华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 13-28.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.07.002

• 专题:高校创新创业教育(特约主持:黄兆信) • 上一篇    下一篇

教育科技人才一体化的高校创新之道——基于创新投入扩散与创新产出的面板模型

黄兆信1, 龙泽海1,2, 韩冠爽1   

  1. 1. 杭州师范大学中国创新创业教育研究院,杭州 311121
    2. 浙江大学教育学院,杭州 310058
  • 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-06-28
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“新形势下全面提高人才自主培养质量研究”(23JZD045)。

Exploring University Innovation Approach of Integrating Education, Science and Technology, and Human Resources :Based on a Panel Model of Innovation Input Diffusion and Innovation Output

Zhaoxin Huang1, Zehai Long1,2, Guanshuang Han1   

  1. 1. Institute of China Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
    2. College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-06-28

摘要:

党的二十大报告提出教育科技人才一体化,创新在其中发挥关键作用。高校是其中实施的核心环节,占据重要地位。本文以高校创新生态系统、投入产出为理论基础,从创新投入扩散与创新产出探讨高校创新之道。本文通过31个省市自治区相关指标的数据,构建面板模型,研究高校创新体系以及投入扩散与产出的关系。研究发现:构建高校创新生态系统是教育科技人才一体化高校创新体系建设的迫切要求;创新人力投入是高校创新产出的根本源泉;创新经费投入构成高校创新产出的核心保障;技术转让对于高校创新产出具有重要激励作用;国际合作研究为高校创新产出提供重要推动力,但国际会议交流还未发挥其应有作用。基于此提出相关对策建议。

关键词: 教育科技人才一体化, 高校创新, 创新投入, 创新扩散, 创新产出

Abstract:

The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed the integration of education, science and technology, and human resources, emphasizing the pivotal role of innovation within this framework. Universities, as crucial drivers of strategic implementation, occupy a central position. This paper, grounded in the theoretical underpinnings of the university innovation ecosystem, input-output dynamics, delves into the trajectory of university innovation through examination of innovation input, diffusion, and output. Based on the data of relevant indicators in 31 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions, a panel model is constructed to study the university innovation system and the relationship between input, diffusion and output. The research finds that constructing a university innovation ecosystem is an urgent requirement for building an integrated university innovation system that combines education, science and technology, and human resources. Also, innovation manpower input investment serves as the cornerstone of university innovation output; innovation funding constitutes a critical safeguard for university innovation output; technology transfer plays a pivotal role in incentivizing university innovation output; and international cooperative research provides an important driving force for the innovation output of universities, but the international conference exchange has not played its due role. Based on these findings, strategic recommendations are proposed.

Key words: the integration of education, science and technology, and human resources, university innovation, innovation input, innovation diffusion, innovation output