华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 97-107.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.11.008

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

支持个性化发展的学习者评价之哲理溯源——基于胡塞尔现象学的分析

白倩1, 侯家英2, 李艺2   

  1. 1. 安徽师范大学教育科学学院,安徽芜湖 241000
    2. 南京师范大学教育科学学院,南京 210097
  • 接受日期:2023-05-31 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-10-27
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“混合学习环境下高校教师评价素养提升路径研究”(AHSKQ2022D095)

A Philosophical Tracing of Learner Evaluation in Support of Individualized Development: Based on Husserl’s Phenomenological Analysis

Qian Bai1, Jiaying Hou2, Yi Li2   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu Anhui 241000, China
    2. School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
  • Accepted:2023-05-31 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-10-27

摘要:

学习者个性化发展评价是支持教育变革与发展的重要问题,需要有坚实的理论依据。梳理胡塞尔现象学的认识论成就可以发现,其逻辑体系中贯穿的时间与发生思想、个性化构造思想以及交互主体性与同一个世界思想可以作为思考学习者个性化发展评价的起点,且可以解释个性化发展与一般性教学目标之间的关系。同时,马飞龙的现象图析学也可以作为解释工具纳入其中。据此,本文在审思当前个性化发展评价的成就与不足的基础上,对胡塞尔现象学一脉的核心思想进行阐释,并就学习者个性化发展评价问题给出系统性解释:要融入时间性以理解评价过程;要融入结构性以理解评价内容;要尊重学习者的主体性以思考评价主体之间的关系。

关键词: 个性化发展, 学习者评价, 教学目标, 结果空间

Abstract:

The evaluation of learners’ individual development is an important issue to support the development of education, which needs a solid theoretical basis. However, the work in this area is far from enough. Combing the epistemological achievements of Husserl’s phenomenology, we find that the thoughts of time and occurrence, individualized construction, interactive subjectivity and the same world running through his logical system can be used as the starting point for thinking about the evaluation of learners’ individualized development, and can well explain the coordination between individualized development and the generality of teaching objectives. Marton F’s phenomenology can also be included as an explanatory tool. Therefore, on the basis of reviewing the achievements and shortcomings of the current individualized development evaluation, this paper explains the core idea of Husserl’s phenomenology, discusses the individualized development evaluation from three aspects: the timeliness of the evaluation process, the structure of the evaluation content and the relationship between the evaluation subjects, and gives a systematic explanation on the evaluation of learners’ individualized development based on the epistemological thinking of Husserl et al.

Key words: personalized development, learner evaluation, teaching objectives, outcome space