华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 117-130.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.06.008

• 科学教育 • 上一篇    

什么才是真实的课堂探究:小学科学探究任务分析

石雨晨1, 唐佳欣2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学课程与教学研究所,上海 200062
    2. 美国犹他大学教育心理系,美国盐湖城 84112
  • 出版日期:2026-06-01 发布日期:2026-05-27

What Constitutes Authentic Classroom Inquiry: An Analysis of Inquiry Tasks in Elementary Science Education

Yuchen Shi1, Jiaxin Tang2   

  1. 1. Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA
  • Online:2026-06-01 Published:2026-05-27

摘要:

“探究实践”是我国中小学科学课程旨在培养的学生核心素养之一,也是近三十年来国内外科学教育重要的育人理念和教学形式。科学教育界倡导在课堂中开展贴近科学家实践的真实探究,但缺少对课堂探究与科学家真实探究之间一致性的实证分析,也并未在“什么是真实的课堂探究”这一关键问题上达成共识。本研究对我国东部某市优质课评选活动中获奖的34节小学科学课视频和教案展开分析,旨在揭示小学科学探究任务是如何在课堂中开展的,并判断这些探究任务是否符合真实探究,最后探讨小学科学课堂需要怎样的真实探究。研究结果表明,90%以上的科学课都包含了至少一项探究任务,平均每节课有一半到三分之二的教学时间用于开展探究,但是绝大部分课堂探究以简单探究为主,主要包括简单实验或简单观察,在认知过程和认识论维度都与科学家的真实探究有着较大差异;课堂探究的开放程度较低,教师在引入和总结阶段都扮演着主导角色,学生极少参与自主探索、协商和辩论等科学实践。小学课堂可能并不具备完全复制科学家真实探究的条件,但教师应平衡探究任务的结构性与开放性,引导学生从认知思维、认识论信念、社会交互等维度模拟科学家所经历的真实探究。

关键词: 科学探究, 探究实践, 科学课堂, 认识论, 话语分析, 课堂论证

Abstract:

“Inquiry Practice” is a core competency targeted in China’s primary and secondary science curricula and has been a key educational concept and instructional approach in science education globally over the past three decades. While there is a strong advocacy for integrating authentic inquiry that mirrors scientific practice into the classroom, empirical analyses on the alignment between classroom inquiry and real scientific inquiry remain scarce, and no consensus has been reached on what constitutes “authentic classroom inquiry.” This study analyzes 34 award-winning elementary science class videos and lesson plans from a city in eastern China to examine how inquiry tasks are implemented in the classroom, assess their authenticity, and discuss what forms of authentic inquiry are needed in elementary science education. Findings reveal that over 90% of the classes included at least one inquiry task, with half to two-thirds of class time on average devoted to inquiry activities. However, most tasks involved simple experiments or observations, differing significantly from authentic scientific inquiry in both cognitive and epistemological dimensions. Classroom inquiry exhibited low openness, with teachers dominating the introduction and conclusion phases, while students rarely engaged in autonomous exploration, negotiation, or argumentation. Although fully replicating scientific inquiry in school settings may not be feasible, teachers should strive to balance structure and openness in inquiry tasks, guiding students to simulate authentic scientific practices through cognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions.

Key words: science inquiry, inquiry practice, science classroom, epistemology, discourse analysis, classroom argumentation