教育评价

幼儿园教师“幼儿学习研究与支持”能力测评工具的研制

  • 孙蔷蔷
展开
  • 中国教育科学研究院 基础教育研究所 北京 100088

网络出版日期: 2022-12-03

基金资助

国家社会科学基金教育学国家青年课题“县域学前教育高质量发展评价指标体系研究(CGA220303)”

Development of Competency Assessment Tool for “Studying and Supporting Early Childhood Learning ” for Kindergarten Teachers

  • Qiangqiang Sun
Expand
  • Research Centre for Basic Education, National Institute of Educational Science, Beijing 100088, China

Online published: 2022-12-03

摘要

“幼儿学习研究与支持”是幼儿园教师应具备的核心能力,研制幼儿园教师“幼儿学习研究与支持”能力测评工具有助于科学诊断和促进教师专业发展。基于COMET工作分析法和行为整合分类学等理论,建构了由能力维度、指标和四级水平组成的能力测评工具,测量学属性检验结果表明,测评工具的难度、区分度以及等级划分较为合理,具有较好的内部一致性,验证性因素分析表明理论模型与观测数据拟合情况较好,具有较高的结构效度,可见测评工具质量较高、性能良好,可以作为教师自我评价的工具,对幼儿园教师、幼儿园管理者、教师教育院校和教育行政部门具有较高的应用价值。

本文引用格式

孙蔷蔷 . 幼儿园教师“幼儿学习研究与支持”能力测评工具的研制[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022 , 40(12) : 91 -102 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.12.008

Abstract

Studying and supporting early childhood learning is the core competence that kindergarten teachers should possess. The development of an assessment tool will help scientifically diagnose and promote teacher professional development. Based on the COMET work analysis method and behavior integration taxonomy, the study constructs an assessment tool composed of competence dimensions, indicators, and four levels. The surveying attribute test results show that the difficulty, discrimination, and grade division of the evaluation tools are reasonable and have good internal consistency. The confirmatory factor analysis shows that the theoretical model fits well with the observation data and has a high structural effect. It can be seen that the evaluation tools are of high quality and good performance, which can be used as a tool for teacher self-evaluation, and has high application value for kindergarten teachers, kindergarten managers and education administration departments.

参考文献

null 冯晓霞. (2012). 幼儿园教师的专业知识. 学前教育研究, (10), 3?12
null 侯典牧, 傅家荣. (2012). 人员素质测评. 北京: 科学出版社.
null 霍力岩. (2001). 教育的转型与教师角色的转换. 教育研究, (3), 70- 71.
null 刘焱. (2009). 对我国学前教育几个基本问题的探讨——兼谈我国学前教育未来发展思路. 教育发展研究, (8), 1- 6.
null 王策三. (1983). 论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位. 新课程教学, (1), 126- 128.
null Chambers, M. A., & Graham, R. A. (1971). Competence: The measure of tomorrow's teacher. Peabody Journal of Education, 48 (3), 218- 227.
null Hauenstein, A. D. (1998). A conceptual framework for educational objectives: A holistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Lanham: University Press of America.
null Lewis, C. C. , Takahashi, A. , Murata, A. , & King, E. (2003). Developing “the eyes to see students”: Data collection during lesson study. In Research Presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics, San Antonio, TX.
null Morgeson, F. P. , Brannick, M. T. , & Levine, E. L. (2019). Job and work analysis: Methods, research, and applications for human resource management. London: Sage Publications.
null Nelson, O., & Halfin, H. (1982). Emerging Skills: Implications for Vocational Education. Information Series No. 234, 7- 8.
null New South Wales Institute of Teachers. (2003). Professional teaching standards. Retrieved from: https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/wcm/connect/9ba4a706-221f-413c-843b-d5f390c2109f/australian-professional-standards-teachers.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. 2021−12−01
null Singapore institute of directors. (2014)Continuing professional development. Retrieved from: https://www.sid.org.sg/Web/Resources/Continuing_Professional_Development.aspx. 2021−12−01
文章导航

/