华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 24-35.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.03.003

• 改革与发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨越“死亡之谷”：构建高质量大学专利评价体系

王甦平1,3(), 王未1, 王庆稳2, 张薇薇1, 李冬凉4   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学医学院学科规划处，上海 200025
    2. 上海交通大学医学院图书馆，上海 200025
    3. 上海交通大学中国医院发展研究院医学教育研究所，上海 200025
    4. 转化医学国家科 学中心（上海），上海 200240
  • 出版日期:2025-03-01 发布日期:2025-02-24
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划重点专项“健康管理综合服务应用示范”项目（2020YFC2006400）；2024年度上海市人民政府教育督导委员会办公室委托课题“高校创新成果专项评价” ；上海市卫生健康委员会卫生健康政策研究课题“上海医学科技成果转化现状、问题与促进策略”（2024HP24）；中央高校基本科研业务费上海交通大学科技发展研究基金资助项目“上海交通大学医工交叉发展成效与趋势研究”（24X010300923）。

Crossing the “Valley of Death”: Establishing a High-quality Patent Evaluation System for Universities

Suping Wang1,3(), Wei Wang1, Qingwen Wang2, Weiwei Zhang1, Dongliang Li4   

  1. 1. Office of Academic Planning and Development of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
    2. Library of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 China
    3. China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 China
    4. National Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), Shanghai 200240, China
  • Online:2025-03-01 Published:2025-02-24

RichHTML

8

PDF

49

摘要：

当前我国正进入专利高质量发展的战略转型期，高校在以科技创新服务国家经济社会高质量发展中起着重要作用。目前高校中仍有大量专利“沉睡”在象牙塔里，折戟在专利授权和专利转移转化之间的 “死亡之谷”。制定一套科学有效的高校专利评价指标和构建一套高质量专利评价体系是当务之急。本文采用德尔菲法与层次分析法相结合的混合研究方法确定指标权重，构建了包含4个一级指标、15个二级指标的高质量专利评价体系。其中4个一级指标权重由高到低分别为专利转化（0.2674）、专利管理（0.2582）、专利创造（0.2435）和专利维持（0.2309）。该评价体系具有较好的科学性和适用性，可以较为全面、综合地反映高校专利现状，为高校开展科技成果评估工作奠定基础。

关键词: 高校专利, 高质量专利, 专利转化, 专利评价

Abstract:

Currently, China is entering a strategic transformation period of high-quality patent development. Higher education institutions play a crucial role in serving the country’s economic and social high-quality development through scientific and technological innovation. A large number of patents in universities are still “dormant” in the ivory tower, falling into the “valley of death” between patent authorization and patent transfer and transformation. How to develop a set of patent evaluation indicators and systems suitable for universities to promote the effective transformation of high-quality patents in universities has become an important path to improve the efficiency of patent quality management in universities. This study used a mixed research method combining literature review, Delphi method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine indicator weights. The results indicate that in the high-quality patent evaluation system constructed, which includes 4 primary indicators and 15 secondary indicators, the weights of the primary indicators from high to low are patent conversion (0.2674), patent management (0.2582), patent creation (0.2435), and patent maintenance (0.2309), respectively. This evaluation system has good scientificity and applicability, and can comprehensively reflect the current level of patents in universities. From the perspective of the full cycle of patents, it should have both “quantitative” and “qualitative” indicators to build a distinctive patent evaluation system adapted to the patents of colleges and universities, so as to help promote the high-quality transformation of patents.

Key words: university patents, high quality patents, patent conversion, patent evaluation