华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 74-85.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.11.007

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生应对高校个人信息收集的抵抗行为及其影响因素:基于fsQCA的组态分析

黄文杰, 邵卓人   

  1. 厦门大学法学院,福建厦门 361000
  • 接受日期:2025-07-27 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“中国式现代化进程中加强新兴领域立法研究”(23ZDA076)。

Understanding Students’ Resistance to Personal Information Collection in Universities: An Analysis by fsQCA Methods

Wenjie Huang, Zhuoren Shao   

  1. School of Law, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China
  • Accepted:2025-07-27 Online:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-03

摘要:

随着数字技术的广泛应用,个人信息收集行为在提高管理效率的同时也引发了隐私保护问题,导致信息主体可能产生抵抗行为。本研究聚焦校园管理场域,深入分析大学生对高校信息收集的抵抗行为及其影响因素,旨在为完善个人信息保护制度和优化高校信息治理提供理论依据。研究通过问卷调查和深度访谈收集数据,运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,系统分析大学生信息收集抵抗行为的影响因素与组合路径。大学生对高校信息收集的抵抗行为是多维度信息意识交互作用的结果,其中呈现出三条较为重要的组合路径:“技术排斥型”路径显示,信息技术接受度是影响学生抵抗行为的重要因素,信息权益认知高、技术接受度低的个体更容易产生抵抗;“信任缺失型”路径发现,信息保护知识的缺乏与对学校信任度的降低会共同强化大学生的抵抗意愿;“知识悖反型”路径说明,即使学生具有较高的信息技术素养和技术接受程度,但信息管理意识和信息安全感知的缺乏仍然可能导致较为显著的抵抗行为。

关键词: 大学生隐私意识, 数字抵抗, 风险感知, 信息自主意识, 高校信息管理

Abstract:

With the widespread application of digital technology, the collection of personal information has not only improved management efficiency but also raised privacy protection issues, leading to potential resistance behavior from information subjects. This study focuses on the field of campus management, deeply analyzes college students’ resistance behavior towards university information collection and its influencing factors, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for improving personal information protection systems and optimizing university information governance. This study collects data through questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews, and uses fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to systematically analyze the influencing factors and combination paths of college students’ information collection resistance behavior. The study finds that college students’ resistance behavior towards university information collection is the result of the interaction of multi-dimensional information awareness, among which three relatively important combination paths are presented: The “technology rejection” path shows that the acceptance of information technology is an important factor affecting students’ resistance behavior, with individuals who have a high awareness of information rights and low acceptance of technology being more likely to resist; The “trust deficiency” path finds that the lack of knowledge about information protection and the reduction of trust in the university will jointly strengthen college students’ willingness to resist; The “knowledge paradox” path explains that even if students have a high level of information technology literacy and technology acceptance, the lack of information management awareness and information security perception can still lead to significant resistance behavior.

Key words: privacy awareness, digital resistance, risk perception, information autonomy, information management in higher education