人文主义与工具理性的张力:国际组织在全球教育治理中的价值导向和政策实践

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.011

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 95-102+168+169.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.011

人文主义与工具理性的张力:国际组织在全球教育治理中的价值导向和政策实践

沈伟

华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所, 上海 200062

出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-22
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金"十二五"规划2013年度教育学青年课题"城镇化进程中区域义务教育质量标准的建构"（CFA130149）。

The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance

SHEN Wei

Institute of International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际组织在全球教育治理中扮着演越来越重要的角色。实现"教育2030"的目标，需澄清主要国际组织参与教育治理的路径、内容与理据。随着国际对话、交流与合作的加强，国际组织表现出多边主义的合作范式，人文主义与工具理性是其运作的内在张力。在参与全球教育治理的过程中，国际组织需提高地方政府的积极性，以系统设计与推进为全球共治的前提，以人的发展为终极目标。

关键词: 国际组织, 全球教育治理, 工具理性, 人文主义

Abstract: International organizations play an increasingly important role in global educational governance. It is necessary to clarify the path, content and rationale some main international organizations take in educational governance to achieve Education 2030. International organizations seem to be multilateral collaboration reinforced by international dialogues, communication and cooperation. And there is always the tension between humanism and instrumental rationality in its operation. Thus, in global educational governance, international organizations should be based on systemic design and implementation, and motivate local government to promote human development.

Key words: international organization, global governance in education, instrumental rationality, humanism

沈伟. 人文主义与工具理性的张力:国际组织在全球教育治理中的价值导向和政策实践[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(1): 95-102+168+169.

SHEN Wei. The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(1): 95-102+168+169.

参考文献

《教育2030行动框架》起草委员会.(2016). 迈向全纳、公平、有质量的教育和全民终身学习——《教育2030行动框架》之实施方式(熊建辉,臧日霞,杜晓敏译). 世界教育信息. (4),16-24.
联合国教科文组织.(2005). 全民教育:提高质量势在必行. 巴黎:联合国教育科学及文化组织出版.
联合国教科文组织.(2015). 反思教育:向"全球共同利益"的理念转变? 巴黎:联合国教育科学及文化组织出版.
联合国教科文组织.(2016). 迈向全纳、公平、有质量的教育和全民终身学习——《教育2030行动框架》之前言、愿景、理念与原则(国家教育发展研究中心专题组译). 世界教育信息,(1),7-11.
森.(2002).以自由看待发展(任赜,于真译). 北京:中国人民大学出版社.
Alexander, N.(2001). Paying for education:How the World Bank and the international Monetary Fund influence education in developing countries. Peabody Journal of Education, (76), 285-338.
Bonal, X. (2004). Is the World Bank education policy adequate for fighting poverty? Some evidence from Latin American. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 649-666.
Brock-Utne, B. (2000).Whose education for all? The recolonization of the African mind. New York:Falmer Press.
Mundy, K., 2007. Education for all:Paradoxes and prospects of a global promise. In David, B. & Alexander, W. Education for all:Global promises, National challenges. Amsterdam. et.al:Elsevier JAI.
Elfert, M. (2015). Unesco, the Faure report, the Delors report, and the political utopia of lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 88-100.
Heyneman,S. P.(2003). Education, Social cohesion, And the future role of international organization. Peabody Journal of Education. 78(3), 25-38.
OECD.(2005). Progress and output results of the programme of work 2002 to 2006, Meeting of OECD education Chief Executives. September 23, Copenhagen.
UN.(2015). Goal4:Ensure inclusive and quality education for all and promote lifelong learning. Retrieved from:http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/
The World Bank Group. (2015). Public opinion research group. Retrieved from:http://countrysurveys.worldbank.org.
World Bank. (2002).Achieving education for all by 2015:Simulation results for 47 low income countries. Washington, DC:World Bank.

[1]	刘骥, 张晋. 国际学生评估项目（PISA）衍生品：全球教育治理的功利化挑战[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(2): 53-62.
[2]	戴维·埃乔莱纳, 张丹. 质量与公平:联合国教科文组织全球教育治理目标与路径——戴维·埃乔莱纳与张丹的对话[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(2): 139-147+159.

人文主义与工具理性的张力:国际组织在全球教育治理中的价值导向和政策实践

The Tension between Humanism and Instrumental Rationality: Value Orientation and Policy Practice of International Organization in Global Educational Governance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价