马西娅·C.林,巴特-舍瓦·艾伦.(2016).学科学和教科学:利用技术促进知识整合(裴新宁,刘新阳等译).上海:华东师范大学出版社. 教育部.(2011). 初中科学教育标准(修订稿). 北京:北京师范大学出版社. 教育部.(2016).教育信息化"十三五"规划[EB/OL]. (2016-06-07)[2017-05-23].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201606/t20160622_269367.html. 李雁冰. (2012).我国科学课程教学的困境与超越.教育研究与实验,(5),69-74. 刘新阳.(2016)."教师-资源"互动视角下的教师教学设计能力研究(博士学位论文). 上海:华东师范大学. 美国国家研究理事会.(1999).美国国家科学教育标准(戢守志等译).科学与技术出版社。 裴新宁.(2005). 面向学习者的教学设计. 北京:教育科学出版社. 裴新宁.(2013). 让学习成功——变构模型及其教学应用.教育生物学杂志,(4), 263-270. 唐小为,丁邦平. (2012). "科学探究"缘何变身"科学实践"?——解读美国科学教育框架理念的首位关键词之变.教育研究(11), 141-145. 赵健,李锋,刘亭亭,吴伟.(2017).创建全球科创中心,上海学生的数字化素养够了吗?——基于PISA2012相关测试结果的分析, 开放教育研究,23(5),30-41. 赵健,裴新宁,冯锐,成佳铭,金莺莲.(2013). 我国教师的专业发展实践及其对学生成绩的影响:基于五城市调研的分析. 全球教育展望,42(2),22-33,53. 周仕东, 郑长龙. (2010). 论实现科学本质教育的前提条件.中国教育学刊,(10), 39-41. 周仕东, 孙景霞, 郑长龙. (2006). 连堂课的科学探究教学实践与反思.中国教育学刊, (11), 48-50. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In:Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (Eds.). The Nature of Learning:Using Research to Inspire Practice. OECD Publishing, 199-225. Berliner, D C.(2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200-212. Clarke, S.N. (2015). The right to speak.In:L.B. Resnick, C.S.C. Asterhan,& S.N. Clarke (Eds.) Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association, 167-180. Coquidé, M., & Pei, X. (2014).Comparing Teacher's Understanding and Enactment about Scientific Investigation in France and in China. Presentation on the 5th Seminar on French-Chinese Laboratory for Comparing Curricula in Science Education (C2SE), Oct. 20-22. ENS de Lyon, France. Crawford, B.A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom.In:N. G. Lederman, & S. K.Abell(Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Vol. Ⅱ. New York:Routledge,515-544. Engestr m, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work.Ergonomics,43(7), 960-974. European Commission (2011).Final Report-POLLEN.(2011-04-14)[2017-08-04].Retrieved from:http://cordis.europa.eu/publication/rcn/12661_en.html European Commission(2013).S-TEAM Report Summary.(2013-06-04)[2016-08-06]. Retrieved from:http://www.s-teamproject.eu. European Commission(2015). Science Education for Responsible Citizenship.Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union. Grangeat M. (2013)(Ed.).Les enseignants de sciences face aux démarchesd'investigation:des formations et des pratiques de classe. Grenoble:Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. Greeno, J. G., & Moore, J. L. (1993).Situativity and symbols:response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 49-60. Jacobson, M. J., Taylor, C. E.,& Richards, D. (2016).Computational scientific inquiry with virtual worlds and agent-based models:new ways of doing science to learn science.Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2080-2108. Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry:The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. Leinhardt G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching.Educational Researcher, 19(19), 18-25. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(9), 1318-1347. Martinand, J.-L. (2003). L'éducation technologique à l'école moyenne en France:problèmes de didactique curriculaire. La revue canadienne de l'enseignement des sciences, des mathématiques et des technologies, 3 (1), 100-116. Moallem M.(1998). An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles:An ethnographic study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(2),37-64. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science Literacy:Conceptes, Context, and Consequeces. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press. National Acadmies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Seeing Students Learning Science:Integrating Assessment and Instruction in the Classroom. Washington, DC:The National Acadmies Press. National Research Council (NRC). (1997). Introducing the National Science Standards. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education:Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press. OECD. (2013). The PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework.(2013-03)[2016-09-10]. Retrieved from:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf[July 2016]. Olson, S., &. Loucks, S. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards:A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. Tobin, K.(2012).Sociocultural perspectives on science education. In:B. Fraser, K. Tobin, C. McRobbie (Eds.). Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer, 3-17. |