科研诚信与学术声誉——基于政治哲学与博弈论的思考

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.006

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 75-86.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.006

科研诚信与学术声誉——基于政治哲学与博弈论的思考

吴冠军

华东师范大学政治学系暨中国现代思想文化研究所，上海 200241

发布日期:2020-07-14
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目“后现代主义哲学发展路径与新进展研究”（18ZDA017）；中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学人文社会科学青年跨学科创新团队项目（2018ECNU-QKT012）

Research Integrity and Academic Reputation: Reflections Based on Political Philosophy and Game Theory

Wu Guanjun

Department of Politics/Institute of Modern Chinese Thought and Culture, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241

Published:2020-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 因2019年年初的翟天临事件，科研诚信问题成为一个全民关注的社会热点。2017年《肿瘤生物学》集体撤稿事件，则使得中国科研人员的诚信问题被国际学术共同体所关注。本文从政治哲学与博弈论角度出发，来对科研诚信做出一个系统性与原创性的学理分析。恪守科研诚信、维护学术声誉，不仅仅是自利性-策略性地捍卫学者个体，同时是政治性-团结性地捍卫学术共同体。

关键词: 科研诚信, 原初信任, 声誉-响应性, 政治智慧, 博弈论

Abstract: The issue of research integrity has become a socially heated topic since the Zhai Tianlin incident in early 2019. The same issue among Chinese researchers has attracted the attention of international academic community since the Han Chunyu incident in 2017. Instead of taking the ethical angle, this paper tackles the issue of research integrity by incorporating the analytical skills from political philosophy and the game theory. Maintaining research integrity and protecting academic reputation does not just egotistically and strategically protects the researchers themselves, but at the same while politically and socially protect the academic community.

Key words: research integrity, original trust, reputation-responsiveness, political wisdom, game theory

吴冠军. 科研诚信与学术声誉——基于政治哲学与博弈论的思考[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 75-86.

Wu Guanjun. Research Integrity and Academic Reputation: Reflections Based on Political Philosophy and Game Theory[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 75-86.

参考文献

陈晓雪等. (2017). 河北科大副教授的科研成果何以优于麻省理工哈佛. 新浪新闻. http://news.sina.com.cn/zl/2016-05-09/doc-ifxryhhi8521168.shtml.
陈宇. (2019). 美俄《中导条约》冻结, 核军控路在何方. 新浪新闻. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2019-07-04/doc-ihytcitk9774788.shtml.
何利权等. (2018). 教授梁莹回应被指学术不端: 犯过错但后来很努力, 已提出辞职. 澎湃新闻. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2568640.
贺德. (2017). 《肿瘤生物学》107篇论文撤稿事件涉521人; 官方: 对376人明确处理意见. 搜狐网. http://www.sohu.com/a/160611374_377321.
华义. (2019). 日本大阪大学宣布已故副教授多篇论文造假. 东方网. http://news.eastday.com/s/20190316/u1ai12337025.html.
敬一山. (2018). 在重论文的游戏规则下, 梁莹“脱颖而出”具有必然性. 澎湃新闻. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2564359.
刘慈欣. (2008). 三体II·黑暗森林. 重庆: 重庆出版社.
刘潇潇. (2019). 知名餐饮“外婆家”遭曝光: 厨师脚踩案板, 食材疑似过期. 中国经济网. http://www.ce.cn/cysc/sp/info/201903/15/t20190315_31689144.shtml.
拾遗. (2019). 你嫌性教育太早, 坏人可不嫌你孩子太小. 搜狐网. http://www.sohu.com/a/325255935_752476.
王嘉兴. (2018). 青年长江学者梁莹教授与她“404”的论文. 澎湃新闻. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2559588.
王盈颖等. (2017). 韩春雨NgAgo论文被自然子刊撤稿: 系作者主动申请撤回. 澎湃新闻. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1750457.
吴冠军. (2018a). 话语政治与怪物政治——透过大众文化重思政治哲学. 探索与争鸣,3,51-65
吴冠军. (2018b). 政治秩序及其不满: 论拉康对政治哲学的三重贡献. 山东社会科学,10,54-62
吴冠军. (2019a). 速度与智能: 人工智能时代的三重哲学反思. 山东社会科学,6,13-20
吴冠军. (2019b). 后人类状况与中国教育实践: 教育终结抑或终身教育?——人工智能时代的教育哲学思考. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),1,1-15
吴冠军. (2019c). 在黑格尔与巴迪欧之间的“爱”——从张念的黑格尔批判说起. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1,92-99
新华社. (2018). 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见》. 央广网. http://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1601892715541005362.
叶雨婷等. (2017). 多国科学家质疑韩春雨论文, 《自然》要其公开数据. 环球网. http://world.huanqiu.com/hot/2016-08/9264418.html.
钟煜豪. (2019). 翟天临事件全纪录. 澎湃新闻. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2996570.
Aristotle. (1995). Politics. trans. Ernest Barker, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (2003). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-76. ed. Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana, trans. David Macey. New York: Picador.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Jaspers, K. (1953). The Origin and Goal of History. trans. Michael Bullock. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1976). Journals and Papers. trans. Howard and Edna Hong. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. ed. Tom Burns and Gianfranco Poggi, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
McAdams, D. (2014). Game-Changer: Game Theory and the Art of Transforming Strategic Situations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
McGeer, V. & Pettit, P. (2017). “The Empowering Theory of Trust”. in Paul Faulkner and Thomas Simpson (ed.). The Philosophy of Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2002). “The Cunning of Trust”. in his Rules, Reasons, and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schelling, T. C. (1980). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Simmel, G. (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. ed. Donald N. Levine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Simmel, G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money. ed. David Frisby, trans. Tom Bottomore, David Frisby, and Kaethe Mengelberg, third enlarged edition. London: Routledge.
Zhong, R. (2019). “‘Prospective Threat’ of Chinese Spying Justifies Huawei Ban, U.S. Says”. New York Times. July 5, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/05/technology/huawei-lawsuit-us-government.html

科研诚信与学术声誉——基于政治哲学与博弈论的思考

Research Integrity and Academic Reputation: Reflections Based on Political Philosophy and Game Theory

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价