学校价值观调查中的社会称许性反应：表现、成因与控制

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.06.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

学校价值观调查中的社会称许性反应是一个长期困扰学校价值观调查和学校价值观教育的基本问题。该问题产生的主要原因是学生对社会价值和文化规范的认识和认知，使其在表面上以一种符合社会期望的方式自我呈现，但实际行为与内在认知并不一致。就其表现形式而言，社会称许性反应与符合社会规范的价值观呈正相关，但其中的相关关系仍需进一步研究以确认学生是出于真实的价值偏好还是出于对规范的依从。此外，当涉及争议性、冲突性的伦理道德问题时，学生往往因维护自尊和面子而倾向于做出符合规范的回应，这将严重影响研究信效度。为了有效控制学校价值观调查中的社会称许性反应，可以借鉴现代化的量表编制和统计测量技术，开发体现中国本土文化特色的测量工具。

关键词: 价值观教育, 价值观调查, 社会称许性, 社会称许性量表

Abstract:

The social desirability response in school values surveys is a fundamental issue that has long troubled both the surveys themselves and values education in schools. The generation of this social desirability response is primarily due to students’ understanding and cognition of social values and cultural norms, which lead them to present themselves in a way that conforms to societal expectations on the surface, but their actual behavior is inconsistent with their internal identity. In terms of its manifestation, the social desirability response is positively correlated with values that conform to societal norms, but further research is needed to confirm whether students’ responses are based on genuine values preferences or simply compliance with norms. Furthermore, when it comes to controversial and conflicting ethical and moral issues, students tend to make responses that align with norms in order to maintain their self-esteem and reputation, which seriously affects the validity and reliability of research. In order to effectively control social desirability response in school values surveys, we can draw on modern scale development and statistical measurement techniques, and develop measurement tools that reflect the unique cultural characteristics of China.

Key words: values education, values survey, social desirability, social desirability scale

盛小敏, 石中英. 学校价值观调查中的社会称许性反应：表现、成因与控制[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(6): 51-60.

Xiaomin Sheng, Zhongying Shi. Social Desirability Response in School Values Surveys: Causes, Manifestations, and Control[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(6): 51-60.

图/表 1

参考文献 0

	韩振华, 任剑峰. 社会调查研究中的社会称许性偏见效应华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版) 2002 03 47 50 韩振华, 任剑峰. (2002). 社会调查研究中的社会称许性偏见效应. 华中科技大学学报(人文社会科学版),(03),47—50.
	刘萃侠. 马洛—克罗恩社会赞许性量表对中国被试适用性之初步验证社会学研究 2001 02 49 57 刘萃侠. (2001). 马洛—克罗恩社会赞许性量表对中国被试适用性之初步验证. 社会学研究,(02),49—57.
	李京梅, 郝阳, 单菁竹. 海洋垃圾治理公众支付意愿评估——基于社会期望效应偏差修正视角资源科学 2023 07 1469 1479 李京梅, 郝阳, 单菁竹. (2023). 海洋垃圾治理公众支付意愿评估——基于社会期望效应偏差修正视角. 资源科学,(07),1469—1479.
	李静, 郭永玉. 大学生物质主义与儒家传统价值观的冲突研究心理科学 2012 01 160 164 李静, 郭永玉. (2012). 大学生物质主义与儒家传统价值观的冲突研究. 心理科学,(01),160—164. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2012.01.027
	潘逸沁, 骆方. 社会称许性反应的测量与控制心理科学进展 2017 10 1664 1674 潘逸沁, 骆方. (2017). 社会称许性反应的测量与控制. 心理科学进展,(10),1664—1674.
	盛小敏, 石中英. 英语学界学校价值观教育评价研究的发展趋势: 一项范围综述外国教育研究 2023 50 06 112 128 盛小敏, 石中英. (2023). 英语学界学校价值观教育评价研究的发展趋势: 一项范围综述. 外国教育研究,50(06),112—128.
	王珊, 骆方, 刘红云. 迫选式人格测验的传统计分与IRT计分模型心理科学进展 2014 22 03 549 557 王珊, 骆方, 刘红云. (2014). 迫选式人格测验的传统计分与IRT计分模型. 心理科学进展,22(03),549—557.
	徐晟等. 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人社会赞许性全国常模的制定心理与行为研究 2014 06 748 755 徐晟等. (2014). 心理健康素质测评系统·中国成年人社会赞许性全国常模的制定. 心理与行为研究,(06),748—755.
	赵丹. (2011). 马洛—克罗恩社会赞许性量表的修订及相关研究. 金华:浙江师范大学硕士学位论文.
	赵志裕, 邹智敏, 林升栋. 文化与社会赞许反应: 社会个人互动的观点心理学报 2010 01 48 55 赵志裕, 邹智敏, 林升栋. (2010). 文化与社会赞许反应: 社会个人互动的观点. 心理学报,(01),48—55.
	Bou Malham, P., & Saucier, G. T. The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity International Journal of Psychology 2016 51 6 474 480 Bou Malham, P., & Saucier, G. T. (2016). The conceptual link between social desirability and cultural normativity. International Journal of Psychology,51(6),474—480.
	Cronbach, L. J. Response sets and test validity Educational and psychological measurement 1946 6 4 475 494 Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and psychological measurement,6(4),475—494. doi: 10.1177/001316444600600405
	Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology Journal of consulting psychology 1960 24 4 349 Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of consulting psychology,24(4),349.
	Danioni, F., & Barni, D. Value priorities, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement: Once again, much substance and a little bit of style The Journal of social psychology 2021 161 2 146 159 Danioni, F., & Barni, D. (2021). Value priorities, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement: Once again, much substance and a little bit of style. The Journal of social psychology,161(2),146—159.
	Diessner, R., et al. Who engages with moral beauty? Journal of Moral Education 2013 42 2 139 163 Diessner, R., et al. (2013). Who engages with moral beauty? Journal of Moral Education, 42(2),139—163.
	Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Academic Medicine, 33(08),610 — 611.
	Edwards, A. L., & Walker, J. N. (1961). A short form of the MMPI: The SD scale. Psychological Reports, 1961.
	Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1976-12049-000.
	Ferrari, J. R., Bottom, T. L., & Matteo, E. Sense of community, inclusion, and religious pluralism: A comparison of two Catholic universities Religious Education 2014 109 2 112 125 Ferrari, J. R., Bottom, T. L., & Matteo, E. (2014). Sense of community, inclusion, and religious pluralism: A comparison of two Catholic universities. Religious Education,109(2),112—125.
	Ferrari, J. R., Bristow, M., & Cowman, S. E. Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perceptions of institutional mission and values College Student Journal 2005 39 1 7 14 Ferrari, J. R., Bristow, M., & Cowman, S. E. (2005). Looking good or being good? The role of social desirability tendencies in student perceptions of institutional mission and values. College Student Journal,39(1),7—14.
	Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. Social‐desirability bias and the validity of self‐reported values Psychology & marketing 2000 17 2 105 120 Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. (2000). Social‐desirability bias and the validity of self‐reported values. Psychology & marketing,17(2),105—120.
	Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models Academy of Management Journal 1983 26 2 321 331 Ganster, D. C., Hennessey, H. W., & Luthans, F. (1983). Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal,26(2),321—331.
	Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. Retrieved from: https://oj8k.gitee.io/knowledge_management/files/readings/sdb_intro.pdf.
	Kelly, E. L., Miles, C. C., & Terman, L. M. Ability to influence one's score on a typical pencil-and-paper test of personality A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic & Allied Studies 1936 4 206 215 Kelly, E. L., Miles, C. C., & Terman, L. M. (1936). Ability to influence one's score on a typical pencil-and-paper test of personality. A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic & Allied Studies,4,206—215.
	Kristiansen, C. M. Social desirability and the Rokeach value survey The Journal of social psychology 1985 125 3 399 400 Kristiansen, C. M. (1985). Social desirability and the Rokeach value survey. The Journal of social psychology,125(3),399—400. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1985.9922905
	Krumpal, I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review Quality and quantity 2013 47 4 2025 2047 Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Quality and quantity,47(4),2025—2047. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
	Lee, J. et al. Testing and extending Schwartz refined value theory using a best–worst scaling approach Assessment 2019 26 2 166 180 Lee, J. et al. (2019). Testing and extending Schwartz refined value theory using a best–worst scaling approach. Assessment, 26(2), 166—180.
	Nederhof, A. J. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review European journal of social psychology 1985 15 3 263 280 Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European journal of social psychology,15(3),263—280. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
	Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic Press.
	Paulhus, D. L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding Journal of personality and social psychology 1984 46 3 598 Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of personality and social psychology,46(3),598.
	Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. The social desirability response bias in ethics research Journal of business ethics 1991 10 805 817 Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of business ethics,10,805—817.
	Reynolds, W. M. Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale Journal of clinical psychology 1982 38 1 119 125 Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of clinical psychology,38(1),119—125. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
	Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., et al. Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style British journal of social psychology 1997 36 1 3 18 Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., et al. (1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British journal of social psychology,36(1),3—18.
	Wiggins, J. S. Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction Journal of Consulting Psychology 1959 23 5 419 Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instruction. Journal of Consulting Psychology,23(5),419.

[1]	彭正梅, 周小勇, 高原, 王清涛, 施芳婷. 天下课程：论未来教育的四重视野[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(12): 13-25.
[2]	郭菲, 赵琳, 连志鑫. 大学生自我报告的学习投入可靠吗——大学生群体的社会称许性反应及对自陈式问卷调查的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(4): 53-61+163.