效回应学位争议案件实质性化解的现实诉求,学位法律解释与适用的权威性与稳定性不足,以及难以满足学位法律制度体系化的需要等诸多现实困境与难题。鉴于此,在《学位条例》基础上制定《学位法》,对学位法律制度进行全面修订的呼声高涨。在《学位法》颁行的背景下,重塑与革新国家学位制度,促进学位法治与学术自治、国家调控与自我规制的平衡,增强《学位法》作为“组织法”“行为法” “程序法”“权利法”以及“规制法”的属性和功能,是中国学位治理迈向良法善治新境界的应有之义。

关键词: 《学位条例》, 《学位法》, 学术自治, 学位法治, 良法善治

Abstract:

Since the Regulations on Academic Degree came into force in 1981, the innovation of degree policies, the systematic development of education laws and the judicial application of degree laws, to a certain extent, have overcome the shortcomings of the Regulations on Academic Degree, alleviated the contradiction between the limited nature of legislation and the richness of practice, and formed the road of development of the rule of law on academic degree with Chinese characteristics. Nevertheless, the construction of the rule of law of degree in China still faces many practical dilemmas and problems, such as the difficulty with effectively responding to the real demand of substantive resolution of degree dispute cases, the insufficient authority and stability of the interpretation and application of degree laws, and the difficulty of meeting the needs of systematization of the degree legal system. In view of this, there is a strong call for the formulation of the Degree Law on the basis of the Degree Regulations and a comprehensive revision of the degree legal system. Against the background of the enactment of the Academic Degree Law, it is necessary to reshape and innovate the national degree system, promote the balance between the rule of law and academic autonomy, state regulation and self-regulation, and enhance the status of the Academic Degree Law as an “Organic law”, “behavioral law”, “procedural law”, and “procedural law”. It enhances the attributes and functions of the Degree Law and constitutes the rightful meaning for China’s degree governance to move into a new realm of good law and good governance. It constitutes the attributes and functions of China’s degree governance towards the new realm of good law and good governance.

Key words: Academic Degree ordinance, Academic Degree act, academic autonomy, rule of law for academic degree, good law and good governance