从民族主义到世界主义：比较教育研究方法论的理路转向

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.09.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着“民族国家”成为西方近现代以来比较教育分析的基本单位，比较教育方法论长期困囿于“方法论民族主义”的泥淖中。“方法论民族主义”假设民族国家是近现代社会与政治组织的自然发展形式，将民族国家视为唯一的分析单位或社会进程的“容器”。在研究过程中，“方法论民族主义”用民族国家的经历来解释现代化历程，忽略其他民族国家的情境，从而将研究局限于特定民族国家的地缘政治边界，将民族国家共同体视为最终分析单位，并以此界定社会科学中的多重分析现象和问题。随着全球化的纵深发展与全球风险社会的来临，世界主义已然成为全球教育发展的重要思潮，并具有重要的教育价值意蕴。方法论世界主义关照整个世界及其全球化的多重图景，重构“民族国家”社会学体系中所形成的各种二元对立的概念体系，扩展比较教育的分析单位与研究范式，从而超越“方法论民族主义”的局限性。在人文社会科学“世界主义”转向的背景下，实现从“民族主义”到“世界主义”的转向，是走出当前比较教育方法论发展困境的可行路径。

关键词: 比较教育方法论, 民族国家, 民族主义, 世界主义

Abstract:

With the “nation state” becoming the basic unit of comparative education analysis since the beginning of Western modern times, the methodology of comparative education has long been trapped in the quagmire of “methodological nationalism”. Methodological nationalism assumes that a nation state is a natural development form of modern society and political organizations, viewing it as the only analytical unit or “container” of social processes. In the research process, “methodological nationalism” uses the experience of nation states to explain the modernization process, ignoring the context of other nation states, and thus limiting the research to the geopolitical boundaries of specific nation states, viewing the nation state as the ultimate unit of analysis, and defining multiple analytical phenomena and problems in social sciences. With the deepening development of globalization and the arrival of a global risk society, cosmopolitanism has become an important trend in global education development and has important educational value implications. Methodological cosmopolitanism takes into account the multiple perspectives of the entire world and its globalization, reconstructs the various binary opposing conceptual systems formed in the sociological system of “nation states”, expands the analytical units and research paradigms of comparative education, and transcends the limitations of “methodological nationalism”. In the context of the transition from “nationalism” to “cosmopolitanism” in humanities and social sciences, it is a feasible path to overcome the current development dilemma of comparative education methodology.

Key words: comparative education methodology, nation-state, nationalism, cosmopolitanism

祝刚, 孔令帅, 杨启光, 吴天一. 从民族主义到世界主义：比较教育研究方法论的理路转向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(9): 89-102.

Gang Zhu, Lingshuai Kong, Qiguang Yang, Tianyi Wu. From Nationalism to Cosmopolitanism: A Shift in The Methodology of Comparative Education Research[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(9): 89-102.

参考文献 89

1	阿帕杜莱. (2012). 消散的现代性: 全球化的文化维度 (刘冉译). 上海: 上海三联书店.
2	鲍曼. (2018). 流动的现代性(欧阳景根译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
3	贝克, 邓正来, 沈国麟.. (2010). 风险社会与中国——与德国社会学家乌尔里希•贝克的对话. 社会学研究, 25 (05), 208- 231+246.
4	贝克.. (2008). 什么是世界主义?(章国锋译). 马克思主义与现实, (02), 54- 57.
5	蔡拓, 张冰冰.. (2022). 从国家主义走向世界主义——自由主义国际秩序的辨析与反思. 探索与争鸣, (07), 31- 46+177.
6	蔡拓.. (2017). 世界主义的理路与谱系. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), (06), 144- 156.
7	蔡拓.. (2018b). 世界主义与人类命运共同体的比较分析. 国际政治研究, 39 (06), 9- 24.
8	蔡拓.. (2018a). 世界主义的类型分析. 国际观察, (01), 18- 39.
9	杜威. (1997). 新旧个人主义(孙有中译). 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
10	杜威. (2001). 民主主义与教育(王承绪译). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
11	杜威. (2015). 公众及其问题(本书编写组译). 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
12	顾明远.. (2005). 关于比较教育学科建设的几个问题. 比较教育研究, (03), 1- 4.
13	侯佳, 侯怀银.. (2022). 论比较教育学学术体系的多维存在性. 比较教育研究, 44 (09), 3- 11.
14	蒋竹山. (2022). 旅行者的世界史. 台北: 时报出版社.
15	李望根. (2017). 超越国家主义与世界主义: 对国际分配正义理论的批判性考察.上海:华东师范大学博士学位论文.
16	李永晶.. (2016). 新世界主义: 破解民族精神的时代困境. 探索与争鸣, (02), 64- 68.
17	刘宝存, 高益民.. (2021). 全球化时代比较教育学科的转型. 比较教育研究, 43 (09), 29- 38.
18	刘擎.. (2015). 重建全球想象: 从“天下”理想走向新世界主义. 学术月刊, 47 (08), 5- 15.
19	马克思, 恩格斯. (2012). 马克思恩格斯选集: 第1卷. 北京: 人民出版社.
20	王巨光.. (2008). 国家的教育与社会的教育——简论杜威世界主义的民主教育思想及其影响. 贺州学院学报, 24 (04), 98- 100.
21	王宁.. (2014). 西方文论关键词世界主义. 外国文学, (01), 96- 105+159.
22	王长纯.. (2005). 文化自觉、理论自觉和实践自觉(论纲)——比较教育和而不同发展的途径. 比较教育研究, (03), 18- 26.
23	王之延.. (2021). 新语境下跨文化传播研究范式转移. 国际传播, (05), 24- 33.
24	韦伯. (1999). 社会科学方法论(李秋零、田薇译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
25	项贤明.. (2001a). 比较教育学的学科同一性危机及其超越. 比较教育研究, (03), 30- 36.
26	项贤明.. (2001b). 教育: 全球化、本土化与本土生长——从比较教育学的角度观照. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), (02), 32- 41.
27	项贤明.. (2002). 比较教育: 话语与权力. 高等教育研究, (02), 95- 99+110.
28	项贤明.. (2005). 站在十字路口的中国比较教育学. 比较教育研究, (03), 27- 32.
29	薛理银. (2009). 当代比较教育方法论研究. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
30	叶澜. (1999). 教育研究方法论初探. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
31	俞凌云, 林杰.. (2022). “理想类型”与比较教育研究方法论. 比较教育研究, 44 (01), 59- 68.
32	章国锋.. (2006). 反思的现代化与风险社会——乌尔里希•贝克对西方现代化理论的研究. 马克思主义与现实, (01), 130- 135.
33	章国锋.. (2008). “全球风险社会”: 困境与出路——贝克的“世界主义”构想. 马克思主义与现实, (02), 45- 53.
34	朱旭东.. (2001). 康德尔的比较教育研究范式——民族主义的国家与教育发展理论. 比较教育研究, (09), 9- 15.
35	朱旭东.. (2007). 民族国家教育知识和比较教育研究——比较教育学科体系再思考. 比较教育研究, (03), 22- 28.
36	朱旭东.. (2008). 试论民族—国家教育体系的比较研究. 外国教育研究, (08), 1- 6+34.
37	祝刚, 史可媛.. (2023). 全球化时代处于十字路口的比较教育学——卡洛斯•托雷斯比较教育思想探赜. 外国教育研究, 50 (05), 3- 20.
38	祝刚, 王语婷.. (2022). 论比较教育学的后殖民主义转向及其价值意蕴. 比较教育研究, 44 (05), 13- 24+55.
39	Adami, R.. (2014). Toward cosmopolitan ethics in teacher education: An ontological dimension of learning human rights. Ethics and Education, 9 (1), 29- 38.
40	Altbach, P. G.. (1991). Trends in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 35 (3), 491- 507.
41	Amelina, A. (Ed. ) (2012). Beyond methodological nationalism: Research methodologies for cross-border studies. London, UK: Routledge.
42	Arnove, R. F.. (1980). Comparative education and world-systems analysis. Comparative Education Review, 24 (1), 48- 62.
43	Arnove, R. F. (2009). World-systems analysis and comparative education in the age of globalization. In Cowen, R., & Kazamias, A. M. (Eds. ). International handbook of comparative education (pp. 101-119). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
44	Beck, U. (2007). The cosmopolitan condition: Why methodological nationalism fails. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7-8), 286—290.
45	Beck, U. (2011). Multiculturalism or cosmopolitanism: How can we describe and understand the diversity of the world? Social Sciences in China, 32(4), 52—58.
46	Beck, U., & Sznaider, N (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1-23.
47	Byker, E. J., & Putman, S. M.. (2019). Catalyzing cultural and global competencies: Engaging preservice teachers in study abroad to expand the agency of citizenship. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23 (1), 84- 105.
48	Chernilo, D.. (2006). Social theory’s methodological nationalism: Myth and reality. European Journal of Social Theory, 9 (1), 5- 22.
49	Chernilo, D. (2006). Methodological nationalism and its critique. In G. Delanty and K. Kumar (Eds). The SAGE handbook of nations and nationalism (pp. 129-140). London, UK: SAGE.
50	Chernilo, D. (2008). A social theory of the nation-state: The political forms of modernity beyond methodological nationalism. London, UK: Routledge.
51	Chernilo, D.. (2011). The critique of methodological nationalism: Theory and history. Thesis Eleven, 106 (1), 98- 117.
52	Dale, R. (2000). Globalization, a new world for comparative education? In Jürgen Schriewer (Ed). Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 87-109). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
53	Dale, R.. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education, 41 (2), 117- 149.
54	Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (2009). Beyond methodological “isms” in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds. ) International Handbook of Comparative Education (pp.1113-1127). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
55	Epstein, E. H.. (2008). Setting the normative boundaries: Crucial epistemological benchmarks in comparative education. Comparative Education, 44 (4), 373- 386.
56	Giraudy, A., & Niedzwiecki, S.. (2022). Multi-level governance and subnational research: Similarities, differences, and knowledge accumulation in the study of territorial politics. Regional & Federal Studies, 32 (3), 393- 411.
57	Green, A.. (2003). Education, globalisation and the role of comparative research. London Review of Education, 1 (2), 84- 97.
58	Guevara, J.. (2002). Comparative studies of early childhood education and care: beyond methodological nationalism. Comparative Education, 58 (3), 328- 344.
59	Hansen, D. T. (2008a). Education viewed through a cosmopolitan prism. Philosophy of Education, 206—214. DOI:10.47925/2008.206.
60	Hansen, D. T.. (2008b). Curriculum and the idea of a cosmopolitan inheritance. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40 (3), 289- 312.
61	Hansen, D. T., Burdick-Shepherd, S., Cammarano, C., & Obelleiro, G.. (2009). Education, values, and valuing in cosmopolitan perspective. Curriculum Inquiry, 39 (5), 587- 612.
62	Holmes, B. (1981). Comparative education: Some considerations of method. London, UK: Routledge.
63	Jeffery, C., & Schakel, A. H.. (2013). Insights: Methods and data beyond methodological nationalism. Regional Studies, 47 (3), 402- 404.
64	Jules, T. D., Shields, R., & Thomas, M. A. (Eds. ). (2021). The Bloomsbury handbook of theory in comparative and international education. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
65	Kazamias, A. M.. (1962). History, science and comparative education: A study in methodology. International Review of Education, 8, 383- 398.
66	Koos, A. K., & Keulman, K.. (2019). Methodological nationalism in global studies and beyond. Social Sciences, 8 (12), 327. doi: 10.3390/socsci8120327
67	Kuhn, T. S. (1997). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68	Martin, D., McCann, E., & Purcell, M.. (2003). Space, scale, governance, and representation: Contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25 (2), 113- 121.
69	Mongia, R. (2012). Interrogating Critiques of Methodological Nationalism: Propositions for New Methodologies. In Amelina, A., Nergiz, D. D., Faist, T., & Schiller, N. G. (Eds. ). Beyond methodological nationalism: Research methodologies for cross-border studies (pp. 198-218). London: UK. Routledge.
70	Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T.. (2003). Comparative research in education: a mode of governance or a historical journey?. Comparative Education, 39 (4), 423- 438.
71	Nusssbaum, M. (1996). Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. In M. Nussbaum & J. Cohen (Eds. ), For the love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism (pp. 2–17). Cambridge MA: Beacon Press.
72	Paulston, R. G.. (1999). Mapping comparative education after postmodernity. Comparative Education Review, 43 (4), 438- 463.
73	Phillips, D.. (2006). Comparative education: method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1 (4), 304- 319.
74	Popkewitz, T. S. (2009). The double gestures of cosmopolitanism and comparative studies of education. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds. ). International handbook of comparative education (pp. 385-401). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
75	Reid, C., & Sriprakash, A.. (2012). The possibility of cosmopolitan learning: Reflecting on future directions for diversity teacher education in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (1), 15- 29.
76	Rizvi, F.. (2008). Epistemic virtues and cosmopolitan learning. Australian Educational Researcher, 35 (1), 17- 35.
77	Rizvi, F.. (2009). Towards cosmopolitan learning. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 30 (3), 253- 268.
78	Rizvi, F.. (2019). Global interconnectivity and its ethical challenges in education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 315- 326.
79	Rizvi, F., & Beech, J. ( 2017). Global mobilities and the possibilities of a cosmopolitan curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(1), 125—134.
80	Rönnström, N.. (2013). From globalist to cosmopolitan learning: on the reflexive modernization of teacher education. Ethics & Global Politics, 5 (4), 193- 216.
81	Schneider, B. (2019) Methodological nationalism in linguistics. Language Sciences, 76, 101—169.
82	Shahjahan, R. A., & Kezar, A. J.. (2013). Beyond the “national container” addressing methodological nationalism in higher education research. Educational Researcher, 42 (1), 20- 29.
83	Snyder, R.. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 93- 110.
84	Tarc, P., & Budrow, J. (2022) Seeking the cosmopolitan teacher: Internationalising curricula in a Canadian preservice teacher education program. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 1—18.
85	UNESCO (2015). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good? Paris, France: Educational and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.
86	UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: Educational and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.
87	Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301—334.
88	Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G (2003) Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review, 37(3), 576—610.
89	Zhu, G, Xu, G, Li, Y., Chen, B. (2020) Typology of OECD’s global educational governance and its policy effect. Comparative Education Review, 64(3), 525—542.