教育公平

学生眼中的教育公平是什么?——基于实验研究的证据

  • 黄忠敬 ,
  • 吴洁 ,
  • 高星原
展开
  • 华东师范大学教育学系,上海 200062

网络出版日期: 2021-01-18

基金资助

华东师范大学“幸福之花”基金先导项目“基于素质教育目标的社会情感能力研究与测评”(课题号:2019ECNU-XFZH011);上海市高峰学科建设教育学教育公平实验室课题

What is Equity from Students’ Perspective: Evidence from the Experiment Research

  • Zhongjing Huang ,
  • Jie Wu ,
  • Xingyuan Gao
Expand
  • Department of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Online published: 2021-01-18

摘要

本文运用实验研究的方法,通过利益相关者和旁观者游戏,对小学、初中和高中不同年龄阶段的667名学生的公平偏好进行实验研究,探索学生眼中的公平观,分析学生公平偏好的影响因素。研究发现,中小学不同年龄学生的公平偏好是发展性的,学生最初倾向于均等主义的公平观,随着年龄的增长以及受到同伴关系、认知发展、社会经验等因素的影响,学生越来越倾向于接受由运气、绩效和效率导致的不平等,体现了差异化的公平观。家庭背景与学校教育在塑造儿童公平偏好过程中均起到重要的作用。家长的学历和教育水平会影响儿童的公平偏好,父母学历越高,学生越容易接受由运气导致的不平等分配。中国比较独特的班干部制度的育人价值不仅体现在班级管理与领导力提升等方面,也体现在塑造儿童不同的公平偏好上。因此教育者在不同的年级针对不同年龄的学生要考虑到不同的公平策略。

本文引用格式

黄忠敬 , 吴洁 , 高星原 . 学生眼中的教育公平是什么?——基于实验研究的证据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021 , 39(1) : 107 -115 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.009

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the developmental levels of students’ equity preferences and influence factors by using stakeholder and spectator game in experimental economic. The result shows that student’s equity preferences change with age, peer relationship, cognition and social experience, from egalitarianism to meritocratism and efficiency. Students can accept more and more inequity allocation based on luck, merit and efficiency difference. Family background and schooling are important factors to impact students' equity preferences. The implication of this study is that educators should consider the different educational equity strategies for different students of ages in schools and families.

参考文献

null 陈童, 伍珍. 儿童的分配公平性: 心理理论的作用. 心理科学进展, (2017). 25 (08), 1299- 1309.
null 罗尔斯. (2001). 正义论(何怀宏 等译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
null 桑德尔. (2011). 公正(朱慧玲 译). 北京: 中信出版社.
null 苏彦捷, 张慧, 张康. 社会决策: 自我利益与他人利益的权衡. 心理科学, (2012). 35 (06), 1423- 1428.
null Alm?s, I., Cappelen, A. W., Salvanes, K. G., Sorensen, E., Tungodden, B.. Fairness and Family Background. Politics Philosophy & Economics, (2017). 16 (2), 117- 131.
null Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2016). Cutthroat Capitalism Versus Cuddly Socialism: Are Americans More Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking than Scandinavians? SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2879358.
null Alm?s, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sorenson, E., Tungodden, B.. Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, (2010). 328 (5982), 1176- 1178.
null Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, (2010). 77 (5), 1607- 1636.
null Banerjee, R. Audience effects on self-presentation in childhood. Review of Social Development, (2002). 11 (4), 487- 507.
null Benensona, J. F. Pascoe, J., Radmore. N. Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, (2007). 28, 168- 175.
null Blake, P. R., Rand. D.G. Currency value moderates equity preference among young children. Evolution & Human Behavior, (2010). 31 (3), 210- 218.
null Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review, (2000). 90, 166- 193.
null Cappelen, A. W., List, J. A., Samek, A., & Tungodden, B. (2016). The effect of early education on social preferences (No. w22898). National Bureau of Economic Research.
null Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. X. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, (2007). 33 (1), 67- 80.
null Engelmann, Jan & Tomasello, Michael. (2019). Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.001.
null Fehr, E., Bernhard, H. & Rockenbach, B. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, (2008). 454 (7208), 1079- 1083.
null Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, (1999). 114, 817- 868.
null Guo, X.. Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context. NeuroImage, (2013). 77, 246- 253.
null Kogut, T. Knowing what I should, doing what I want: From selfishness to inequity aversion in young children's sharing behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, (2012). 33, 226- 236.
null Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, (2007). 21 (2), 153- 174.
null Rilling, J. K. & Sanfey, A.G. The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, (2011). 62, 23- 48.
null Rochat P, Dias MDG, Liping G, Broesch T, Passos-Ferreira C, et al. Fairness in distributive justice by 3- and 5-year-olds across 7 cultures. J Cross Cult Psychol, (2009). 40, 416- 442.
null Rutland, A., & Killen, M. Fair resource allocation among children and adolescents: the role of group and developmental processes. Child Development Perspectives, (2017). 11 (1), 56- 62.
null Shaw, A., Montinari, N., Piovesan, M., Olson, K. R., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. Children develop a veil of fairness. J Exp Psychol Gen, (2014). 143 (1), 363- 375.
null Sun, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., and Lu, J. Increased social distance makes people more risk neutral. J. Soc. Psychol., (2016). 157, 502- 512.
null Yu, J., Zhu, L., & Leslie, A. M. Children's sharing behavior in mini-dictator games: the role of in-group favoritism and theory of mind. Child Development, (2016). 87 (6), 1747- 1757.
文章导航

/