“优绩优酬”:关于西北农村教师绩效工资的实验研究

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.04.013

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 131-141+167.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.04.013

“优绩优酬”:关于西北农村教师绩效工资的实验研究

常芳¹, 党伊玮², 史耀疆¹, 刘承芳³

1. 陕西师范大学教育实验经济研究所, 西安 710116;
2. 澳门科技大学商学院, 澳门 999078;
3. 北京大学现代农学院, 北京 100876

出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-05
基金资助:
高等学校学科创新引智资助计划"西部贫困地区农村人力资本培育智库建设创新引智基地"（B16031）；国家自然科学基金面上项目"西北农村小学教师绩效工资政策的实施及影响研究"（71473240）。

An Experimental Study on Performance Pay of Rural Teachers in Northwest China

CHANG Fang¹, DANG Yiwei², SHI Yaojiang¹, LIU Chengfang³

1. Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710116, China;
2. School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China;
3. School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100876, China

Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 教师是教育的第一资源，如何有效完善教师收入分配激励机制、激发教师工作热情是我国全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的重要方面。本研究利用西北农村地区的216所学校的350名数学老师（第一期237名老师，第二期113名老师）10784名学生样本（第一期7373名六年级学生，第二期3411名五年级学生），对老师进行了基于学生成绩"绝对值""增加值"和"增加值百分位"的绩效激励随机干预实验。研究表明，对老师进行增加值百分位的激励方式能够促使老师改变教学行为，将学生的学业表现分别提高0.10到0.15个标准差，尤其是对学困生学业表现的激励效果更明显。增加值百分位的激励方式有效促使老师同等对待所有学生。据此提出改善义务教育阶段教师绩效工资的具体政策建议，激励老师关注发展起点各不相同的农村孩子，给所有孩子一个公平发展的机会。

关键词: 西北农村, 教师绩效工资, 实验研究

Abstract: Quality compulsory education plays a crucial role in the development of rural areas in China. The key to quality education is to motivate teachers and guarantee their welfare and interests. The study is based on a survey of 216 schools in rural areas, involving 350 math teachers and 10,768 students, to examine the effect of performance incentive on education quality. In a randomized intervention trial, 237 mathematics teachers and 7,357 students in the sixth grade participated in the first investigation, and 113 mathematics teachers and 3,411 students of the fifth grade participated in the second investigation. The findings show that percentile incentives based on increased students' performance help to encourage teachers to improve their teaching performance. Their students' academic performance was increased by 0. 10 to 0. 15 standard devia-tion, and below-average students show remarkable improvement. The results suggest the percentile incentives based on students' academic performance effectively promote performance of all students. Finally, we put for-ward strategies to improve teacher performance by percentile incentives, which is expected to encourage teach-ers to address the learning needs of all students.

Key words: Northwest rural area, performance pay, experimental research

常芳, 党伊玮, 史耀疆, 刘承芳. “优绩优酬”:关于西北农村教师绩效工资的实验研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(4): 131-141+167.

CHANG Fang, DANG Yiwei, SHI Yaojiang, LIU Chengfang. An Experimental Study on Performance Pay of Rural Teachers in Northwest China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(4): 131-141+167.

参考文献

范先佐,付卫东. (2011). 义务教育教师绩效工资改革:背景、成效、问题与对策——基于对中部4省32县(市)的调查. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 50(06), 128-137.
付卫东,崔民初. (2011).义务教育学校教师绩效工资政策分析.现代教育管理, (02),66-70.
付卫东,桂勇. (2010).义务教育学校教师绩效工资政策实施效果的实证研究——基于中部四省部分县(区)的调查分析.上海教育科研, (10), 25-28.
国务院. (2009).政府工作报告.取自:http://www.gov.cn/test/2009-03/16/content_1260221.htm.
胡耀宗,严凌燕.(2017).义务教育教师绩效工资政策执行偏差及其治理——基于沪皖豫三省市教师和校长的抽样调查.教师教育研究, 29(05), 14-18.
教育部. (2008),教育部关于做好义务教育学校教师绩效考核工作的指导意见.取自:http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A04/s7051/200812/t20081231_180682.html.
梁文艳,杜育红. (2011).基于学生学业成绩的教师质量评价——来自中国西部农村小学的证据.北京大学教育评论, 9(03), 105-120+191.
王聪.(2017).绩效工资制度下义务教育教师管理现状与改革突破——基于北京市主要城区调研的思考.中国教育学刊, (05), 30-35.
王善迈,董俊燕,赵佳音.(2013).义务教育县域内校际均衡发展评价指标体系.教育研究, 34(02), 65-69.
叶怀凡.(2016).义务教育教师绩效工资政策的执行偏差与矫正.中国教育学刊, (04), 31-36.
斯托克,沃特森.(2005).经济计量学(王庆石译).东北财经大学出版社.
张林秀.(2013). 随机干预试验——影响评估的前沿方法.地理科学进展, 32(06), 843-851.
中共中央, 国务院.(2018-01-20). 关于全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的意见. 取自新华网:http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-01/31/content_5262659.htm.
中国教育报.(2016).调查显示:电脑辅助学习能显著提高学业表现.取自:http://www.jyb.cn/basc/sd/201606/t20160622_663196.html.
Barlevy, G., & Neal, D. (2012). Pay for percentile. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1805-1831.
Bird, D. O. (2017). Relationship between teacher effectiveness and student achievement:An investigation of teacher quality. Muncie:Ball State University.
Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement:A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46.
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2006). Chapter 61 using randomization in development economics research:A toolkit. Handbook of Development Economics, 4, 3895-3962.
Fryer, R. G. (2013). Teacher incentives and student achievement:Evidence from New York city public schools. Journal of Labor Economics,31(2), 373-407.
Glewwe, P., Ilias, N., & Kremer, M. (2010). Teacher incentives. American Economic Journal:Applied Economics, 2(3), 205-227.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of educational research, 66(3), 361-396.
Hong, S., & Ho, H. Z. (2005). Direct and Indirect Longitudinal Effects of Parental Involvement on Student Achievement:Second-Order Latent Growth Modeling Across Ethnic Groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 32-42.
Lavy, V. (2002). Evaluating the effect of teachers' group performance incentives on pupil achievement. Journal of political Economy, 110(6), 1286-1317.
Lavy, V. (2009). Performance pay and teachers' effort, productivity, and grading ethics. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1979-2011.
Muralidharan, K. (2012). Long-Term Effects of Teacher Performance Pay:Experimental Evidence from India. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.NBER working paper.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237-257.
Peduzzi, P., Henderson, W., Hartigan, P., & Lavori, P. (2002). Analysis of randomized controlled trials. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24(1), 26-38.
Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement:Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252.
Ryan, M. D., & Reid, S. A. (2015). Impact of the flipped classroom on student performance and retention:A parallel controlled study in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 13-23.
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement:Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of personnel evaluation in education, 11(1), 57-67.
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2002). Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials:Chance, not choice. Lancet, 359(9305), 515-519.
Springer, M. G., Hamilton, L., Mccaffrey, D. F., Ballou, D., Le, V. N., & Pepper, M., et al. (2010).Teacher pay for performance:Experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching. National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, Retrieved from:http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/2010/RAND_RP1416.pdf.
Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-country evidence on teacher performance pay. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 404-418.

[1]	顾雪英, 陈华若, 陈实. 生涯教育视角下普通高中选科指导实践模式的建构及检验[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(2): 63-77.
[2]	时晨晨. 美国基础教育项目效果评估经验何在？——基于25项高质量评估研究的主题文本分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(1): 43-59.
[3]	黄忠敬, 吴洁, 高星原. 学生眼中的教育公平是什么?——基于实验研究的证据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(1): 107-115.

“优绩优酬”:关于西北农村教师绩效工资的实验研究

An Experimental Study on Performance Pay of Rural Teachers in Northwest China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价