华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 85-99.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.07.007

• 高等教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

项目制背景下激励机制对高校SSCI科研产出的影响研究——基于2014—2018年36所“双一流”建设高校的面板数据分析

曹妍, 唐珊珊, 荀渊   

  1. 华东师范大学高等教育研究所，上海 200062
  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-04
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学重点课题“新时代提高教师地位的政策体系研究”（AFA200007）

Research on the Impact of Incentive Mechanism on SSCI Research Output of University Teachers under the Background of Project System: Based on Panel Data Analysis of 36 “Double First-class” Universities from 2014 to 2018

Yan Cao, Shanshan Tang, Yuan Xun   

  1. Institute of Higher Education of East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-04

RichHTML

43

PDF

225

摘要：

“双一流”建设高校教师的薪酬均来自于政府的财政拨款。21世纪以来，以“基本支出加项目支出”方式完成的经费划拨成为“双一流”建设高校资源配置的主要手段，其中基本支出形式构成了教师薪酬的基本激励部分，项目“发包”层层渗透的形式构成了教师薪酬的项目激励部分。本文选取2014—2018年36所“双一流”建设高校的财政支出数据为基础，结合高校滞后1—3年SSCI科研发表情况构成的面板数据，重点关注两种激励措施分别对教师SSCI科研产出数量和产出质量带来的短期与中长期影响及两者的协同或互动关系。研究发现：（1）短期来看，增加基本激励对教师的科研产出数量和产出质量均具有显著的推动作用，分解后基本激励具有积极显著的直接效应，且与项目激励相配合后具有相对微弱的调节效应；而增加项目激励对教师科研产出数量产生的积极效更多地依赖与基本激励相配合的调节效应，且对科研产出质量具有负向挤出效应，不存在调节效应。（2）从中长期来看，增加基本激励对教师科研产出具有的积极效应难以维持，存在显著的挤出效应；增加项目激励对教师科研产出的作用也较为微弱，且对其科研产出质量存在负向挤出效应。

关键词: 项目制, 财政支出, 激励机制, 科研产出

Abstract:

The salaries of faculties in the “double first-class” universities are funded by the government. During the 21st century, “basic expenditure plus project funding” is the principal means of allocating resources for “double first-class” universities, while faculties’ basic incentives are mainly constituted by the basic expenditure and their project-oriented incentives are mainly constituted by project funding in the form of contracts penetrated layers by layers. This article collected the panel data by selecting 2014—2018 fiscal expenditure data of 36 double first-class universities, combining SSCI research publications of those universities the year after one to three years, focusing on the short-term and long-term impacts of university incentives and their coordinating and interacting under the project system on the quantity and quality of faculty scientific research output. The results show that, in the short term, increasing the basic incentive has a significant partial effect on the quantity and quality of teachers’ SSCI output and a slightly positive synergy effect along with project-based incentive mechanism. However, increasing project incentive has a weak positive effect on the number of teachers’ SSCI research output, only relying on the synergy effect with basic incentive mechanism and a negative extrusion effect on the quality of teachers’ SSCI research output. However, from the perspective of med-and-long term development, the positive effect of increasing basic incentives on teachers’ scientific research output is difficult to maintain, and there is a significant negative crowding effect; Increasing project incentive also has a weak effect on teachers’ scientific research output, and has a negative extrusion effect on the quality of their scientific research output.

Key words: project system, fiscal expenditure, incentive mechanism, scientific research output