基于视频的学习过程分析:为什么?如何做?

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.05.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经过40多年的发展，基于视频的实证研究已经成为教育研究——尤其是对学习过程的研究——的主流取径之一。然而，对于为什么要运用视频，如何对视频进行分析，学界仍然见解不一。本文在梳理相关历史和理论的基础上，通过两个案例呈现视频分析的三个重要维度，即个人的身体、社会的身体、身体与物件的互动。本文指出，这三个维度根本性地影响着我们对课堂互动、学习过程、教学机制的分析、理解与阐释，而视频数据在其中起到了不可或缺的作用。最后，本文强调，为了发掘视频研究的潜力，教育工作者需要从理论视角上扭转"语言中心论"的偏见，探索教师对自己课堂的评价权，并且尊重课堂生活世界中的"日用行常"。

关键词: 课堂视频, 课堂话语, 课堂互动, 视频分析, 互动分析

Abstract: After more than four decades of development, video-based analysis has become a major approach in educational research, in particular analysis of learning processes. Yet, with regard to the "why" and the "how-to," video researchers have not achieved a consensus. Based on a brief review of history and relevant theories, this article uses two case studies to illustrate three crucial aspects of video-based analysis:the individual body, the social bodies, and the bodies-things interaction. We argue that these aspects profoundly shape our analyses and understandings of classroom interaction, learning processes, and mechanism of teaching, and that video data play a critical role therein. Finally, we argue that educators and educational researchers need to avoid the bias of logocentrism, to empower teachers to evaluate their own classroom, and to respect the everyday workings of classroom life-worlds, if we are to fully appreciate the potential of video-based analysis.

Key words: classroom video, classroom discourse, classroom interaction, video-based analysis, interaction analysis

肖思汉, 德利马. 基于视频的学习过程分析:为什么?如何做?[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(5): 55-71+160.

XIAO Sihan, David J. DeLiema. Video-based Analysis of Learning Processes:Rationale and Method[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(5): 55-71+160.

参考文献

Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction:Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.). Constructionism in practice (pp. 25-35). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning:What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive psychology, 25, 468-523.
Alibali, M. W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K. O., Syc, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10(4), 327-333.
Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, R. B., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. J. (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture:A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32(1), 65-100.
Bakhtin, M. (1982). The dialogic imagination:Four essays. Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(4), 637-660.
Becvar, L. A., Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2005). Hands as molecules:Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica, (156), 89-112.
Bezemer, J., & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice:A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 191-206.
Bolden, G. B. (2009). Implementing incipient actions:The discourse marker "so" in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 974-998.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse:The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2016). Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 257-270.
Cienki, A., &Mu?ller, C. (2008). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In R. W. J. Gibbs. (Eds.).The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 483-501). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Colella, V. (2000). Participatory simulations:Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471-500.
Cook, S. W., Friedman, H. S., Duggan, K. A., Cui, J., &Popescu, V. (2016). Hand gesture and mathematics learning:Lessons from an avatar. Cognitive science, 41, 518-535.
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2012). Viewpoint in language:A multimodal perspective. Chicago, IL:Cambridge University Press.
DeLiema, D., & Steen, F. F. (2014). Thinking with the body:conceptual integration through gesture in multiviewpoint model construction. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, Hinnell, J. (Eds.).Language and the Creative Mind (pp. 275-294). Stanford, CA:CSLI Publications.
DeLiema, D., Saleh, A., Lee, C., Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Illum, R., Dahn, M., Humburg, M., & Mahoney, C. (2016). Blending play and inquiry in augmented reality:A comparison of playing a video game to playing within a participatory model. In C-K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.).Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 450-457). Singapore:International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., … Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences:Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.
Emmorey, K., & Casey, S. (2001). Gesture, thought, and spatial language. Gesture, 1, 35-50.
Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 347-378.
Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7-34.
Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory:Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA:Polity Press.
Erickson, F. (2011). Uses of video in social research:A brief history. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 179-189.
Erickson, F. & Wilson, J. (1982). Sights and sources of life in schools:A resource guide to film and videotape for research and education. East Lansing, MI:Institute for Research on Teaching.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In E. Goldberg Adele (Ed.).Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113-130). Stanford, CA:CSLI Publications.
Flood, V. J., Abrahamson, D. (2015, April). Refining mathematical meanings throughmultimodal revoicing interactions:The case of "faster." Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the American Educational Research Association (Special Interest Group:Semiotics in Education:Signs, Meanings, Multimodality). Chicago:IL, April 16-20.
Gerofsky, S. (2010). Mathematical learning and gesture:Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students' gestured graphs of functions. Gesture, 10(2), 321-343.
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture's role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 257-283.
Goldman, R., Barron, B., Pea, R., & Derry, S. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.).Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195-212). Amsterdam, The Netherlands:John Benjamins.
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.). Everyday Language:Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York, NY:Irvington Publishers.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity:Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton. (Eds.). Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283-307.
Green, J. L. (1983). Research on teaching as a linguistic process:A state of the art. Review of Research in Education, 10(1), 151-252.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
Hutchins, E. (1996). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin& J. Lave. (Eds.).Understanding practice:Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35-63). Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage. (Eds.). Structures of Social Action:Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. ix-xvi). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis:Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation spatial ability's unique role. Psychological science, 24(9), 1831-1836.
Kirsh, D. (2012). How marking in dance constitutes thinking with the body. Versus:Quaderni di StudiSemiotici, 113-115, 179-210.
Kita, S., &?zyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and language, 48(1), 16-32.
Kohn, E. (2013.) How forests think:Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst's manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel's policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. Derry. (Eds.). Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 133-143). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Latour, B. (1996a). On actor-network theory:A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369-381.
Latour, B. (1996b).On interobjectivity.Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(4),228-245.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social:An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70-88.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press.
Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and instruction, 16(2), 119-172.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schiefelin (Eds.) Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York, NY:Academic Press.
Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). "When I come down I'm in the domain state":Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.). Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks:Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.). Discourse, Learning, and Schooling (pp. 63-103). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
O'Meara, C., &Báez, G. P. (2011). Spatial frames of reference in Mesoamerican languages. Language Sciences, 33(6), 837-852.
Parrill, F. (2009). Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture, 9(3), 271-289.
Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules:Induction and fallback. Cognitive science, 20(4), 457-497.
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education,20(2), 163-183.
Sherin, M., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37.
Solnit, R. (2003). River of shadows:Eadweard Muybridge and the technological wild west. New York, NY:Viking Penguin.
Stec, K. (2012). Meaningful shifts:A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 327-360.
Xiao, S. (2015). Children's use of inscriptions in argumentation about socioscientific issues(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

[1]	夏雪梅, 方超群, 刘潇. 教师具有“以学为中心”的专业眼光吗：基于视频俱乐部的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(11): 90-100.
[2]	邵发仙, 胡卫平, 张睆, 张艳红, 首新. 课堂论证话语的序贯分析:小学生的科学推理[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(6): 48-60.
[3]	夏雪梅. 在传统课堂中进行指向高阶思维和社会性发展的话语变革[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(5): 105-114.
[4]	孙丽丽. 基于文件阐释法的视频分析与课堂模仿研究——兼论视频分析的方法论意义[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(5): 72-86+160+161.
[5]	郑太年, 仝玉婷. 课堂视频分析:理论进路、方法与应用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(3): 126-133+172+173.