Interdisciplinary and Critical Concerns: Current Comparative Education Research in the United Kingdom — Also on the Construction of Independent Knowledge System of Comparative Education in China

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.09.006

Abstract

Abstract:

In the era of globalization, China’s comparative education still lacks local theory and methodology construction. The research theme focuses on national strategy, but lacks theoretical perspectives and various methods. Exploring the current research situation of comparative education in the UK can provide reference for China. By analyzing the research data of 548 comparative education researchers from the top 72 universities in the UK, this paper finds that comparative education research in the UK focuses on global and transnational education issues, pays attention to marginalized countries and groups, applies interdisciplinary theories and methods, and aims to construct and innovate global theories with critical concerns. Considering the current situation of comparative education research in China, China should seek a balance between policy consultation and knowledge production, establish transnational interdisciplinary teams, innovate theories and methods, attach importance to theoretical criticism and local independent theoretical construction, so as to contribute Chinese experience to global education.

Key words: Britain comparative education, comparative education, interdisciplinary, critical concerns

Dan Zhang, Junling Han, Xiang Xia, Siyan He. Interdisciplinary and Critical Concerns: Current Comparative Education Research in the United Kingdom — Also on the Construction of Independent Knowledge System of Comparative Education in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(9): 74-88.

Figures/Tables 6

References 69

1	蔡娟.. (2019). 论中国比较教育研究的未来转向——基于人类命运共同体理念的分析. 外国教育研究, 46 (02), 27- 38.
2	常甜, 马早明.. (2023). 试论叙事研究方法论与当代中国比较教育研究的关涉. 比较教育研究, 45 (09), 69- 77.
3	陈时见, 王远.. (2019). 比较教育学科发展的历史演进及未来走向. 教育研究, 40 (01), 55- 65.
4	陈时见, 谭丹.. (2020). 论比较教育研究的“空间转向”. 比较教育研究, 42 (06), 19- 25.
5	邓莉, 王超男, 金秋.. (2024). 英国比较教育学研究范式的60年演化. 比较教育研究, 46 (01), 90- 101.
6	范国睿等.. (2016). 研究引领变革: 美国教育研究新趋向—基于美国教育学者公共影响力排名的研究领域与领军人物分析. 教育研究, 1 (432), 126- 142.
7	付淑琼, 胡晨.. (2023). 超越描述: 比较教育研究的逻辑起点. 比较教育研究, 45 (10), 21- 30.
8	付淑琼, 胡晨.. (2024). 比较教育研究的国际发展趋势—基于两种学术期刊三十年的载文分析. 比较教育研究, 46 (04), 72- 82.
9	高皇伟.. (2019). 论“比较历史分析”与比较教育学科发展. 比较教育研究, 41 (09), 52- 59.
10	顾明远.. (2005). 关于比较教育学科建设的几个问题. 比较教育研究, 27 (3), 1- 4.
11	顾明远.. (2018). 新时代比较教育的新使命—纪念改革开放40周年. 比较教育研究, 40 (08), 3- 4.
12	胡昳昀, 范丽珺, 王志伟.. (2022). “强国梦”背景下巴西高等教育战略选择与发展困境. 比较教育研究, 44 (12), 79- 87.
13	贾瑞棋, 梁荣华.. (2024). 迈向中观: 比较教育研究中的机制解释. 比较教育研究, 46 (01), 102- 112.
14	贾瑞棋.. (2023). 摇晃的钟摆: 西方比较教育研究范式的演进—基于知识-权力视角的解读. 比较教育研究, 45 (02), 12- 22.
15	李荣安, 苏洋, 刘宝存.. (2017). 制度化与语境化: 比较教育研究的辩证法. 比较教育研究, 39 (09), 31- 40.
16	李莎.. (2023). 英国教育数据隐私安全防治实践研究. 中国教育信息化, 29 (05), 65- 72.
17	刘宝存, 康云菲.. (2024). 教育现代化的国际经验与中国探索. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 74 (01), 64- 73.
18	刘宝存, 彭婵娟.. (2022). 知识生产模式转型与比较教育学科发展路径变迁. 外国教育研究, 49 (03), 3- 16.
19	刘宝存, 王婷钰.. (2021). 人类命运共同体理念下的比较教育: 可为、应为与何为. 比较教育研究, 43 (08), 3- 11.
20	马青.. (2019). 理想与现实: 沙特阿拉伯王国高等教育国际化发展研究. 比较教育研究, 41 (06), 50- 57+66.
21	三好大树, 高益民.. (2024). 日本学校撤并的多主体决策参与研究—基于理性选择制度主义视角. 比较教育研究, 46 (02), 74- 82+102.
22	滕珺, 龚凡舒.. (2023). 中国比较教育学科发展的文化品格. 比较教育研究, 45 (10), 3- 12.
23	滕珺, 肖甦.. (2021). 新中国成立后比较教育学科的创立与发展. 比较教育研究, 43 (09), 19- 28.
24	汪卫平, 姜晓晖, 张成龙.. (2022). 性别平等悖论: 全球青少年数字性别鸿沟及其性别文化解释——基于PISA2018数据的跨国(区)分析. 外国教育研究, 49 (04), 19- 35.
25	王英杰.. (2015). 试论比较教育在中国的学科地位—纪念《比较教育研究》发刊50周年. 比较教育研究, 37 (09), 6- 10.
26	王英杰.. (2017). 民族国家、全球化与比较教育学: 问题、冲突与挑战. 比较教育研究, 39 (12), 3- 6.
27	杨明全, 陈川南.. (2022). 试论比较教育研究理论取向: 话语争鸣及超越. 比较教育研究, 44 (01), 41- 49.
28	杨明全.. (2016). 超越传统: 走向批判与本土化的比较教育学. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 33 (4), 23- 29.
29	杨修平, 万秀兰.. (2020). “一带一路”倡议下的比较教育研究方法论追问—基于15种教育类CSSCI期刊的文献回溯. 比较教育研究, 42 (06), 11- 18.
30	祝刚, 王语婷.. (2022). 论比较教育学的后殖民主义转向及其价值意蕴. 比较教育研究, 44 (05), 13- 24.
31	祝刚, 史可媛.. (2023). 全球化时代处于十字路口的比较教育学—卡洛斯•托雷斯比较教育思想探赜. 外国教育研究, 50 (05), 3- 20.
32	Aikman, S. (2023). Hidden, scattered and reconstructed: indigenous lifeways, knowledges and intergenerational learning. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1—18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03057925.2023.2234276?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
33	Al Azmeh, Z., & Dillabough, J. -A. (2023). Authorial power, authoritarianism, and exiled intellectuals: Syria and Turkey. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 37(1), 1—27.
34	Auld, E., & Morris, P.. (2014). Comparative education, the “New Paradigm” and policy borrowing: Constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50 (2), 129- 155.
35	Beigel, F.. (2014). Introduction: current tensions and trends in the World Scientific System. Current Sociology, 62 (5), 617- 625.
36	Chen, K. -H. (2010). Asia as Method: Towards Deimperialization. Duke University Press.
37	Cowen, R.. (2014). Ways of knowing, outcomes and “comparative education”: Be careful what you pray for. Comparative Education, 50 (3), 282- 301.
38	Cowen, R.. (2020). Changing comparative education: Interpreting foreigners, routinising research, and writing history. Comparative Education, 56 (1), 127- 141.
39	Cowen, R. (2023). Comparative education: And now? Comparative Education, 59(3), 326—340.
40	Crossley, M.. (2008). Bridging cultures and traditions for educational and international development: Comparative research, dialogue and difference. International Review of Education, 54 (3), 319- 336.
41	Dale, R.. (2015). Conjunctions of power and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45 (3), 341- 362.
42	Department for Education. (2024-04-03). Data protection policies and procedures. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/data-protection-in-schools/data-protection-policies-and-procedures.
43	Dillabough, J. -A. (2022). Higher education, violent modernities and the “global present”: The paradox of politics and new populist imaginaries in HE. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2), 178—192.
44	Hartmann, E. (2017). Quality assurance and the shift towards private governance in higher education: Europeanisation through the back door? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 309—324.
45	Hartmann, E.. (2021). The shadow sovereigns of global education policy: A critique of the world society approach. Journal of Education Policy, 36 (3), 367- 392.
46	International Education and Social Change. (2024-05-29). https://www.uea.ac.uk/about/school-of-education-and-lifelong-learning/research/international-education-and-social-change.
47	Jules, Deryck, T. & Salajan, F. D.. (2024). Navigating an Unbridled World: A transformational era ahead for comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 68 (1), 1- 14.
48	Kim, T.. (2014). The intellect, mobility and epistemic positioning in doing comparisons and comparative education. Comparative Education, 50 (1), 58- 72.
49	Kim, T.. (2023). Knowledge and identity on the move: The three elements affecting comparative education. Scuola Democratica, (3), 443- 462.
50	Larsen, M. A., & Beech, J.. (2014). Spatial theorizing in comparative and international education research. Comparative Education Review, 58 (2), 191- 214.
51	Manzon, M.. (2018). Comparative education histories: A postscript. Comparative Education, 54 (1), 94- 107.
52	Marginson, S.. (2022a). Global science and national comparisons: Beyond bibliometrics and scientometrics. Comparative Education, 58 (2), 125- 146.
53	Marginson, S.. (2022b). Space and scale in higher education: The glonacal agency heuristic revisited. Higher Education, 84 (6), 1365- 1395.
54	Marginson, S.. (2022c). “All things are in flux”: China in global science. Higher Education, 83 (4), 881- 910.
55	Marginson, S. (2023). Limitations of the leading definition of “internationalization” of higher education: Is the idea wrong or is the fault in reality? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 21(10), 1—20.
56	Marginson, S., & Xu, X.. (2023). Hegemony and inequality in global science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67 (1), 31- 52.
57	McNess, E., Arthur, L., & Crossley, M.. (2015). “Ethnographic dazzle” and the construction of the “Other”: Revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45 (2), 295- 316.
58	Mitchell, R. , Lalli, G. , Cameron, L. , & Bartram, B. (2021). Teaching comparative and international education in the UK: A national survey of undergraduate programmes. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/283755842/Teaching_Comparative_and_International_Education_in_the_UK_a_national_survey_of_undergraduate_programmes.pdf.
59	Monkman, K.. (2022). Recognizing complexity in our changing contexts: Centering what matters in comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 66 (4), 573- 598.
60	Nadarajan, D. (2022). The zombification crisis in a crisis: Neoliberal battles and teacher survivors in the pandemic. In A. W. Wiseman (Ed. ), Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2021 (pp. 149-157). Emerald Group Publishing.
61	Phillips, D.. (2014). “Comparatography”, history and policy quotation: some reflections. Comparative Education, 50 (1), 73- 83.
62	Post, D.. (2020). After progress. Comparative Education Review, 64 (4), 563- 576.
63	Robertson, S. L. , & Dale, R. (2015). Towards a “critical cultural political economy” account of the globalising of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 149—170.
64	Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Białowolski, P.. (2016). Factors and conditions promoting academic resilience: A TIMSS-based analysis of five Asian education systems. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17 (3), 511- 520.
65	Tikly, L.. (2015). What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning in international and comparative education. International Journal of Educational Development, 40 (1), 237- 249.
66	Tikly, L., & Crossley, M.. (2001). Teaching comparative and international education: A framework for analysis. Comparative Education Review, 45 (4), 561- 580.
67	Trafí-Prats, L.. (2019). Fugitive pedagogies: Decolonising Black childhoods in the Anthropocene. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41 (3), 359- 371.
68	Wiseman, A. W., Astiz, M. F., & Baker, D. P.. (2014). Comparative education research framed by neo-institutional theory: a review of diverse approaches and conflicting assumptions. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44 (5), 688- 709.
69	Wu, J. , & Robertson, S. L. (2024). Civilisational “ideas”, state power, and globalising “realities”: Structuring mechanisms shaping contemporary higher education outcomes in China. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 22(1), 1—17.

[1]	Gang Zhu, Lingshuai Kong, Qiguang Yang, Tianyi Wu. From Nationalism to Cosmopolitanism: A Shift in The Methodology of Comparative Education Research [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(9): 89-102.
[2]	Wei Shen, Xinyue Zhou, Zhiwei Jiang. Comparative Education and Human Development: Progress in the New Century [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(9): 56-73.
[3]	Zhengmei Peng, Lisha Chen, Yuezhu Wu, Fangting Shi, Li Deng. Towards a Shared “World Literature”: On the New Mission of Chinese Comparative Education in the Dialectic of Enlightenment and Culture [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(9): 42-55.
[4]	Jing Zhu, Xuefeng Jiang. The Roles and Functions of Scientists Engaging in Science Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(8): 50-63.
[5]	Dan Zhang, Susan Robertson. The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Research [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(7): 114-126.
[6]	Shuhui Li, Shang Li, Lianghuo Fan. Should Calculators Be Allowed to Use in College Entrance Examinations in Mathematics: An International Comparison of 30 Countries and Regions’ Calculator Use Policies and Practices in College Entrance Examinations [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(4): 83-92.
[7]	Dequan Zhu, Hongli Peng. An Empirical Study on the Evaluation Model of Teacher’s Interdisciplinary Instruction Competency [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(2): 1-13.
[8]	Iveta Silova. Anticipating Other Worlds, Animating Our Selves: An Invitation to Comparative Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(3): 42-56.
[9]	GAO Yunfeng, SHI Baoguo. Integration of Maker Education and STEAM Education: An Interdisciplinary Perspective of Innovation [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(4): 47-53+135.
[10]	Center of Collaborative Innovation on Youth Legal Education by MOE (ECNU). Managing School Bullying: A Cross-disciplinary Dialogue [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(2): 12-23+115.
[11]	YANG Ming-Quan. Beyond Tradition: Toward a Critical and Nation-Oriented Comparative Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2015, 33(4): 23-29.