华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 56-77.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.004

• 方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

察器求道 转识成智：质性教育研究五年述评与学术共同体的使命展望

陈霜叶, 王奕婷   

  1. 华东师范大学课程与教学研究所，上海 200062
  • 发布日期:2020-09-15

Scrutinizing “Qi”, Seeking “Dao” and Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom: Critical Systematic Review of Qualitative Education Research in 2015—2019 and Mission Prospects of the Chinese Scholarly Community

Chen Shuangye, Wang Yiting   

  1. Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Published:2020-09-15

RichHTML

138

PDF

493

摘要： 自20世纪90年代中期北京大学陈向明教授引入质性研究方法以来，教育研究中的质性研究越来越多。自2015年至今，华东师范大学教育学部发起的“全国教育实证研究论坛”，进一步推动了质性研究以及包含质性部分的混合研究的发展。本文先以“道”与“器”为比喻，区分了学术共同体的科学精神追求与质性研究的形制特征，建议在学术共同体层面重新理解“科学化”与中国学术研究的使命。然后，我们以2015—2019年在教育学CSSCI期刊上发表的质性研究论文为主要研究对象，具体从研究设计、抽样方式、质性数据获取、质性数据分析、研究信效度与研究伦理等形制特征，在纵向上与2000—2014年发表的教育学CSSCI期刊论文、在横向上与2015—2019年英国、美国及欧洲大陆的四本教育学综合期刊论文进行比较，揭示了自“全国教育实证研究论坛”开办五年来国内质性教育研究的发展特征与趋势。最后，我们希望推动国内学术共同体凝聚“察器求道，转识成智”的共识，推进中国教育研究的国际化、中国化与多样化的使命。

关键词: 质性研究, 混合研究, 道与器, 学术共同体, 研究综述

Abstract: The number of qualitative education research has mounted since the mid of 1990’s when Professor Chen Xiangming at Peking University introduced it into China. In 2015, the Faculty of Education of East China Normal University launched a national “Educational Empirical Research Forum”, which accelerated the development of qualitative research and mixed research with qualitative design. This paper first draws on the Chinese traditional concepts of “Dao” and “Qi” to distinguish the scientific pursuit of the scholarly community and the forms of qualitative research, and proposes to revisit the “scientific” mission of the Chinese education research. Then, this paper scrutinizes the qualitative research papers published in the 37 key Chinese education journals in 2015—2019, focusing on the research design, sampling method, qualitative data source, qualitative data analysis, credibility and ethics. By comparing those qualitative research papers published in 2004—2014 with English qualitative papers published in 2015—2019 in four top education journals in the United Kingdom, the United States and Europe, this review reveals the patterns and features of the qualitative education research in China in the past five years. Finally, this paper concludes by encouraging the Chinese scholarly community to consolidate their consensus and further the internationalization, localization and diversification of Chinese education research.

Key words: qualitative research, mixed research, Dao and Qi, scholarly community, systematic review