华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 86-96.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.11.008

• 从在地到全球:中国教育史学知识生产与体系重构 • 上一篇    下一篇

马克思世界历史理论与全球教育史研究体系构建

周洪宇1,2, 周娜3   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学教育学部,西安 710000
    2. 华中师范大学教育学院,武汉 430079
    3. 信阳师范大学教育科学学院,河南信阳 464000
  • 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2025-11-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“高质量教育体系的理论内涵、指标体系、国际比较与建设路径研究”(24&ZD176)。

Marx’s Theory of World History and the Construction of a Research System for Global History of Education

Hongyu Zhou1,2, Na Zhou3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710000, China
    2. School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    3. School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
  • Online:2025-11-01 Published:2025-11-03

摘要:

当前我国教育史学界面临全球视野缺失的困境,亟须实现从民族国家叙事向全球史范式的转型。这一转型以批判性解构西方中心主义全球教育叙事和积极建构中国主体性话语为双重路径。基于马克思世界历史理论的认识论和方法论框架,本文剖析了西方全球教育叙事的理论局限:在认识论层面,未能揭示教育全球化的物质生产基础及其阶级性;在方法论层面,忽视了生产力革命与交往革命的辩证统一对教育全球化的历史塑造;在价值论层面,其提倡的“普遍主义”叙事本质上是资本主义现代性的意识形态建构。针对这些理论缺陷,我们构建了以“生产力-交往”辩证关系为核心的分析框架,将全球教育史置于生产体系与交流互鉴的双重维度中进行考察,并由此构建了体现中国立场的全球教育史观,以助力推动全球教育史研究的中国学派建设,重构全球教育史的话语权力格局,为构建人类命运共同体的全球教育治理提供历史参照和理论资源。

关键词: 马克思世界历史理论, 全球教育史, 教育全球化, 中国教育史学

Abstract:

Currently, the field of educational history in China faces the challenge of lacking a global perspective, urgently requiring a shift from nation-state narratives to a global history paradigm. This transformation follows a dual path: critically deconstructing the Western-centric global educational narrative and actively constructing a discourse of Chinese subjectivity. Based on the epistemological and methodological framework of Marx’s theory of world history, this paper analyzes the theoretical limitations of Western global educational narratives. At the epistemological level, they fail to reveal the material production basis of educational globalization and its class nature. At the methodological level, they overlook the dialectical unity of productive force revolutions and communication revolutions in shaping the history of educational globalization. At the axiological level, their advocated “universalism” is essentially an ideological construct of capitalist modernity. To address these theoretical shortcomings, an analytical framework centered on the dialectical relationship between “productive forces and communication” is constructed, examining global educational history through the dual dimensions of production systems and mutual exchange. This approach establishes a global educational history perspective that reflects China's stance, aiming to advance the development of a Chinese school of global educational history research, reshape the discourse power structure of global educational history, and provide historical references and theoretical resources for global educational governance in building a community with a shared future for humanity.

Key words: Marx’s theory of world history, global history of education, educational globalization, Chinese educational historiography