华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 103-116.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.06.007

• 教师队伍建设 • 上一篇    

朝向教育家精神的教师信念体系理论模型建构

季春梅   

  1. 南京大学教育研究院/陶行知教师教育学院,南京 210023
  • 接受日期:2026-03-24 出版日期:2026-06-01 发布日期:2026-05-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“‘国优计划’学生教育信念的动态变化、品质评估及涵养路径研究”(BRA240222)。

The Theoretical Model Construction of the Teachers’ Belief System Toward Educators Spirit

Chunmei Ji   

  1. Institute of Education & Tao Xingzhi School of Teacher Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Accepted:2026-03-24 Online:2026-06-01 Published:2026-05-27

摘要:

在教育强国建设与中国式教育现代化推进的关键阶段,弘扬教育家精神已成为教师队伍建设的核心议题。教育家精神从价值倡导转化为实践常态,关键在于以教师信念体系为内生根基。作为教育家精神生发、涵养与实践转化的核心载体,教师信念体系当前面临文化传承、权利配置与制度支持三重现实瓶颈,制约着教育高质量发展与教育家精神培育。围绕“朝向教育家精神”的过程性建构,本文以“价值—理论—实践”为分析框架,整合哲学诠释学、交往行为理论与社会系统论,构建教师信念体系“效能—结构”整合模型。该模型以“历史—规范—进化”为三维理论根基,包含文化生成、政策转化、生态进化三大效能体系,以及意义基底、动力轴心、行动响应、调节反馈四层双环结构,形成“结构支撑效能、效能反哺结构”的动态循环。模型旨在靶向破解三重现实瓶颈,明确教师信念体系“意义转译枢纽”的核心功能,揭示教育家精神与教师信念体系“价值引领—实践载体”的辩证关系,突破传统信念研究的静态化、个体化局限,为教育家精神的培育与立德树人根本任务的落实提供内在理论支撑与实践运行机制。

关键词: 教师信念体系, 教育家精神, 理论模型, 教育高质量发展, 意义转译

Abstract:

In the critical phase of building a powerful education nation and advancing Chinese-style education modernization, promoting the spirit of educators has become a core issue in teacher team development. The key to transforming this spirit from a value-driven advocacy into a practical norm lies in taking the teachers’ belief system as the inherent foundation. As the core carrier for the emergence, cultivation, and practical transformation of the educators spirit, the teachers’ belief system currently faces three major practical bottlenecks: cultural inheritance, rights allocation, and institutional support, which restrict the realization of high-quality education development and the cultivation of the educators spirit. Centering on the construction logic and practical path of the teachers’ belief system oriented towards the spirit of educators, and adopting the “value-theory-practice” analytical framework, this study integrates philosophical hermeneutics, communicative action theory, and social systems theory to construct an “efficiency-structure” integrated model. The model takes “history-norm-evolution” as its three-dimensional theoretical foundation, comprising three major efficiency systems—cultural generation, policy transformation, and ecological evolution and a four-tiered double-loop structure—meaning base, dynamic axis, action response, and regulatory feedback, forming a dynamic cycle of “structure supporting efficiency and efficiency feeding back structure”. Targeting the three practical bottlenecks, the model clarifies the core function of the teachers’ belief system as a “meaning translation hub”, reveals the dialectical relationship of “value guidance-practical carrier” between the educators spirit and the teachers’ belief system, and breaks through the static and individual limitations of traditional belief research. It provides inherent theoretical support and practical operation mechanisms for the cultivation of the educators spirit and the implementation of the fundamental task of fostering virtue through education.

Key words: teachers’ belief system, educators spirit, theoretical model, high-quality development of education, meaning transduction