Does Reflection Improve Teachers’ Classroom Behavior Continuously: Based on a Longitudinal Study of Teachers with Different Teaching Philosophy

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.10.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Reflection is an important way to promote the professional development of primary and secondary school teachers. This study conducted a multi-level linear growth model analysis based on three waves of a longitudinal study of 301 primary and secondary school teachers over one year. In this study, the developmental trend of teachers' classroom behaviour, and the influence of reflection on the developmental trend of teachers’ classroom behaviour were described, then the classroom behavior effects with different teaching philosophies through conducting reflection were discussed. The results show that teachers’ classroom behaviour will be significantly and continuously improved with the implementation of reflection. Reflection has different continuous effects on teachers with different teaching philosophies. Teachers who hold a teaching philosophy of student-centeredness are more likely to obtain positive effects of classroom behaviour in the process of reflection. Because of the positive and continuous influence of reflection on teachers’ classroom behaviour, teachers should be guided to form a “student-centeredness” teaching philosophy and should improve classroom behaviour through conducting reflection in the future.

Key words: reflection, teachers’ classroom behavior, teaching philosophy, longitudinal study

Fan Yang, Yuxuan He, Zhichen Xia. Does Reflection Improve Teachers’ Classroom Behavior Continuously: Based on a Longitudinal Study of Teachers with Different Teaching Philosophy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(10): 17-28.

Figures/Tables 5

	课堂教学行为			情感关怀行为			课堂管理行为
固定效应	模型1	模型2	模型3	模型1	模型2	模型3	模型1	模型2	模型3
截距, π_0i
均值β₀₀	3.724^*** (0.044)	3.645^*** (0.054)	2.312^*** (0.890)	4.010^*** (0.037)	3.845^*** (0.050)	2.349^*** (0.268)	3.105^*** (0.102)	1.405^*** (0.100)	1.234^*** (1.045)
性别β₀₁			0.321 (0.305)			0.095 (0.112)			0.489 (0.491)
教龄β₀₂			0.003 (0.022)			0.012 (0.010)			0.011 (0.028)
学历β₀₃			?0.005 (0.358)			0.101 (0.104)			0.251 (0.423)
时间, π_1i
变化趋势β₁₀		0.079^* (0.042)	?0.192 (0.203)		0.165^*** (0.035)	?0.147 (0.146)		0.170^*** (0.077)	1.301^*** (0.289)
性别β₁₁			?0.068 (0.081)			?0.068 (0.057)			0.221⁺ (0.116)
教龄β₁₂			0.006 (0.005)			0.005 (0.004)			0.007 (0.007)
学历β₁₃			0.079 (0.083)			0.111⁺ (0.058)			0.049 (0.119)
价值反思, π_2i
变化趋势β₂₀			0.415 (0.415)			0.223^*** (0.051)			0.440^*** (0.206)
性别β₂₁			?0.101 (0.151)			?0.174^* (0.070)			?0.074 (0.071)
教龄β₂₂			0.000 (0.009)			?0.003 (0.006)			0.002 (0.004)
学历β₂₃			0.053 (0.173)			0.144 (0.080)			0.253^** (0.089)
教学反思, π_3i
变化趋势β₃₀			0.796^*** (0.451)			0.751^*** (0.188)			0.875^** (0.265)
性别β₃₁			0.031 (0.145)			0.198^** (0.061)			?0.084 (0.103)
教龄β₃₂			?0.001 (0.009)			0.000 (0.005)			?0.007 (0.006)
学历β₃₃			?0.052 (0.189)			0.170^* (0.069)			0.299^** (0.105)
学术反思, π_4i
变化趋势β₄₀			0.555⁺ (0.297)			0.081 (0.062)			0.619^*** (0.061)
性别β₄₁			0.112 (0.089)			?0.012 (0.024)			0.000 (0.023)
教龄β₄₂			?0.019 (0.091)			?0.002 (0.002)			?0.001 (0.001)
学历β₄₃			0.003 (0.008)			0.020 (0.025)			0.039 (0.027)
随机效应
第一层, D(e_ti)	0.120	0.033	0.031	0.143	0.121	0.109	0.032	0.021	0.020
第二层, D(r_0i)	0.040^***	0.308^***	0.210^***	0.05^***	0.156^***	0.128^***	0.06^***	1.185^***	1.180^***
第二层, D(r_1i)		0.020	0.020		0.047^*	0.045^*		0.007	0.007

References 0

	杜威. (2005). 我们怎样思维•经验与教育(姜文闵译). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
	林一钢. (2008). 论“实践反思性”教师教育. 教师教育研究, 20 (6), 7- 11+71.
	卢乃桂, 钟亚妮. (2007). 教师专业发展理论基础的探讨. 教育研究, (3), 17- 22.
	孟迎芳, 连榕, 郭春彦. (2004). 专家—熟手—新手型教师教学策略的比较研究. 心理发展与教育, 20 (4), 70- 73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2004.04.013
	闵钟. (2019). 论教师有效反思的理论观照. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (1), 149- 155+161+172.
	石中英, 余清臣. (2005). 关怀教育: 超越与界限—诺丁斯关怀教育理论述评. 教育研究与实验, (4), 30- 33.
	王福兴, 申继亮, 田宏杰, 周宗奎. (2010). 专家与新手教师对静态课堂教学场景的知觉差异. 心理发展与教育, 26 (6), 612- 617.
	王陆, 李瑶. (2017). 课堂教学行为大数据透视下的教学现象探析. 电化教育研究, 38 (4), 77- 85.
	魏淑华, 宋广文, 张大均. (2013). 我国中小学教师职业认同的结构与量表. 教师教育研究, 25 (1), 55- 60+75.
	徐锦芬, 李斑斑. (2012). 中国高校英语教师教学反思现状调查与研究. 外语界, (4), 6- 15.
	徐瑾劼. (2021). 以学生为主体的“参与式”课堂教学水平的跨国比较—基于OECD全球教学洞察视频研究数据的聚类分析. 全球教育展望, 50 (1), 117- 128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9670.2021.01.010
	杨帆, 许庆豫. (2015). “教师中心”与“学生中心”教学理念辨析—基于中小学教师的问卷调查. 高等教育研究, 36 (12), 78- 86.
	朱雁, 徐瑾劼. (2019). TALIS2018视域下中英初中数学课堂的审视与比较. 中国教育学刊, (11), 24- 30.
	Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom Organization and Management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed. ), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.
	Elliott, J. (2006). Conceptualising Relationships Between Research/ Evaluation Procedures and In-service Teacher Education. Journal of In-service Education, 4 (1-2), 102- 115.
	Farrell, T. S. C. , & Press, C. (2004). Reflective Practice in Action: 80 Reflection Breaks for Busy Teachers. Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
	Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods*, 39 (2), 175- 191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
	Goleman, D. (1999). What Makes a Leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 123—131.
	Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: 31 Meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 363- 386. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.363
	Jari-Erik, N., Jaana, V., Asko, T., & Kaisa, A. (2012). Teachers Adapt Their Instruction According to Students' Academic Performance. Educational Psychology, 32 (5), 571- 588. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2012.675645
	Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2014). Teacher Competencies for the Implementation of Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Framework and Research Review. Educational Psychology Review, 27 (3), 505- 536.
	Larrivee, B. (2008). Meeting the Challenge of Preparing Reflective Practitioners. The New Educator, 4 (2), 87- 106. doi: 10.1080/15476880802014132
	Norlander, K. A., Reagan, T. G., & Case, C. W. (1999). The Professional Teacher. The Preparation and Nurturance of the Reflective Practitioner. Agenda for education in a Democracy. Volume 4. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
	Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307- 332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
	Pang, J. S. (2003). Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Korean Elementary Mathematics Classrooms. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (3), 445- 452.
	Roessger, K. M. (2014). The Effect of Reflective Activities on Instrumental Learning in Adult Work-related Education: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research. Educational Research Review, (13), 17- 34.
	Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books. Inc. Publishers.
	Singh, G. S. (2014). The Nature of Reflective Practice and Emotional Intelligence in Tutorial Settings. Journal of Education & Learning, 3 (1), 86- 100.
	Zeichner, K. M. , & Liston, D. P. (2014). Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18
1价值反思T1	1
2价值反思T2	0.76^**	1
3价值反思T3	0.46^**	0.42^**	1
4教学反思T1	0.59^**	0.48^**	0.19^**	1
5教学反思T2	0.74^**	0.58^**	0.45^**	0.39^**	1
6教学反思T3	0.94^**	0.74^**	0.40^**	0.54^**	0.67^**	1
7学术反思T1	0.22^**	0.19^**	0.05	0.20^**	0.21^**	0.20^**	1
8学术反思T2	0.15^*	0.14^*	0.01	0.18^**	0.15^**	0.11^*	0.88^**	1
9学术反思T3	0.19^**	0.16^**	0.07	0.14^*	0.18^**	0.19^**	0.84^**	0.73^**	1
10课堂教学T1	0.24^**	0.18^**	0.21^**	0.11^*	0.23^**	0.19^**	0.13^*	0.07	0.12^*	1
11课堂教学T2	0.18^**	0.13^*	0.16^**	0.12^*	0.15^**	0.15^*	0.14^*	0.06	0.15^*	0.76^**	1
12课堂教学T3	0.10	0.11	0.02	0.05	0.10	0.12^*	0.04	0.02	0.03	0.30^**	0.30^**	1
13情感关怀T1	0.42^**	0.35^**	0.25^**	0.24^**	0.40^**	0.38^**	0.19^**	0.14^*	0.21^**	0.34^**	0.30^**	0.12^*	1
14情感关怀T2	0.34^**	0.30^**	0.16^**	0.18^**	0.34^**	0.30^**	0.20^**	0.19^**	0.23^**	0.31^**	0.28^**	0.14^*	0.84^**	1
15情感关怀T3	0.23^**	0.14^*	0.13^*	0.19^**	0.21^**	0.20^**	0.18^**	0.13^*	0.15^**	0.28^**	0.34^**	0.06	0.68^**	0.58^**	1
16课堂管理T1	0.65^**	0.49^**	0.27^**	0.30^**	0.50^**	0.62^**	0.11	0.02	0.11	0.18^**	0.09	0.12^*	0.36^**	0.30^**	0.18^**	1
17课堂管理T2	0.47^**	0.32^**	0.18^**	0.30^**	0.29^**	0.45^**	0.10	0.06	0.10	0.05	0.09	0.00	0.24^**	0.16^**	0.16^**	0.68^**	1
18课堂管理T3	0.51^**	0.33^**	0.15^*	0.28^**	0.38^**	0.50^**	0.12^*	0.03	0.15^**	0.14^*	0.15^**	0.11	0.29^**	0.23^**	0.21^**	0.78^**	0.66^**	1
M	3.81	3.87	3.88	3.81	3.87	3.85	1.03	1.16	1.13	3.41	3.53	3.86	4.06	4.15	4.16	4.21	4.24	4.26
SD	0.56	0.45	0.58	0.55	0.46	0.57	1.23	1.29	1.29	0.54	0.62	0.72	0.47	0.52	0.49	0.48	0.47	0.44

[1]	Daoyu Yang. What Are Discipline Practices: Based on the Perspective of Ontology [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(12): 73-81.
[2]	Yi Jiang. Developmental Trajectory of High School Students’ Academic Motivation and Its Relation with Academic Achievement [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(11): 80-91.
[3]	Ma Lihong, Wei Rui, Liu Jian, Ma Mingyan, Liu Yan, Gan Qiuling, Kang Cuiping, Xu Guanxing. Critical Thinking: Part II of the 5Cs Framework for Twenty-first Century Key Competences [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(2): 45-56.
[4]	Hou Huaiyin, Xu Lili. Dissemination and Reflection of Wolfgang Brezinka's Meta-Pedagogy in China [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(2): 144-150.
[5]	WANG Jia-Qiang. The NonReflective Approach to Teacher Development [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(4): 40-46.
[6]	CHEN Zhen-Hua. Problems in Teaching: Comprehension Based on the Development of Students’ Thinking [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(4): 30-39.
[7]	Sun Jie. The experiment of student performance assessment method in New China ——The New Research on Scoring Method of Five-point Scale [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(2): 1-6.
[8]	Cao Yongguo. Teachers’ Premise Reflection of Educational Activities: Crisis and Reconstruction [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2014, 32(1): 41-49.