华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 100-113.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.07.008

• 高等教育 • 上一篇    

中国高等教育高质量发展水平的测度研究

黄榕, 丁晓昌   

  1. 江苏省教育科学研究院、江苏省高等教育学会,南京 210024
  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-04
  • 基金资助:
    2020年江苏教育改革发展战略性与政策性研究课题“现代化教育强省建设的战略重点、实施策略与路径研究”

Study on the Measurement of Higher Education High-quality Development Level in China

Rong Huang, Xiaochang Ding   

  1. Jiangsu Institute of Education Sciences, Higher Education Association of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210024, China
  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-04

摘要:

“建设高质量教育体系”是我国“十四五”时期发展的政策导向和重点要求,围绕这一目标,开展省际高等教育发展水平的测度研究,形成高质量发展路径是应有之义。结合当前阶段中国高等教育存在的主要问题与高质量发展的新要求新理念,测度体系以阿玛蒂亚?森的“可行能力理论”为理论框架,将高等教育视为具有独立行为能力的组织和促进地区社会经济发展中的关键要素禀赋,构建出包括要素、能力和功能3个维度的测度量表。量表涵盖高等教育数量规模、质量水平、经费投入、师资投入、基础设施、知识生产、人才培养、入学机会、研发条件、人力资本、创新成就等11个方面,并匹配有我国省级数据支撑的43项指标。基于2019年的截面数据和教育水平测度中较常用的4种方法—因子分析、偏最小二乘结构方程模型、优劣解距离法和灰色关联法,得出31个省市区高等教育在要素、能力和功能的分项得分及相应排名;依照聚类分析和综合水平排名,31个省市区高等教育发展水平依次被划分为卓越型、中等型和起步型3大梯队,为地区高等教育与社会经济的高质量协同发展提供了依据。

关键词: 省际高等教育, 可行能力理论, 教育水平评价, 高质量发展

Abstract:

In the fourteenth Five Year Plan period of China, building a high-quality education system is one policy guidance and key requirement. As a result, research on the measurement of provincial higher education development level and high-quality development paths is necessary. This paper takes Amartya Sen’s feasible ability theory as the theoretical framework, regards higher education as an organization with independent behavior ability and the key factor endowment in promoting regional social and economic development, and constructs a measurement system of higher education high-quality development. The system is based on three-dimensional framework from factors to capabilities and functions, covering 11 aspects which are quantity and scale, quality level, financial investment, teacher Investment, infrastructure, knowledge production, personnel training, enrollment opportunities, research and development conditions, human capital and innovation achievements and involving 43 indicators at provincial level. Based on the interface data of China’s 31 provinces in 2019, this paper uses four different measurement methods: factor analysis, partial least squares, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution and grey relation analysis. According to the sub scores of provincial higher education in terms of factors, capabilities and functions through cluster analysis and comprehensive level ranking, 31 provinces are divided into three types of higher education: outstanding type, medium type and starting type, which provides the basis for the comprehensive collaborative improvement of provincial higher education and regional development.

Key words: provincial higher education, the feasible ability theory, the evaluation of education level, high-quality development