论应试教育与学生创造力培养之间的关系

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.04.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

虽然很多人理所应当地认为，应试教育阻碍了中国学生创造力的发展，但目前没有基本的证据能证明中国学生总体创造力水平低于其他国家，因而不能简单断言应试教育制约了中国学生创造力的培养。但这并不意味着应试教育与学生创造力水平无关。一个更加合理的解释是：应试教育对不同类别学生的影响是不一样的，它对“抬升底部”卓有成效，但会比较明显地阻碍拔尖学生创造力的发展。这有直接和间接的多方面的事实证据支撑。应试教育对拔尖学生的创造力水平有着明显的负面作用，并不意味着其他群体的学生不受其影响，而是说在应试教育的环境下，拔尖学生受影响和制约的程度更加突出。借用“创造力成分理论”提供的分析框架，这种负面影响可能通过3个机制发生作用：即降低拔尖学生的知识掌握宽度和深度，降低冒险质疑精神以及对不确定的容忍态度，弱化学习的内在动机。虽然拔尖学生数量占比不多，但这不是小问题，而是直接关系国家安全和竞争力以及教育系统完善的大问题。

关键词: 应试教育, 创造力, 拔尖人才培养

Abstract:

Although many people rightly believe that exam-oriented education hinders the development of Chinese students’ creativity, there is no basic evidence to prove that the overall creativity level of Chinese students is lower than that of other countries. Therefore, it should not be simply asserted that exam-oriented education restricts the cultivation of Chinese students’ creativity. But this does not mean that exam-oriented education has nothing to do with students’ creativity. A reasonable explanation is that exam-oriented education has different effects on different types of students. It is effective in “raising the bottom”, but it will obviously hinder the creativity of top students. This is supported by many direct and indirect factual evidence. Although the number of highly creative students accounts for a small proportion, their creativity is affected, which is related to national security and competitiveness and deserves attention and vigilance. Exam-oriented education has a significant negative impact on the creativity level of top students, which does not mean that other groups of students are not affected by it. But in the environment of exam-oriented education, the top students are more affected and restricted. Using the analytical framework provided by the “the componential theory of creativity”, this negative impact can work through three mechanisms, that is, reducing the width and depth of top students’ knowledge mastery, reducing the spirit of adventure and questioning, as well as the tolerant attitude towards uncertainty, and weakening the internal motivation of learning.

Key words: exam- oriented education, creativity, cultivation of creative student

柯政, 梁灿. 论应试教育与学生创造力培养之间的关系[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(4): 72-82.

Zheng Ke, Can Liang. Research on the Relationship between Exam-oriented Education and Students’ Creativity[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(4): 72-82.

参考文献 0

	方帆. (2013). 中国学生缺乏创新能力的培养吗?. 少年儿童研究, (21), 29- 31.
	郭晶. (2009). 中国传统文化对青少年创造力的负面影响分析与对策. 继续教育研究, (02), 157- 159.
	洪智敏. (1998). 知识经济: 对传统经济理论的挑战. 经济研究, (06), 62- 65.
	柯政. (2010). 规范性制度对新课程政策实施的影响及其政策意义. 北京大学教育评论, (01), 101- 113+191.
	柯政. (2018). 高考改革需要更加重视科学学科. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (03), 13- 24+166.
	黎大志. (2018). 中小学教育创新人才培养缺失之原因探析. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, (05), 38- 43.
	凌光明, 刘欧. (2019). 中国高中生批判性思维能力的测量及其影响因素初探. 中国考试, (09), 1- 10.
	刘彭芝. (2010). 关于培养拔尖创新人才的几点思考. 教育研究, (7), 104- 107.
	庞维国. (2022). 创造性心理学视角下的创造性培养: 目标、原则与策略. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (11), 25- 40.
	澎湃新闻. (2017). 中国学生严谨但缺创造力?诺奖得主不赞同. 取自: http://edu.sina.com.cn/l/2019-11-01/doc-iicezuev6352341.shtml
	澎湃新闻. (2019). “数学大赛中国队全军覆没”, 别忽略背后的“勤能补拙”陷阱. 取自: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_3072123
	乔磊. (2010). 中国孩子为什么缺少创造力. 内蒙古教育, (05), 49.
	钱颖一. (2016). 均值高方差小. 北京日报(016).
	搜狐网. (2016). 第2期: 审辩式思维是创新型人才的特征. 取自: http://www.sohu.com/a/72052839_372532
	孙瑶君. (2009). 大学生创造力缺乏的原因及对策. 中国电力教育, (03), 170- 171.
	文汇报. (2013). 上海教育再问鼎, 制胜点何在. 取自: https://www.163.com/sports/article/9F826IF80005227R.html
	吴世影. (2010). 倒数第一: 谁扼杀了中国孩子的想象力. 课堂内外(高中版), (10), 7.
	徐晶晶, 徐星, 方兆玉, 邱旻玮. (2013). 专访PISA之父Andreas Schleicher. 上海: 从标准化和服从到创造力和引领. 上海教育, (35), 18.
	习近平. (2021). 深入实施新时代人才强国战略加快建设世界重要人才中心和创新高地. 求是(24)
	夏欣. (2004). 中小学数学教育该怎样引导——采访著名数学家、中科院院士杨乐. 班主任, (05), 12- 13.
	谢小庆. (2017). 关于高考40年的审辩式思考. 中国考试, (05), 23- 27.
	姚姚. (2015). 我们的孩子真的缺乏创造力吗? 文汇报 (007).
	阎光才. (2011). 关于创造力、创新与体制化的教育——兼析中美阶段性教育制度设计理念的差异. 教育学报, (01), 15- 20.
	余小燕. (2010). 对中国孩子想象力排名倒数第一的冷思考. 小学德育, (24), 5.
	张东阳. (2011). 不能再对“中国孩子想象力倒数第一”漠然视之. 宁夏教育, (02), 63.
	周林, 查子秀, 施建农. (1995). 5、7年级儿童的图形创造性思维(FGA)测验的比较研究────中德技术创造力跨文化研究结果之一. 心理发展与教育, 1, 19-23.
	周绍禄. (2011). 打破应试教育的桎梏是培养创新精神的前提. 天津教育报(003).
	中国教育网. (2016). 中国学生与丹麦教育PK如何取胜. 取自: http://xiaoxue.eol.cn/focus/news/201609/t20160929_1454145_12.shtml
	中国新闻网. (2017). 专家: 中国学校在发掘学生创造力方面已超越澳洲. 取自: http://edu.gmw.cn/2017-10/10/content_26464636.htm
	朱明明, 万文涛. (2017). 中美创新人才成长规律比较分析研究. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), (04), 209- 217.
	Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46 (1), 3- 15. doi: 10.1002/jocb.001
	Baumol, W. J. (2005). Education for innovation: Entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvements. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 5, 33- 56. doi: 10.1086/ipe.5.25056170
	Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (2), 171- 187. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033002004
	Collins, M. , & Amabile, T. (1999). Motivation and Creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed. ), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 297−312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51 (2), 113- 127. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229
	Educational Testing Service. (1992). Learning Mathematics. Report of The International Assessment of Educational Progress.
	Educational Testing Service. (1992). Learning Science. Report of The International Assessment of Educational Progress.
	Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. The American Psychologist, 49 (8), 725- 747. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725
	Hu, W., Adey, P., Shen, J., & Lin, C. (2004). The comparisons of the development of creativity between English and Chinese adolescents. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36 (6), 718- 731.
	Jellen, H. G., & Urban, K. K. (1989). Assessing creative potential world-wide: The first cross-cultural application of the test for creative Thinking—Drawing production (TCT-DP). Gifted Education International, 6 (2), 78- 86. doi: 10.1177/026142948900600204
	Mihaly C. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
	Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36 (4), 225- 241. doi: 10.1080/00207590143000036
	Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influences on student creativity: The case of china. Psychology in the Schools, 40 (1), 103- 114. doi: 10.1002/pits.10072
	Pink D H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.
	Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., &Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the torrance tests of creative thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hongkong primary school children: a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30 (4), 417- 430. doi: 10.1080/00207599508246577
	Sternberg, R. J., &Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34 (1), 1- 31. doi: 10.1159/000277029
	Sternberg R J. (2018). The triarchic theory of successful intelligence. The Guilford Press.
	Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Reports, 66 (3), 1047- 1056. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.1047

[1]	顾泠沅. 45年：一项数学教改实验[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(4): 103-116.
[2]	侯浩翔, 张先义, 王旦. 教育机器人可以提升学生创造力吗?——基于48项实验与准实验研究的Meta分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(3): 99-111.
[3]	郝宁, 汤梦颖. 动机对创造力的作用:研究现状与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 107-114+138.
[4]	衣新发,王小娟,胡卫平. 创造力基因组学研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(3): 56-62.