“中心-边缘”格局下中国社会科学的本土化-国际化张力：一个历史比较分析

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.06.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在全球社会科学研究的版图中，美国、英国、德国、法国长期以来被认为处于中心位置，其他国家则处于半边缘或边缘的位置。自20世纪90年代以来，中国社会科学研究在着力追求国际化的同时，也涌现出了强烈的本土化诉求，形成了本土化-国际化的二重张力。本文认为，这种张力与焦虑源于我国在现代全球社会科学知识生产体系中较长时期处于边缘地位并寻求突破。从国际比较的视野来看，本土化与国际化之间的张力并不局限于中国，印度、土耳其等非中心国家也存在强烈的本土化需求。从历史维度来看，本土化的诉求自从20世纪初西方社会科学开始广泛而系统地传入非西方世界时即存在，而以英文学术发表为标志的“输出的国际化”则起源于20世纪50至60年代的欧洲大陆，并在20世纪90年代后波及东亚和拉美等各个地区。当前，随着中国科研实力的崛起，传统的学术中心边缘格局正在受到挑战。随着中国的学术研究日益从边缘走向中心，中国社会科学研究正处于从“输入的国际化”到“输出的国际化”转型的关键阶段，必须从“取经”“效仿”的阶段迈向“自觉”的阶段，兼顾好在中文发表与英文发表之间的平衡。

关键词: 学科建设, 国际化, 本土化, 多语性, 社会科学, “中心-边缘”

Abstract:

In the global landscape of social science research, countries like the United States, Britain, Germany, and France occupy central positions, while others, including China, remain in semi-peripheral or peripheral positions. Since the 1990s, Chinese social science research has pursued internationalization while grappling with the demand for indigenization, creating a dual tension between these two goals. This article argues that the anxiety surrounding these dynamics stems from China’s marginal role in the global knowledge system. From an international comparative perspective, this tension is not unique to China. Non-central countries like India and Turkey also exhibit strong indigenization needs. Historically, the demand for indigenization arose from the introduction of Western social sciences to the non-Western world in the early 20th century. However, the “internationalization of export,” characterized by publishing in English, began in continental Europe during the 1950s and 1960s and expanded to East Asia and Latin America after the 1990s. Currently, Chinese social science research is at a pivotal stage, transitioning from the “internationalization of import” to the “internationalization of export.” To navigate this transformation, a balance must be struck between publishing in Chinese and publishing in English. As a significant contributor to social

Key words: disciplinary construction, internationalization, indigenization, multilingualism, social sciences, center-periphery

沈文钦. “中心-边缘”格局下中国社会科学的本土化-国际化张力：一个历史比较分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2025, 43(6): 1-20.

Wenqin Shen. The Indigenization-Internationalization Tension of Chinese Social Sciences under the “Center-Periphery” Paradigm: A Historical Comparative Analysis[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2025, 43(6): 1-20.

图/表 2

表 1

表 2

参考文献

	阿里夫·德里克. (2015). 后革命时代的中国, (李冠南, 董一格译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
	彼得·卡赞斯坦(Peter J. Katzenstein),罗伯特·基欧汉(Robert O. Keohane), 斯蒂芬·克拉斯纳(Stephen D. Krasner)编. (2006). 世界政治理论的探索与争鸣, (秦亚青、苏长和译) 上海: 上海人民出版社.
	北京大学社会科学部. (2012). 社会科学研究: 秉承光荣传统, 续写历史辉煌. 取自: https://news.pku.edu.cn/ztrd/fzdjb/3616-243629.htm.
	陈学飞, 展立新. (2009). 我国高等教育发展观的反思. 高等教育研究, 30 (8), 1- 26.
	丁钢, 侯怀银, 谭维智等. (2021). 教育学的中国话语体系建构: 问题与路径. 基础教育, 18 (1), 13- 39+2.
	费孝通. (1994). 略谈中国的社会学. 社会学研究(1), 7.
	韩亚菲. (2015). 学科文化视角的国际发表奖励政策: 基于H大学的案例研究. 北京大学博士论文.
	何小清. (2008a). 建国以来大陆学术机构人文社会科学研究国际化学术产出定量分析——基于 SSCI, A&HCI (1956--2006) 的定量分析. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),23(4), 145—153.
	何小清. (2008b). 建国以来我国人文社会科学学术研究国际化发展学科分析——基于 SSCI, A&HCI （1956~ 2006）的定量分析. 东岳论丛, (3), 24- 31.
	华薇娜、刘艳华. (2009). 中国高校人文社会科学走向世界的历史进程——基于 SSCI 和 A&HCI 的数据调研与分析. 中国高教研究, (12), 30—34.
	黄俊杰. (2005). 论社会科学理论与汉学研究之关系——兼论欧美社会科学论著中的中国意象及其问题. 东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, (3), 40- 47.
	教育部. (2011). 高等学校哲学社会科学“走出去”计划(教社科[2011]5号). 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/ewebeditor/uploadfile/2011/11/09/20111109102729829.pdf (accessed 2023-10-11).
	教育部. (2012). 教育部关于全面提高高等教育质量的若干意见. 取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201203/t20120316_146673.html (accessed 2023-10-11).
	黎文. (2011). 全球高研院院长热议人文社会科学的机遇与挑战. 取自: https://cssrac.nju.edu.cn/xsdt/rdlw/20200102/i64567.html (accessed 2023-10-11).
	李剑鸣. (2003). 本土资源与外国史研究. 南开学报（哲学社会科学版）, (2), 52- 60.
	李梅, 丁钢, 张民选, 杨锐, 徐阳. (2018). 中国教育研究国际影响力的反思与前瞻. 教育研究, 39 (3), 12- 19.
	李潇潇, 左玥, 沈文钦. (2018). 谁获得了精英大学的教职——基于北大、清华 2011—2017 年新任教师的履历分析. 中国高教研究, (8), 47- 52.
	李友梅. (2016). 中国特色社会学学术话语体系构建的若干思考. 社会学研究, 31 (5), 27- 37+242.
	林南. (1986). 社会学中国化的下一步. 社会学研究, (1), 8: 89—96.
	鲁洁. (1993). 试论中国教育学的本土化. 高等教育研究, 14 (1), 33- 35.
	罗伯特•基欧汉. (2004). 局部全球化世界中的自由主义、权力与治理, (门洪华译) 北京: 北京大学出版社.
	马海燕. (2011). 中国将在海外建一批学术研究中心. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2011/11-21/3475976.shtml (accessed 2023-10-11).
	芮国强. (2008). 行政学本土化: 内涵, 意义及路径. 江海学刊, (6), 93- 97.
	沈文钦, 毛丹, 蔺亚琼. (2018). 科研量化评估的历史建构及其对大学教师学术工作的影响. 南京师大学报（社会科学版）, (5), 33- 42.
	孙国华. (2009). 中国特色社会主义法律体系研究. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社.
	魏姝. (2008). 中国政治学研究概况分析——基于CSSCI分析. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版)(5), 88—92.
	王绍光. (2010). 中国政治学三十年: 从取经到本土化. 中国社会科学, (6), 15- 23.
	夏勇, 贺卫方, 袁行霈, 林非, 谢冕, 茅于轼等. (2000). 二十一世纪的中国社会科学. 中国社会科学, (1), 15- 36+204.
	谢韬, Lee Sigelman. (2008). 中美政治学研究方法之比较. 浙江社会科学, (5), 11.
	谢宇. (2018). 走出中国社会学本土化讨论的误区. 社会学研究, (2), 1- 13.
	杨承训. (2009). 中国特色社会主义经济学. 北京: 人民出版社.
	杨锐. (2021). 中国高等教育国际化: 走出常识的陷阱. 北京大学教育评论, 19 (1), 165- 172.
	张光直. (1995). 考古人类学随笔. 台湾: 联经出版社.
	张优良. (2020). 地方高水平大学国际化改革研究. 北京: 科学出版社.
	郑慧. (2014). 论构建中国特色社会主义政治学话语体系. 政治学研究, (6), 12- 19.
	翟学伟. (2004). 人情、面子与权力的再生产. 社会学研究, (5), 48- 57.
	浙江大学. (2012). 关于印发《浙江大学专业技术职务评聘工作实施办法》的通知(浙大发人[2012]25号). 取自: https://hr.zju.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/6c/18/0a0a8699449c95681de0e71cc758/ba79a0f2-e5d4-4294-a201-89a4b861f457.pdf (accessed 2023-10-11).
	周志忍. (2012). 迈向国际化和本土化的有机统一: 中国行政学发展 30 年的回顾与前瞻. 公共行政评论, 5 (1), 10- 15.
	Aalbers, M. B., & Rossi, U. (2006). Beyond the Anglo-American hegemony in human geography: a European perspective. GeoJournal, 67 (2), 137- 147.
	Aalbers, M. B., & Rossi, U. (2007). A coming community: young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe. Social & Cultural Geography, 8 (2), 283- 302.
	Abbott, A. (2000). Reflections on the Future of Sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 29 (2), 296- 300.
	Achwan, R., Ganie-Rochman, M., Alamsyah, A. R., & Triana, L. (2020). University reform and the development of social sciences in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102269.
	Akiwowo, A. (1988). Universalism and indigenisation in sociological theory: Introduction. International Sociology, 3(2), 155—160.
	Alatas, S. F. (1993). On the indigenization of academic discourse. Alternatives, 18 (3), 307- 338.
	Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current sociology, 51 (6), 599- 613.
	Alger, C. F. (1967). Internationalizing Colleges and Universities. International Studies Quarterly, 11 (2), 126- 134.
	Alger, C. F., & Lyons, G. M. (1974). Social science as a transnational system. International Social Science Journal, 26 (1), 137- 149.
	Allardt, E. (1967). Scandinavian sociology. Social Science Information, 6 (4), 223- 246.
	Atal, Y. (1981). The call for indigenization. International social science journal, 33 (1), 189- 197.
	Ayata, S., & Erdemir, A. (2010). Internationalization of social sciences and humanities in Turkey. In Kuhn, M., & Weidemann, D. (Eds. ). Internationalization of the Social Sciences: Asia-Latin America-Middle East-Africa-Eurasia (pp. 265-284). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
	Behrens, J., Fischer, L., Minks, K. H., & Rösler, L. (2010). Die internationale Positionierung der Geisteswissenschaften in Deutschland. Eine empirische Untersuchung. Hannover: HIS.
	Beigel, F. (2016). The politics of academic autonomy in Latin America. London: Routledge.
	Boncourt, T., Holeindre, J. V., Joana, J., & Mayer, N. (2022). Political science communities challenged by internationalisation: The case of France. European Political Science, 21 (4), 610- 626.
	Borghans, L., & Cörvers, F. (2010). The Americanization of European higher education and research. In Charles C. (Ed. ). American Universities in a Global Market (pp. 231-267). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	Burt, R. S., & Burzynska, K. (2017). Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 13 (2), 221- 260.
	Chakkarath, P. (2005). What can Western psychology learn from indigenous psychologies? Lessons from Hindu psychology. In Friedlmeier, W., Chakkarath, P., & Schwarz, B. (Eds. ), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp. 31-51). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
	Chakkarath, P. (2009). Internationalizing education and the social sciences: Reflections on the Indian context. In Kuhn, M., & Weidemann, D. (Eds. ). Internationalization of the Social Sciences: Asia-Latin America-Middle East-Africa-Eurasia (pp. 87-114). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
	Chakkarath, P. (2021). How India almost lost its soul: The detrimental effects of ethnocentrism and colonialism on the psychology of spirituality. In Dueck, A. (Ed. ). Indigenous Psychology of Spirituality: In My Beginning is My End (pp. 227-251). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Christiansen, K. O., Sverre, H., Segerstedt, T. T., & Waris, H. (1955). Introduction. Acta Sociologica, 1 (1), 1- 2.
	Coats, A. W. (Ed. ). (1997). The post-1945 internationalization of economics. Durham: Duke University Press.
	Cohen, B. J. (2007). The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different? Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 197—219.
	Collyer, F., Connell, R., Maia, J. M. E., & Morrell, R. (2018). Knowledge and global power: Making new sciences in the South. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
	Connell, R. (2017). Southern theory and world universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 36 (1), 4- 15.
	Connell, R., Pearse, R., Collyer, F., Maia, J., & Morrell, R. (2018). Re‐making the global economy of knowledge: do new fields of research change the structure of North–South relations? The British journal of sociology, 69(3), 738—757.
	Connell, R. (2019). The Good University: What universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
	Connell, R. (2020). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. London: Routledge.
	Cusset, F. (2008). French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, Jeff Fort (Trans. ). Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
	Crawford, E. (1992). Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880-1939: Four Studies of the Nobel Population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Deng, Z. (2010). Westernization of the Chinese social sciences: The case of legal science (1978–2008). In UNESCO & International Social Science Council (Ed. ). World social science report 2010: Knowledge divides (pp. 182-183). Paris: UNESCO & International Social Science Council.
	Dirlik, A. (2012). Zhongguohua: Worlding China. The case of sociology and anthropology in 20th‐century China. In Dirlik, A., Li, G., & Yen, H. (Eds. ). Sociology and Anthropology in twentieth‐century China: Between universalism and indigenism (pp. 1-39). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
	Dufoix, S. (2021). Under Western eyes? Elements for a transnational and international history of sociology in Asia （1960s–1980s）. Journal of Historical Sociology, 34 (1), 55- 74.
	Fahim, H., & Helmer, K. (1980). Indigenous anthropology in non-Western countries: a further elaboration. Current Anthropology, 21 (5), 644- 663.
	Fleck, C., Duller, M., & Karády, V. (Eds. ). (2018). Shaping Human Science Disciplines: Institutional Developments in Europe and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Fourcade, M. (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American. Journal of Sociology, 112, 145- 194.
	Gewirtz J. (2017). Unlikely partners: Chinese reformers, Western economists, and the making of global China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
	Halsey, A. H. (2004). A history of sociology in Britain: science, literature, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
	Hanafi, S. (2011). University systems in the Arab East: Publish globally and perish locally vs publish locally and perish globally. Current Sociology, 59 (3), 291- 309.
	Heilbron, J., Guilhot, N., & Jeanpierre, L. (2008). Toward a transnational history of the social sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 44, 146- 160.
	Heilbron, J. (2014). The social sciences as an emerging global field. Current Sociology, 62 (5), 685- 703.
	Heilbron, J. (2023). Making sense of globalizing social science. In Fassin, D., & Steinmetz, G. (Eds. ). The Social Sciences in the Looking Glass: Studies in the Production of Knowledge (pp. 262-284). Durham: Duke University Press.
	Heilbron, J., Gustavo S., & Thibaud, B. (Eds. ). (2018). The Social and Human Sciences in Global Power Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
	Hiller, H. H. (1980). Paradigmatic shifts, indigenization, and the development of sociology in Canada. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16 (3), 263- 274.
	Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American journal of sociology, 81 (4), 867- 884.
	Ishikawa, M., & Sun, C. (2016). The paradox of autonomy: Japan’s Vernacular scholarship and the policy pursuit of “Super Global”. Higher Education Policy, 29, 451- 472.
	Ishikawa, M. (2014). Ranking regime and the future of vernacular scholarship. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 30—30.
	Kislenko, I. (2021). Debates on Global Sociology: ‘Unity and Diversity’of Interpretations. The American Sociologist, 52 (3), 579- 590.
	Koch, T., Blanco-Wells, G., & Ayala, R. A. (2021). Scholarly communities at the crossroads: Internationalizing sociological networks in Valparaíso, Chile （2003–2019）. Minerva, 59, 99- 122.
	Korom, P. (2020). The prestige elite in sociology: toward a collective biography of the most cited scholars （1970-2010）. The Sociological Quarterly, 61 (1), 128- 163.
	Kramberger, A., & Mali, F. (2010). An evaluation system of the science and international orientation of social scientists: the case of Slovenia. In Kovács, I. P., & Kutsar, D. (Eds. ). Internationalisation of social sciences in Central and Eastern Europe: the “catching up” - a myth or a strategy? (pp. 192-214). London: Routledge.
	Krause, M. (2016). ‘Western hegemony’ in the social sciences: Fields and model systems. The Sociological Review, 64(2_suppl), 194—211.
	Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T. C., Rozkosz, E. A., Zuccala, A. A. & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(11), 1371—1385.
	Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., & Drabek, A. (2019). Internationalization of polish journals in the social sciences and humanities. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadines de sociologies, 44 (1), 9- 38.
	Kuwayama, T. (2017). Japanese anthropology, neoliberal knowledge structuring, and the rise of audit culture: lessons from the academic world system. Asian Anthropology, 16 (3), 159- 171.
	Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. M. (1997). The exchange of knowledge: A small country in the international research community. Science Communication, 18(3), 238—264.
	Lamy, P. (1976). The globalization of American sociology: excellence or imperialism? The American Sociologist, 104—114.
	Lee, C., & Chen, Y. (2022). In what ways we depend: academic dependency theory and the development of east Asian sociology. Journal of Historical Sociology, 35 (1), 24- 36.
	Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish （in international indexed journals） or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12, 215- 230.
	Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications （1978–2013）. Journal of informetrics, 9 (3), 555- 569.
	Lyons, G. M. (1973). Globalizing the social sciences. PS: Political Science & Politics, 6(1), 6—12.
	Machimura, T. (2010). Doing sociology in native languages in a globalizing world: Thinking about its significance and difficulty in Japan. In Burawoy, M. (Ed. ). Facing an unequal world: Challenges for a global sociology (pp. 201-210). Taiwan: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.
	Mayer, K. U., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Ringen, S. (1985). Editorial Foreword. European Sociological Review, 1 (1), i- ii.
	Medina, L. R. (2013). Centers and Peripheries in Knowledge Production (Vol. 115). New York: Routledge.
	Moore, W. E. (1966). Global sociology: The world as a singular system. American Journal of Sociology, 71 (5), 475- 482.
	Myoung-Kyu, P., & Kyung-Sup, C. (1999). Sociology between western theory and Korean reality: Accommodation, tension and a search for alternatives. International sociology, 14 (2), 139- 156.
	Nederhof, A., Zwaan, R., De Bruin, R., & Dekker, P. J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 15 (5-6), 423- 435.
	Oromaner, M. J. (1970). Comparison of influentials in contemporary American and British sociology: A study in the internationalization of sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 21 (3), 324- 332.
	Ramos Zincke, C. (2014). Local and global communications in Chilean social science: Inequality and relative autonomy. Current Sociology, 62 (5), 704- 722.
	Reid, R., & Traweek, S. (Eds. ). (2013). Doing science+ culture. New York: Routledge.
	Roulleau-Berger, L., Li, P., Kim, S., & Yasawa, S. (2023). Handbook of Post-Western Sociology: From East Asia to Europe. Leiden: Brill.
	Rudolph, S. H. (2005). The imperialism of categories: Situating knowledge in a globalizing world. Perspectives on Politics, 3(1), 5—14.
	Shils, E. (1968). The implantation of universities: reflections on a theme of Ashby. Higher Education Quarterly, 22 (2), 142- 166.
	Shils, E. (2006). A fragment of a sociological autobiography: the history of my pursuit of a few ideas. London and New York: Routledge.
	Shin, J. C., Huang, J. W., Lee, J. K., & An, Y. (2023). Localization of social science research in selected academic disciplines in South Korea. Current Sociology, 71 (5), 762- 779.
	Shin, K. Y. & Han, S. J. (2015). Internationalization of Social Science in South Korea: The Current Status and Challenges. In Kuhn, M., & Weidemann, D. (Eds. ). Internationalization of the Social Sciences: Asia-Latin America-Middle East-Africa-Eurasia (pp. 67-86)–. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
	Singh, Y. (1979). Constraints, Contradictions, and Interdisciplinary Orientations: The Indian Context. International social science journal, 31 (1), 114- 22.
	Sinn, H. W. (2000). Foreword. German Economic Review, 1(1), 1—2.
	Sokolov, M. (2019). The sources of academic localism and globalism in Russian sociology: The choice of professional ideologies and occupational niches among social scientists. Current Sociology, 67(6), 818—837.
	The Times Higher Education. (2009). Most cited authors of books in the humanities, 2007. Available online at www. timeshighereducation. co. uk/story. asp?storyCode=405956&sectioncode=26#leftnavend (accessed June 18, 2010).
	Tierney, R. J., & Kan, W. (2016). Knowledge globalization within and across the People’s Republic of China and the United States: A cross-national study of internationalization of educational research in the early 21st century. American Educational Research Journal, 53 (6), 1759- 1791.
	Turner, B. S. (1990). The two faces of sociology: Global or national? Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2-3), 343—358.
	Vanderstraeten, R. (2010). Scientific communication: Sociology journals and publication practices. Sociology, 44 (3), 559- 576.
	Várnagy, T. (2010). ‘The Americanization of Argentine and Latin American Social Sciences’, In Kuhn, M., & Weidemann, D. (Eds. ). Internationalization of the Social Sciences: Asia-Latin America-Middle East-Africa-Eurasia (pp. 159-173). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
	Von Gizycki, R. (1973). Centre and periphery in the international scientific community: Germany, France and Great Britain in the 19th century. Minerva, 474—494.
	Welz, F. (2009). 100 Years of Indian Sociology. From Social Anthropology to Decentring Global Sociology. International Sociology, 24(5), 1—21.
	Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and Its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science. Sociological Bulletin, 46(1), 21—39.
	Wöhrer, V. (2016). Gender studies as a multi-centred field? Centres and peripheries in academic gender research. Feminist Theory, 17 (3), 323- 343.
	Xie, W. (2012). Foreword. International Journal of Chinese Education, 1 (1), 1- 7.
	Xie, M. (2022). Internationalizing the Social Sciences in China: The Disciplinary Development of Sociology at Tsinghua University. Cham: Springer.
	Xu, X. (2020). China ‘goes out ‘in a centre–periphery world: Incentivizing international publications in the humanities and social sciences. Higher Education, 80 (1), 157- 172.
	Yang, R. (2013). Indigenized while internationalized? Tensions and dilemmas in China’s modern transformation of social sciences in an age of globalisation. In Kuhn, M., & Okamoto, K. (Eds. ). Spatial social thought: Local knowledge in global science encounters (pp. 43-61). Stuttgart: Ibidem Press.
	Yazawa, S. (2014). Internationalization of Japanese sociology. International Sociology, 29 (4), 271- 282.
	Yonezawa, A. (2007). Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads. Higher Education, 54, 483- 499.
	Yan, Y. (1996). The Culture of Guanxi in a North China Village. The China Journal, 35, 1- 25.
	Zhang, L., Shang, Y., Huang, Y., & Sivertsen, G. (2021). Toward internationalization: A bibliometric analysis of the social sciences in Mainland China from 1979 to 2018. Quantitative Science Studies, 2 (1), 376- 408.
	Zhong, W. (1998). Chinese scholars and the world community. In Agelasto, M. & Adamson, B. (Eds. ). Higher education in post-Mao China (pp. 59-77). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
	Zhou, P., Thijs, B., Glänzel, W. (2008). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593—621.
	Zougris, K. (2019). Detecting topical divides and topical “bridges” across national sociologies. The American Sociologist, 50 (1), 63- 84.

作者	国籍	领域	2007年被引次数
米歇尔•福柯（Michel Foucault，1926—1984）	法国	哲学，社会学，批评主义	2521
皮埃尔•布迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu，1930—2002）	法国	社会学	2465
雅克•德里达（Jacques Derrida，1930—2004）	法国	哲学	1874
艾伯特•班杜拉（Albert Bandura，1925—2021）	美国	心理学	1536
安东尼•吉登斯（Anthony Giddens，1938—）	英国	社会学	1303
埃尔文•戈夫曼（Erving Goffman，1922—1982）	美国	社会学	1066
马克斯•韦伯（Max Weber，1864—1920）	德国	社会学	971
朱迪思•巴特勒（Judith Butler，1956—）	美国	哲学	960
布鲁诺•拉图尔（Bruno Latour，1947—2022）	法国	社会学，人类学	944
西格蒙德•弗洛伊德（Sigmund Freud，1856—1939）	奥地利	精神分析学	903
吉尔•德勒兹（Gilles Deleuze，1925—1995）	法国	哲学	897
伊曼努尔•康德（Immanuel Kant，1724—1804）	德国	哲学	882
马丁•海德格尔（Martin Heidegger，1889—1976）	德国	哲学	874
诺姆•乔姆斯基（Noam Chomsky，1928—）	美国	语言学，哲学	812
乌尔里希•贝克（Ulrich Beck，1944—2015）	德国	社会学	733
让•皮亚杰（Jean Piaget，1896—1980）	瑞士	哲学	725
大卫•哈维（David Harvey，1935—）	美国	地理学	723
约翰•罗尔斯（John Rawls，1921—2002）	美国	哲学	708
吉尔特•霍夫斯泰德（Geert Hofstede，1928—2020）	荷兰	文化研究	700
爱德华•赛义德（Edward Said，1935—2003）	美国	批评理论	694

	社会学	经济学	心理学	国际关系
北京大学	62%	70%	48%	39%
清华大学	76%	63%	71%	26%
中国人民大学	45%	41%	28%	36%
复旦大学	56%	55%	47%	42%

[1]	王蓉. 中国社会科学生产方式：来自教育财政领域的观察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(11): 111-126.
[2]	蔡海龙. 法典化背景下教育法学研究方法的反思与重构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(10): 40-51.
[3]	张敏. 哲学社会科学高端人才的素质结构与影响因素研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(5): 41-52.
[4]	侯怀银, 原左晔. 乡村振兴呼唤乡村教育学[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(12): 50-62.
[5]	宣勇, 张鹏. 走出学科危机：教育现代化进程中的大学学科建设[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(3): 48-58.
[6]	祝智庭, BorisWesemann, 闫寒冰, 王诗蓓, 李笑樱, 王巍, RobertA. Sedlák. 国际化人才需求下中国高校毕业生就业能力发展研究——基于在华德企对中国高校毕业生的期望及实现情况调研[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(11): 115-126.
[7]	韩戍. 保守“国学”：光华大学国文系的教学与研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(10): 41-50.
[8]	黄书光. 张瑞璠先生与教育史学科建设[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(1): 146-151+171.
[9]	张斌贤；杜成宪；肖朗；周洪宇；陈露茜；周采. 教育史学科建设六人谈[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2016, 34(4): 1-14.
[10]	杨明全. 超越传统：走向批判与本土化的比较教育学[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(4): 23-29.
[11]	陈光辉. 跨文化心理现象的词源学考证：以欺负现象为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(3): 93-98.
[12]	王灿明顾志燕严奕峰张志泉. 体验学习影响小学生创造性人格发展的实验研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(2): 53-60.
[13]	陈桃兰,田正平. 教育史研究国际化与中国化的早期探索 ——以舒新城为个案的考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(2): 74-79.
[14]	侯怀银, 王晋. 20世纪中国学者对教育社会学学科建设的探索[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2008, 26(3): 1-9.
[15]	阎光才. 话语霸权、强势语言与大学的国际化[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2004, 22(1): 14-20.