教育法治:“双减”政策研究

“双减”政策对学生家庭校外培训参与和支出的影响

  • 庞小冬 ,
  • 薛海平 ,
  • 肖凤秋
展开
  • 1. 首都师范大学教育学院,北京 100048
    2. 首都师范大学中小学生校外教育研究院,北京 100048
    3. 中国儿童中心科研部,北京 100035

录用日期: 2024-08-20

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-24

基金资助

国家社会科学基金教育学重点项目“‘双减’政策落实的过程监测和成效评价研究”(AHA220020)。

版权

华东师范大学学报期刊社, 2025, 版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。

The Impact of the “Double Reduction” Policy on the Participation and Expenditure of Students’ Families on Off-campus Tutoring

  • Xiaodong Pang ,
  • Haiping Xue ,
  • Fengqiu Xiao
Expand
  • 1. College of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
    2. Research Institute of Out-of-school Education for Primary and Secondary School Students, Capital Normal University, Beijing 10048, China
    3. China National Children’s Center, Beijing 100035, China

Accepted date: 2024-08-20

  Online published: 2024-12-24

Copyright

, 2025, Copyright reserved © 2025.

摘要

“双减”政策提出“减轻义务教育阶段学生家庭校外培训支出负担”的目标,而当前对该政策工作目标的达成程度的评估研究相对缺乏。本研究利用基于全国抽样的义务教育阶段学生家庭大样本调查数据,应用双重差分模型(DID),分析“双减”政策对学生家庭校外培训参与和支出的影响。研究发现:(1)“双减”政策对学生家庭“学科类”校外培训参与和支出存在显著降低效应,结论通过PSM-DID稳健性检验;(2)“双减”政策对学生参加“学期中和寒暑假”“线上和线下”“学科类”校外培训存在显著降低效应,结论通过PSM-DID稳健性检验;(3)“双减”政策对学生家庭“非学科类”校外培训参与和支出存在显著增加效应,结论未通过PSM-DID稳健性检验;(4)异质性分析发现“双减”政策显著降低了中低社会经济地位学生家庭的“学科类”校外培训参与和支出,对高社会经济地位学生家庭不存在显著影响。本文研究结论为评估“双减”政策工作目标达成程度提供了证据,为实施“双减”政策提出了政策建议:不断巩固“学科类”校外培训治理成果,加强“非学科类”校外培训监管,加大力度治理“学科类”校外培训“隐形变异”问题。

本文引用格式

庞小冬 , 薛海平 , 肖凤秋 . “双减”政策对学生家庭校外培训参与和支出的影响[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2025 , 43(1) : 17 -36 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.01.002

Abstract

The “Double Reduction” policy proposes the goal of “reducing the burden of off-campus tutoring expenditures on the families of students in the compulsory education stage.” However, there is currently a lack of research to evaluate the degree of achievement of this policy goal. This study uses a large sample survey data of families of students in the compulsory education stage sampled nationwide, applying the difference-in-differences model (DID) to analyze the impact of the “Double Reduction” policy on the participation and expenditure of students’ families on off-campus tutoring. The study found that (1) the “Double Reduction” policy has significantly reduced the participation and expenditure of students’ families on “disciplinary” off-campus tutoring. The effect remain robust after applied PSM-DID model. (2) the “Double Reduction” policy has a significant reduction effect on student families’ participation in various “disciplinary” off-campus tutoring in “mid-semester, winter and summer vacations”, “online and offline”. The conclusion remain robust after applied PSM-DID model. (3) The “Double Reduction” policy has a significantly increasing effect on the participation and expenditure of students’ families in “non-disciplinary” off-campus tutoring, and the findings does not pass the PSM-DID robustness test. (4) Heterogeneity analysis found that the “double reduction” policy significantly reduced the participation and expenditure of “disciplinary” off-campus tutoring for families of students with middle and low socioeconomic backgrounds, but had no significant impact on families of students with high socioeconomic backgrounds. The research findings of this article provide evidence that the “Double Reduction” policy goal has been achieved. The government should strengthen the supervision of “disciplinary” off-campus tutoring, further strengthen the supervision of “non-disciplinary” off-campus tutoring, intensify efforts to manage the “invisible variation” problem of “non-disciplinary” off-campus tutoring.

参考文献

付卫东, 李伟. (2023). “双减”背景下非学科类校外培训能改善中小学生的心理健康状态吗?——基于东中西部6省30个县(市、区)的调查. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 62 (01), 171- 180.
  高巍, 杨根博, 龚欣. (2023). “双减”政策下中小学课后服务实施质量研究——基于7省25区县的实证调查. 宏观质量研究, 11 (06), 120- 128.
  高毅. (2022). 为了庄严的承诺——写在“双减”政策实施一周年之际. 中国教育报, 2022-07-25(001).
  教育部. (2022a). 全国“双减”试点城市积极探索 校外培训监管工作进展顺利.取自教育部网站: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202205/t20220516_627854.html.
  教育部. (2022b). 教育部部署开展校外培训“监管护苗”暑期专项行动 严厉打击学科类培训隐形变异等突出问题. 取自教育部网站:http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202207/t20220721_647702.html.
  李春玲. (2003). 社会政治变迁与教育机会不平等——家庭背景及制度因素对教育获得的影响(1940—2001). 中国社会科学, 03, 86- 98+207.
  刘丹, 薛海平. (2023). 区隔的“双减”: “双减”对学生家庭课外补习行为影响分析——基于生态系统理论的质性研究. 现代远距离教育, 4, 22- 33.
  刘钧燕. (2023). “双减”能消除学科类校外培训需求吗?. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (09), 71- 84.
  刘若鸿, 黄玖立. (2023). 地方产业政策与债券融资成本. 中国工业经济, 6, 118- 136.
  刘伟. (2015). 政策试点: 发生机制与内在逻辑——基于我国公共部门绩效管理政策的案例研究. 中国行政管理, 5, 113- 119.
  罗艳华, 程红艳. (2023). “双减”政策减负成效及其影响因素分析. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 50 (04), 88- 95.
  孟庆国, 王友奎. (2023). 数字经济视域下政府治理创新的取向与逻辑. 行政管理改革, 12, 14- 23.
  宁本涛, 陈祥梅, 袁芳, 张耀贞. (2022). “减轻校外培训负担”实施成效及生态复合治理机制透析——基于我国152个地级市“校外培训负担”现状的调查. 中国电化教育, 7, 50- 57.
  祁占勇, 王书琴. (2022). “双减”政策执行的碎片化困境及整体性治理. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 21 (06), 13- 22+74.
  宋弘, 罗吉罡, 黄炜. (2022). 教育扶贫与人力资本积累: 事实、机制与政策含义. 世界经济, 45 (10), 3- 27.
  孙菊, 王静茹, 李浩淼. (2024). 从“碎片”到“整体”: 老年健康治理的逻辑与实践. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 54 (01), 97- 109.
  孙文凯, 王乙杰. (2016). 父母外出务工对留守儿童健康的影响——基于微观面板数据的再考察. 经济学(季刊), 15 (03), 963- 988.
  魏易. (2024). 减负政策的短期效果评估: 基于中国教育财政 家庭调查的分析. 中国教育财政, 11, 11- 13.
  徐玲, 李威璎. (2023). 地方政府“双减”政策弹性的研究. 上海教育科研, 12, 1- 6.
  赵婀娜. (2022). “双减”也需做好教育管理“加法”. 人民日报, 2022-3-15(005).
  中国儿童中心课题组. (2023). “双减”背景下儿童校外生活状况报告: 技术报告. 中国校外教育, (06), 11- 24.
  周黎安. (2022). 晋升锦标赛 文献评述与研究展望. 经济管理学刊, 1 (01), 1- 34.
  Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 3- 32.
  Callaway, B., Goodman-Bacon, A., & Sant'Anna, P. H. (2024). Difference-in-differences with a continuous treatment. National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w32117.
  Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Gu, X., & Zhou, L. A. (2020). Arrival of young talent: The send-down movement and rural education in China. American Economic Review, 110 (11), 3393- 3430.
  Nunn, N., & Qian, N. (2011). The potato’s contribution to population and urbanization: evidence from a historical experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (2), 593- 650.
  Perri 6, Leat, D., Seltzer, K., & Stoker, K. (2002). Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave.
  Perri 6. (1997). Holistic Government. London: Demos.
  Pinotti, P. (2017). Clicking on heaven’s door: the effect of immigrant legalization on crime. American Economic Review, (107), 138- 68.
  Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1), 41- 55.
  Wang, S., & Yang, D. Y. (2021). Policy experimentation in China: the political economy of policy learning. National Bureau of Economic Research. No. w29402.
  Zhang, W. (2020). Shadow education in the service of tiger parenting: strategies used by middle-class families in China. European Journal of Education, 55 (3), 388- 404.
文章导航

/