随机干预实验在全球推动扶贫政策改善的经验

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.08.004

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 110-125.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.08.004

• “教育精准扶贫中随机干预实验的中国经验”专刊 • 上一篇

随机干预实验在全球推动扶贫政策改善的经验

石蓉¹, 史耀疆², Bill Bikales³, Ricardo Morel⁴

1. 联合国开发计划署驻华代表处，北京，100600;
2. 陕西师范大学教育实验经济研究所，西安，710119;
3. 联合国驻华协调员办公室，北京，100600;
4. 贫困创新行动缅甸国别处，仰光

发布日期:2020-08-14
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（项目号：71933003）；高等学校学科创新引智计划（项目号： B16031）

Randomized Controlled Trials and Its Policy Implication on Poverty Relief Globally

Shi Rong¹, Shi Yaojiang², Bill Bikales³, Ricardo Morel⁴

1. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in China, Beijing, 100600;
2. Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710119;
3. United Nations (UN) Resident Coordinator’s Office in China, Beijing, 100600;
4. Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA) in Myanmar, Yangon

Published:2020-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2019年诺贝尔经济学奖的授予为随机干预实验带来了许多关注，本文尝试探讨随机干预实验在全球范围内的政策影响。随机干预实验不仅是学术界的一大理论创新，更逐渐发展成为实证有效的政策工具。应用随机干预实验方法产生政策影响有四个作用机制，分别为：（1）规模化有效的干预和项目；（2）通过不成功案例优化项目,改善资源分配；（3）创造知识类的公共产品；（4）制度化循证决策。对作用机制的梳理，可为以中国为代表的发展中国家开展教育减贫领域的随机干预政策模拟实验提供行之有效的实证经验。

关键词: 随机干预实验, 政策影响, 扶贫

Abstract: With increasing attention drawn to Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) after the announcement of the Nobel Prize winners in Economics Science 2019, this paper attempts to discuss the policy impact of RCTs and highlight its importance not only as an academic methodology but also as a useful policy tool. In this paper, four channels have been identified through which RCTs could help policy maker and development agencies in making their decisions. For each channel, detailed case studies are provided to further illustrate the impact of RCTs. The four channels discussed in the paper are 1) scaling up effective interventions, 2) adjusting programs to better allocate resources, 3) generating public goods and knowledge sharing, 4) institutionalizing evidence-based policy making.

Key words: randomized controlled trials, policy impact, poverty alleviation

石蓉, 史耀疆, Bill Bikales, Ricardo Morel. 随机干预实验在全球推动扶贫政策改善的经验[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(8): 110-125.

Shi Rong, Shi Yaojiang, Bill Bikales, Ricardo Morel. Randomized Controlled Trials and Its Policy Implication on Poverty Relief Globally[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(8): 110-125.

参考文献

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL). (2018). The impact of price on take-up and use of preventive health products. J-PAL Policy Insights. Last modified May 2018. https://doi.org/10.31485/pi.2270.2018.
Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E., & Kremer, M. (2016). The influence of randomized controlled trials on development economics research and on development policy. The State of Economics, The State of the World.
Banerjee, A., Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2015). Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 1?21.
Behrman, J., Sengupta, P., & Todd, P. (2000). The impact of PROGRESA on achievement test scores in the first year. September. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Behrman, J., & Hoddinott, P. (2000). An evaluation of the impact of PROGRESA on pre-school child height. July. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Bouguen, A., Filmer, D., Macours, K., & Naudeau, S. (2013). Impact evaluation of three types of early childhood development interventions in Cambodia. The World Bank.
Clemens, M. A., & Demombynes, G. (2010). When does rigorous impact evaluation make a difference? The case of the Millennium Villages. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 3(3), 1?49.
Coady, D. (2000). The application of social cost-benefit analysis to the evaluation of the human capital impacts of PROGRESA. March. InternationalFood Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Cohen, J., & Dupas, P. (2010). Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized Malaria prevention experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 1?45
Duflo, E. (2017). Richard T. Ely lecture: The economist as plumber. American Economic Review, 107(5), 1?26
Gertler, P. J. (2000). Final report: The impact of PROGRESA on health. November. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Hoddinott, J., Skoufias, E., & Washburn, R. (2000).The impact of PROGRESA on consumption: A final report. September. International Food Policy ResearchInstitute, Washington, D.C.
Honorati, M., Gentilini, U., & Yemtsov, R. G. (2015). The state of social safety nets 2015. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Kremer, M., & Miguel, E. (2007). The illusion of sustainability. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1007?1065
Kremer, M., & Glennerster, R. (2011). Improving health in developing countries. Handbook of health economics, 2, 201?315
Maes, J. P., & Reed, L. R. (2012). State of the microcredit summit campaign report 2012. Microcredit Summit Campaign.
Miguel, E., & Kremer, M. (2004). Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica, 72(1), 159?217
Ordonez-Barba, G., & Silva-Hernandez, A. (2019). Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera: Transformations, reaches and results of a paradigmatic program against poverty. Papeles De Poblacion, 25(99), 77?109
Rowe, N. (2011). Mexico's oportunidades: Conditional cash transfers as the solution to global poverty? Donald A. Henriksen Fellowship in International Political Economy, Keck Center for International and Strategic Studies, 1?20.
Sachs, J. D. (2018). Lessons from the Millennium Villages Project: A personal perspective. The Lancet Global Health, 6(5).
Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
Schultz, T. P. (2000). Final report: The impact of PROGRESA on school enrollments. April. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Skoufias, E., & Parker, R. (2001). Conditional cashtransfers and the impact on child work and schooling: Evidence from the PROGRESA program in Mexico. Economia: Journal of Latin America and the Caribbean EconomicAssociation. Vol. 2, No. 1. 1(pages 45–96).
World Health Organization. (2017). World malaria report 2017.

[1]	中国发展研究基金会“一村一园”计划课题组. 教育精准扶贫：“一村一园”计划乐都十周年效果评估[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 107-126.
[2]	朱永新, 罗晶. 教育助力乡村振兴——世界银行消除“学习贫困”项目及对中国的启示[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 96-103.
[3]	聂景春, 高秋风, 杨洁, 关宏宇, 蔡建华. 随机干预实验中的成本效益分析方法及其在中国农村教育领域中的应用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(8): 68-91.
[4]	史耀疆, 张林秀, 常芳, 刘涵, 唐彬, 高秋风, 关宏宇, 聂景春, 杨洁, 白钰, 李英, 汤蕾, 岳爱, 茹彤. 教育精准扶贫中随机干预实验的中国实践与经验[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(8): 1-67.
[5]	赵锦, 王欢, 关宏宇, 史耀疆, 李怡臻, [美]罗思高(Scott Rozelle). 教育精准扶贫：中国农村学生近视问题研究及防控政策建议[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(3): 117-125.
[6]	赵晨, 陈思, 曹艳, [美]凯瑟琳•斯诺, 卢迈. 教育精准扶贫：“一村一园”计划对农村儿童学业成绩的长效影响研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(2): 114-125.
[7]	蒙泽察, 郝文武, 洪松松, 王中晓. 教育对精准扶贫的重要作用——西北连片特困地区农村经济与教育发展关系的实证分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(12): 109-120.
[8]	马红梅, 雷万鹏. 贫困学生培养成本补偿的理论与方法[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(11): 119-126.
[9]	朱成晨, 闫广芬, 朱德全. 乡村建设与农村教育:职业教育精准扶贫融合模式与乡村振兴战略[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 127-135.
[10]	李芳. 集中连片特困地区义务教育精准扶贫制度模式探究——基于帕森斯的社会行动理论[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(2): 116-126.

随机干预实验在全球推动扶贫政策改善的经验

Randomized Controlled Trials and Its Policy Implication on Poverty Relief Globally

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价