“数据驱动的精准教学”何以可能？——基于培养教师数据智慧的视角

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.08.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

精准教学的教育理念已成为各国共识，智慧教育环境下海量多模态学习数据的生成也使数据驱动的精准教学范式转变成为可能，但目前运用数据解决复杂教学问题的实践存在许多挑战，其突破点在于培养教师的数据智慧。本文从教师数据智慧的角度回答了三个问题：是什么、如何培养以及有哪些影响因素。首先，数据智慧是教学实践经验、数据分析技能、学习科学理论三者的有机整合，其内涵在于数据到智慧的递进转化；在明晰数据智慧的实现路径是掌握数据探究循环的基础上，回应了“培养什么”的问题，并构建了从职前准备到职后发展的培养路径，即在职前阶段弱化学科界限、革新课程体系、创设“实境”学习环境，在职后阶段创新培训模式、组建数据实践共同体，在协作探究和反思性实践中发展集体数据智慧；最后，考虑到数据智慧的培养是一个复杂的、多方联动的动态过程，对其影响因素和作用机制进行了剖析，为教师数据智慧的培养策略提供借鉴，并提出了善用数据智慧的观点。

关键词: 数据智慧, 教师, 精准教学, 数据探究, 培养路径

Abstract:

The concept of precision teaching has become an international consensus, and wisdom education environment generating huge amounts of multimodal learning also make data-driven precision teaching paradigm possible. However, there are still many challenges in the practice of using data to solve complex teaching problem, the breakthrough is to cultivate teachers’ data wisdom. This article answers three questions from the perspective of teachers’ data wisdom: what is it, how to cultivate it, and what are the influencing factors. First of all, data wisdom is the integration of teaching practice experience, data analysis skills and learning sciences. Its connotation lies in the progressive transformation from data to wisdom. On the basis of clarifying that the realization path of data wisdom is to master the cycle of data inquiry, this paper answers the question of “what” to cultivate, and constructs the cultivating path from pre-service to in-service. In the pre-service stage, we should weaken the discipline boundaries, reform the curriculum system, and create a “reality” learning environment. In the in-service stage, we should innovate training pattern, establish data practice community, and develop collective data wisdom in collaborative inquiry and reflective practice. Finally, considering that the cultivation of data wisdom is a complex and multi-lateral dynamic process, this paper analyzes the influencing factors and mechanism of data wisdom, provides a reference for the cultivation strategy of teachers' data wisdom, and puts forward the viewpoint of making good use of data wisdom.

Key words: data wisdom, teacher, precision teaching, data inquiry cycle, cultivating path

彭晓玲, 吴忭. “数据驱动的精准教学”何以可能？——基于培养教师数据智慧的视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(8): 45-56.

Xiaoling Peng, Bian Wu. How is data-driven precision teaching possible? From the perspective of cultivating teacher’s data wisdom[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(8): 45-56.

图/表 4

参考文献 0

	李士平, 赵蔚, 刘红霞数据驱动下的学习支持设计与实践电化教育研究 2018 39 03 103 108+114 李士平, 赵蔚, 刘红霞. (2018). 数据驱动下的学习支持设计与实践. 电化教育研究,39(03),103—108+114.
	彭红超, 祝智庭人机协同的数据智慧机制: 智慧教育的数据价值炼金术开放教育研究 2018 2 41 50 彭红超, 祝智庭. (2018). 人机协同的数据智慧机制: 智慧教育的数据价值炼金术. 开放教育研究,(2),41—50.
	茹秀芳教师循证教学能力及培养研究教育理论与实 2016 3 58 61 茹秀芳. (2016). 教师循证教学能力及培养研究. 教育理论与实,(3),58—61.
	邵炯. 大数据催生体育教学新模式. 青年报, 2016−07−13(B07)
	万力勇, 黄志芳, & 黄焕大数据驱动的精准教学: 操作框架与实施路径现代教育技术 2019 29 01 32 38 万力勇, 黄志芳, & 黄焕. (2019). 大数据驱动的精准教学: 操作框架与实施路径. 现代教育技术,29(01),32—38.
	吴忭, 彭晓玲, 胡艺龄教育研究的去芜存菁之路: 从多模态叙事到证据公平——美国AERA 2019年会述评远程教育杂志 2019 37 04 13 23 吴忭, 彭晓玲, 胡艺龄. (2019). 教育研究的去芜存菁之路: 从多模态叙事到证据公平—美国AERA 2019年会述评. 远程教育杂志,37(04),13—23.
	杨甲睿, 黄甫全证据型教学决策在美国: 兴起、内涵、策略及其启示电化教育研究 2013 4 107 113 杨甲睿, 黄甫全. (2013). 证据型教学决策在美国: 兴起、内涵、策略及其启示. 电化教育研究,(4),107—113.
	杨现民, 骆娇娇, 刘雅馨, 陈世超数据驱动教学: 大数据时代教学范式的新走向电化教育研究 2017 38 12 13 20+26 杨现民, 骆娇娇, 刘雅馨, 陈世超. (2017). 数据驱动教学: 大数据时代教学范式的新走向. 电化教育研究,38(12),13—20+26.
	杨现民, 唐斯斯, 李冀红发展教育大数据: 内涵、价值和挑战现代远程教育研究 2016 1 50 61 杨现民, 唐斯斯, 李冀红. (2016). 发展教育大数据: 内涵、价值和挑战. 现代远程教育研究,(1),50—61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2016.01.007
	郑红苹, & 崔友兴 “互联网+ 教育” 下循证教学的理念与路径教育研究 2018 8 16 郑红苹, & 崔友兴. (2018). “互联网+ 教育” 下循证教学的理念与路径. 教育研究,(8),16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5582.2018.08.004
	祝智庭 & 彭红超信息技术支持的高效知识教学: 激发精准教学的活力中国电化教育 2016 1 17 25 祝智庭 & 彭红超. (2016). 信息技术支持的高效知识教学: 激发精准教学的活力. 中国电化教育,(1),17—25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2016.01.003
	祝智庭, 孙妍妍, 彭红超解读教育大数据的文化意蕴电化教育研究 2017 38 01 28 36 祝智庭, 孙妍妍, 彭红超. (2017). 解读教育大数据的文化意蕴. 电化教育研究,38(01),28—36.
	Ackoff, R. L From data to wisdom Journal of applied systems analysis 1989 16 1 3 9 Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of applied systems analysis, 16(1), 3—9.
	Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Available at http://www.outsights.com/systems/dikw/dikw.htm
	Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., & Murnane, R. J. (2013). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
	Campaign, D. Q. (2014). Teacher Data Literacy: It’s about Time. Data Quality Campaign. Washington, DC: Author.
	Chen, B From theory use to theory building in learning analytics: A commentary on “Learning analytics to support teachers during synchronous CSCL” Journal of Learning Analytics 2015 2 2 163 168 Chen, B. (2015). From theory use to theory building in learning analytics: A commentary on “Learning analytics to support teachers during synchronous CSCL”. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(2), 163—168. doi: 10.18608/jla.2015.22.12
	Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O Research on data use: A framework and analysis Measurement Interdisciplinary Research Perspectives 2011 9 4 173 206 Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement Interdisciplinary Research Perspectives, 9(4), 173—206. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
	Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics Knowing Learning Instruction 1987 453 494 Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing Learning Instruction, 453—494.
	Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research Journal of Educational Change 2016 17 1 7 28 Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7—28. doi: 10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
	Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use Journal of Educational Administration 2013 51 3 341 362 Datnow, A., Park, V., & Kennedy-Lewis, B. (2013). Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 341—362. doi: 10.1108/09578231311311500
	Desimone, L. M Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures Educational Researcher 2009 38 3 181 199 Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181—199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140
	Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M Becoming data driven: The influence of teachers’ sense of efficacy on concerns related to data-driven decision making Journal of Experimental Education 2013 81 2 222 241 Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013). Becoming data driven: The influence of teachers’ sense of efficacy on concerns related to data-driven decision making. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(2), 222—241. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2012.699899
	Erickson, B., & Nosanchuk, T. (1992). Understanding data. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
	Farrell, C. C., & Marsh, J. A Contributing conditions: A qualitative comparative analysis of teachers’ instructional responses to data Teaching and Teacher Education 2016 60 398 412 Farrell, C. C., & Marsh, J. A. (2016). Contributing conditions: A qualitative comparative analysis of teachers’ instructional responses to data. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 398—412. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.010
	Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education International Journal of Educational Research 2016 80 1 14 Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M. (2016). Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 1—14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.004
	Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., Kleij, F. V. D., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. M Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations Teaching and Teacher Education 2016 60 377 386 Hoogland, I., Schildkamp, K., Kleij, F. V. D., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., Veldkamp, B., & Dijkstra, A. M. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377—386. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.012
	Lindsley, O. R Precision teaching’s unique legacy from B. F. Skinner Journal of Behavioral Education 1991 1 2 253 266 Lindsley, O. R. (1991). Precision teaching’s unique legacy from B. F. Skinner. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(2), 253—266. doi: 10.1007/BF00957007
	Mandinach, E. B A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice Educational Psychologist 2012 47 2 71 85 Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71—85. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
	Mcnaughton, S., Mei, K. L., & Hsiao, S Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: a replication series across clusters of schools School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2012 23 2 203 228 Mcnaughton, S., Mei, K. L., & Hsiao, S. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: a replication series across clusters of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 203—228. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2011.652126
	Mudrick, N. V. (2018). Designing adaptive intelligent tutoring systems: Fostering cognitive, affective, and metacognitive self-regulated learning processes using multimodal, Multichannel Process Data. Unpublished dissertation.
	Pierce, R., Chick, H., Watson, J., Les, M., & Dalton, M A statistical literacy hierarchy for interpreting educational system data Australian Journal of Education 2014 58 2 195 217 Pierce, R., Chick, H., Watson, J., Les, M., & Dalton, M. (2014). A statistical literacy hierarchy for interpreting educational system data. Australian Journal of Education, 58(2), 195—217. doi: 10.1177/0004944114530067
	Reeves, T. D., & Chiang, J. L Online interventions to promote teacher data-driven decision making: Optimizing design to maximize impact Studies in Educational Evaluation 2018 59 256 269 Reeves, T. D., & Chiang, J. L. (2018). Online interventions to promote teacher data-driven decision making: Optimizing design to maximize impact. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 256—269. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.006
	Rowley, J The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy Journal of information science 2007 33 2 163 180 Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of information science, 33(2), 163—180. doi: 10.1177/0165551506070706
	Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Luyten, H., & Ebbeler, J Factors promoting and hindering data-based decision making in schools School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2014 28 1 17 Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Luyten, H., & Ebbeler, J. (2014). Factors promoting and hindering data-based decision making in schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28, 1—17.
	Schuff, D. (2018). Data science for all: a university-wide course in data literacy. In A. Deokar, A. Gupta, L. Iyer, and M. Jones (Eds.), Annals of Information Systems: Analytics and Data Science: Advances in Research and Pedagogy, Springer, 281-297.
	Thomas, R. S. (2007). Data Wise in Action: Stories of Schools Using Data to Improve Teaching and Learning. Harvard Education Press. Cambridge, MA.
	Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review Education Policy Analysis Archives 2010 18 1 40 Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18, 1—40. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v18n1.2010
	Zapatarivera, D., Zwick, R., & Vezzu, M. J. E. A Exploring the effectiveness of a measurement error tutorial in helping teachers understand score report results Educational Assessment 2016 21 3 215 229 Zapatarivera, D., Zwick, R., & Vezzu, M. J. E. A. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of a measurement error tutorial in helping teachers understand score report results. Educational Assessment, 21(3), 215—229. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2016.1202110

[1]	蔡红红. 教师在线教学准备与学生学习效果的关系探究——学习者控制与学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 27-37.
[2]	雷万鹏, 马红梅, 黄华明. 基于学生成绩残差分解技术的教师教学质量评价[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 84-91.
[3]	肖正德. 乡村振兴战略中乡村教师新乡贤角色担当意愿的相关影响因素分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 92-106.
[4]	程介明. 教研：中国教育的宝藏[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5): 1-11.
[5]	魏易, 罗滨, 林秀艳, 杨智君, 王梦. 区域教研对学生学业成绩影响的实证研究——以北京市海淀区为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5): 12-54.
[6]	谢晨, 尹弘飚. 教师视角下教研工作质量与发展均衡程度的省际比较[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(5): 55-67.
[7]	魏叶美, 范国睿. 教师参与学校治理意愿影响因素的实证研究——计划行为理论框架下的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 73-82.
[8]	李国强, 李志远. 城乡教师跨校交流中的匹配策略——基于“个人−组织匹配”的调查研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 83-95.
[9]	王陆, 马如霞, 彭玏. 基于经验学习圈的不同教师群体教学行为改进特征[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(2): 61-74.
[10]	余雅风, 王祈然. 教师的法律地位研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(1): 49-58.
[11]	宋萑, 田士旭, 吴雨宸. 职前教师培养实证研究的系统文献述评（2015—2019）[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(9): 78-102.
[12]	郑宏, 谢作栩, 王婧. 后疫情时代高校教师在线教学态度的调查研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 54-64.
[13]	[德]安德烈亚斯·施莱希尔（Andreas Schleicher）. 教育面向学生的未来，而不是我们的过去[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 1-21.
[14]	林小英, 薛颖. 大学人事制度改革的宏观逻辑和教师学术工作的微观行动：审计文化与学术文化的较量[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(4): 40-61.
[15]	胡劲松, 张晓伟. 教师惩戒行为及其规制[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(3): 25-31.