面向数字素养培育的数字创作：理论与实践

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.01.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

数字素养的培育刻不容缓。作为数字素养的高阶表现与重要的培育手段，数字创作已经成为了数字教育的关键议题。当前，我国的数字创作教育尚处于初步阶段，教育实施路径亟需系统化的理论指导与实践指引。在此背景下，本研究深入研讨了数字创作与数字素养的交织关系，梳理了数字创作从文本、程序进阶到多媒体、元宇宙的发展历程，构建了基于数字素养框架的数字创作概念内涵，并指明了其多模态、智能化、普惠性、个性化、拓展性的5大表现特征。在理论基础方面，本研究重点论述了建造主义和人机交互理论对于理解数字创作的重要价值。此外，本研究梳理了数字创作在教学中的3大范式：工具掌握的渐进训练、学科融合的转化学习与项目驱动的综合创作，为数字创作的实践落地提供参考。最后，本研究提出了数字创作在政策支持、研发支持和教学支持三方面的发展建议。

关键词: 数字创作, 数字素养, 建造主义, 人机交互

Abstract:

The cultivation of digital literacy is an urgent priority. As a higher-order manifestation and a key means of fostering digital literacy, digital creation has become a crucial topic in the realm of digital education. Currently, digital creation education in China remains at an initial stage, highlighting the need for systematic theoretical guidance and practical frameworks. In this context, the present study deeply discusses the interweaving relationship between digital creation and digital literacy, reviews the evolution of digital creation from text and programming to multimedia and the metaverse, constructing a conceptual understanding of digital creation based on a digital literacy framework. The study identifies five key characteristics of digital creation: multimodal, intelligentization, inclusiveness, personalization and expansibility. In terms of theoretical foundations, the research focuses on the importance of constructionism and human-computer interaction theory for understanding digital creation. Additionally, this study sorted out three paradigms of digital creation in teaching: progressive training of tool mastery, transformational learning of discipline integration and project-driven comprehensive creation, so as to provide reference for the practical implementation of digital creation. Finally, the research proposes strategic recommendations for the development of digital creation across three dimensions: policy support, technological infrastructure, and pedagogical approaches.

Key words: digital creation, digital literacy, constructionism, human-computer interaction

周均奕, 刘孛, 尚俊杰. 面向数字素养培育的数字创作：理论与实践[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2026, 44(1): 94-104.

Junyi ¹ Zhou, Bei ² Liu, Junjie ¹ Shang. Digital Creation for Digital Literacy Cultivation: Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2026, 44(1): 94-104.

图/表 2

参考文献 39

1	陈思维, 蔡达明. (2018). 多元智能理论视角下IPTV益智游戏开发的策略研究. 中国电化教育, 3, 127- 130.
2	杜希林, 孙鹏. (2022). 我国公共图书馆数字素养教育研究——基于数字时代全民数字素养教育的视角. 图书馆工作与研究, 7, 19- 26+53.
3	库伯. (2008). 体验学习——让体验成为学习和发展的源泉(王灿明, 朱水萍译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
4	李晓静, 刘祎宁, 冯紫薇. (2023). 我国青少年数字素养教育的现状问题与提升路径——基于东中西部中学生深度访谈的NVivo分析. 中国电化教育, 4, 32- 41.
5	李玉顺, 付苏豪, 安欣. (2023). 数字经济时代学生数字素养的培育——时代价值, 理论建构与实践进路. 中国电化教育, 9, 27- 33.
6	刘宝存, 易学瑾. (2024). 学生数字素养框架的国际经验与本土建议. 中国远程教育, 44 (10), 36- 45.
7	孙立会, 周丹华. (2019). 儿童编程教育溯源与未来路向——人工智能教育先驱派珀特的“齿轮”与“小精灵”. 现代教育技术, 29 (10), 12- 19.
8	唐纳德·诺曼. (2015). 设计心理学: 日常的设计 (小柯, 译). 北京: 中信出版社.
9	赵亚楠, 王磊. (2024). 项目式学习中学生合作问题解决能力模型的建构和意义. 课程. 教材. 教法, 44 (04), 110- 117+132.
10	郑东辉. (2004). 社会建构主义学习理论述评. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 6, 35- 38.
11	朱红艳, 蒋鑫. (2019). 国内数字素养研究综述. 图书馆工作与研究, 8, 52- 59.
12	Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation, 57 (2), 218- 259.
13	Churchill, N. (2020). Development of students' digital literacy skills through digital storytelling with mobile devices. Educational media international, 57 (3), 271- 284.
14	Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
15	Ding, A. C. E., Yu, C. H. (2024). Serious game-based learning and learning by making games: Types of game-based pedagogies and student gaming hours impact students' science learning outcomes. Computers & education, 218, 105075.
16	Downey, R. J., Youmans, K., Villanueva Alarcón, I., Nadelson, L., & Bouwma-Gearhart, J. (2022). Building Knowledge Structures in Context: An Exploration of How Constructionism Principles Influence Engineering Student Learning Experiences in Academic Making Spaces. Education sciences, 12 (11), 733.
17	Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13 (1), 93- 106.
18	Fokides, E. (2017). Students Learning to Program by Developing Games: Results of a Year-long Project in Primary School Settings. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16 (1), 475- 505.
19	Hsu, H., Wenting, Z., Hughes, J. (2019). Developing Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy Through Augmented Reality Creation: Insights From a Longitudinal Analysis of Questionnaires, Interviews, and Projects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57 (6), 1400- 1435.
20	Jong, M. S. Y., Tsai, C. C. (2016). Understanding the concerns of teachers about leveraging mobile technology to facilitate outdoor social inquiry learning: the eduventure experience. Interactive learning environments, 24 (2), 328- 344.
21	Kafai, Y. B., Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist Gaming: Understanding the Benefits of Making Games for Learning. Educational Psychologist, 50 (4), 313- 334.
22	Knobel, M. , & Lankshear, C. (2008). Digital literacy and participation in online social networking spaces. In Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 249–278). New York: Peter Lang.
23	Langbeheim, E., Abrashkin, A., Steiner, A., et al. (2020). Shifting the learning gears: Redesigning a project-based course on soft matter through the perspective of constructionism. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16 (2), 020147.
24	Li, H. , Guo, R. , Li, C. L. , Xing, W. L. (2024). Automated Quality Assessment of Multimodal Mathematical Stories Generated by Generative Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Learning (pp. 110-121). New York: Assoc Computing Machinery.
25	List, A. (2019). Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education, 138, 146- 158.
26	López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., et al. (2020). University students' digital competence in three areas of the DigCom 2. 1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (3), 69- 88.
27	Lye, S. Y., Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12?. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51- 61.
28	Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56 (2), 429- 440.
29	Martin, A., Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovations in teaching and learning in information and computer sciences, 5 (4), 249- 267.
30	Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
31	Norman, D. A. (1992). Design principles for cognitive artifacts. Research in engineering design, 4 (1), 43- 50.
32	Nousiainen, T., Kangas, M., Rikala, J., & Vesisenaho, M. (2018). Teacher competencies in game-based pedagogy. Teaching and teacher education, 74, 85- 97.
33	Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2019). Exploring children's learning experience in constructionism-based coding activities through design-based research. Computers in human behavior, 99, 415- 427.
34	Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism, In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds. ), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35	Pearson, H. A., & Dubé, A. K. (2022). 3D printing as an educational technology: theoretical perspectives, learning outcomes, and recommendations for practice. Education and information technologies, 27 (3), 3037- 3064.
36	Peppler, K., Keune, A., Thompson, N., et al. (2022). Craftland is Mathland: Mathematical insight and the generative role of fiber crafts in maker education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1029175.
37	Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., et al. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48 (2), 462- 472.
38	Vuorikari, R. , Kluzer, S. , & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens. Retrieved from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128415.
39	Wagh, A., Cook‐Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry‐based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of research in science teaching, 54 (5), 615- 641.

[1]	靳彤, 李亚芬. 理解数字化时代的学校公共空间——教育数字化转型的实践难题[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(3): 45-51.
[2]	王琳, 陈泓舟, 蔡玮. 元宇宙中的教育：现状与革新的未来[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(11): 38-51.