华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 19-30.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.003

• 高等工程教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美研究型大学工程教育制度与理念研究——基于语料库的批判话语分析方法

曾开富1, 王孙禺2, 陈丽萍2   

  1. 1. 北京化工大学高等教育研究所，北京 100029
    2. 清华大学教育研究院，北京 100084
  • 接受日期:2022-05-30 出版日期:2022-08-01 发布日期:2022-07-26
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“美国的‘新工科’建设研究”（21YJC880004）；北京化工大学研究生教改项目

Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Self-introduction Corpus from Engineering Departments of Research Universities in China and USA

Kaifu Zeng1, Sunyu Wang2, Liping Chen2   

  1. 1. Institute of Higher Education, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    2. Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Accepted:2022-05-30 Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-07-26

RichHTML

47

PDF

296

摘要：

本文从中美研究型大学官方主页整理其工学系自我介绍文本并建立语料库，然后采用批判话语分析方法研究两国工学系的热词、词丛等话语方式。研究表明，两国工程教育的话语方式因为职称与学术头衔制度、学位制度、奖励制度等制度原因而具有很高的相似性。在此基础上，本文对工程、研究、工程师等核心概念进行了分析。研究发现，“工程师”一词在两国工程教育界都并不是热词。

关键词: 研究型大学, 工程教育, 语料库, 批判话语分析

Abstract:

This paper researches what research universities’ engineering departments in USA and China frequently talk about in their self-introduction texts which are built as a corpus. Critical discourse analysis is used to find the hot words, word clusters and so on. The research finds that, first, the discourse mode of engineering education in the two countries is highly similar because of the title system, degree system and reward system. Second, in terms of educational concept, there are similarities and differences between the two countries in understanding the core concepts of engineering, research and engineer. Finally,the word “engineer” is not a hot word in the engineering education of both countries where engineers are educated.

Key words: research university, engineering education, corpus of self-introduction texts, critical discourse analysis