华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 70-76.

• 教育史 • 上一篇    下一篇

儒家的三种传统及其现代命运

叶飞   

  1. 教育部人文社科重点研究基地南京师范大学道德教育研究所,南京 210097
  • 出版日期:2011-06-20 发布日期:2011-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 叶飞
  • 作者简介:叶飞

The Three Types of Confucianism and Their Modern Fate

YE Fei   

  1. Institute of Moral Education,Nanjing Normal University
  • Online:2011-06-20 Published:2011-07-27
  • Contact: YE Fei
  • About author:YE Fei

摘要: 儒家传统的内部结构具有多维性的特征。在以往的“一元分析框架”下,儒家传统往往被当作一个模糊的整体而遭受全面的否定或全面的肯定。这既违背了历史事实也违背了逻辑规律。因为,儒家传统的内部结构是多维、多层面的,不可能以一概全地加以肯定或否定。我们在此所提出的“三维分析框架”,主张从三个层面来解析儒家传统的内部结构:官方制度层的儒家传统、民间草根层的儒家传统和知识分子层的儒家传统。这三个层面的儒家传统由于其内涵、特性的显著差异,导致了它们在现代性的社会背景下形成了不同的适应力和生命力,因而在现代社会中面临着截然不同的命运。

关键词: 传统, 儒家传统, 三维分析框架

Abstract: the inner structure of confucianism is multidimentional. In former one-dimension analytical framework, confucianism was treated as a unity and was criticized or approved thoroughly. It not only violated historical truth, but also violated logical law. Because, the inner structure of confucianism are multidimentional and multiperspective, so we can’t criticize or approve it thoroughly. The three-dimensional analytical framework we suggested here attempts to analyze confucianism’s inner structure by three dimension: confucianism of authority, confucianism of folk society, and confucianism of intellectuals. These three parts of confucianism are different in contents and characteristic. They have different adaptive capacity and vitality in modern society, and their modern fate are very different.