科学教育中科学家的角色与功能

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.08.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

部分科学家参与科学教育的专业实践以及与此相关的研究，是发展高质量科学教育的关键要素。科学家为何以及应该如何深度参与到其他专业群体之中，即科学教育中科学家的角色定位和功能发挥问题，尚缺乏适当的分析框架。互动型专长这一概念框架，强调科学研究中的默会规范，以及外行沉浸于科学研究活动与科学群体之中的重要性，适用于分析当前科学教育如何实现实践转向。当下的科学实践存在着社会?认知上的层级迁移、更强的默会程度和交叉性等特征，科学发展的动态性和科学探索的复杂性给科学教育变革带来了新挑战。科学教育在将科学认知实践的真实过程、与认知实践相关的社会维度等转化为教育资源时，衔接不足。通过参与校内外科学教育，科学家能够促进科学外行的互动型专长，自身也能获得一定的社会?认知受益。科学家深度参与科学教育有多重角色，是促进学生参与和理解真实的科学认知实践的衔接者和资源提供者、科学教育领域的合作研究者。通过传递真实的科学研究过程、澄清学科交叉中的多重概念与推理、促进理解科学模型、促进有科学证据的科学教育研究，科学家能够发挥的功能可以是：提升课程质量、影响教学实践、提升基础教育科学教师的培养层次，助力学生成为认知实践的主体，培养科技人才、促进有科学证据的科学教育。

关键词: 科学教育, 科学家, 交叉科学, 互动型专长, 默会知识, 科学教师

Abstract:

It is an increasing discourse that scientists should engage in professional science education addressing the general public both in formal and informal education settings. However, we lack well-developed frameworks to analyze how (some) scientists engage in science education and what roles their engagement plays in scientific and other communities. Based on the framework of acquiring interactional expertise, this paper analyses the varied expertise levels, tacit norms and interdisciplinarity for doing and understanding contemporary science challenges in science education. It is difficult for science teachers to represent the real epistemic practice of the whole scientific process in science education settings and learning environments, and then to promote the learners to reflectively participate in epistemic practice. Building on the work of interactional expertise, this paper discusses why some scientists should engage in the practice and research on science education, how they engage, and the socio-epistemic benefits for engagement. It then concludes scientists’ roles and functions in science education.

Key words: science education, scientists, interdisciplinary sciences, interactional expertise, tacit knowledge, science teachers

朱晶, 姜雪峰. 科学教育中科学家的角色与功能[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(8): 50-63.

Jing Zhu, Xuefeng Jiang. The Roles and Functions of Scientists Engaging in Science Education[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(8): 50-63.

参考文献 0

	裴新宁, 郑太年. 国际科学教育发展的对比研究——理念、主题与实践的革新中国科学院院刊 2021 36 7 771 778 裴新宁, 郑太年. (2021). 国际科学教育发展的对比研究——理念、主题与实践的革新. 中国科学院院刊,36(7),771—778.
	孙慧芳, 王钦忠, 黄瑄, 周玉芝. 小学科学教师队伍专业发展现状及提升策略——基于对北京市2222名小学科学教师的调研分析中小学管理 2023 06 34 37 孙慧芳, 王钦忠, 黄瑄, 周玉芝. (2023). 小学科学教师队伍专业发展现状及提升策略——基于对北京市2222名小学科学教师的调研分析. 中小学管理,06,34—37.
	杨玉良. 构建中国特色世界水平的科学教育体系中国教育学刊 2022 10 卷首语杨玉良. (2022). 构建中国特色世界水平的科学教育体系. 中国教育学刊, 10, 卷首语.
	郁振华. 论三种智慧华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 2020 52 05 53 67 郁振华. (2020). 论三种智慧. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 52(05), 53—67.
	袁振国. 教育数字化转型: 转什么, 怎么转华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2023 41 03 1 11 袁振国. (2023). 教育数字化转型: 转什么, 怎么转. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41(03), 1—11.
	郑永和, 杨宣洋, 袁正, 卢阳旭. 高质量科学教育体系: 内涵和框架中国教育学刊 2022 10 12 18 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 袁正, 卢阳旭. (2022). 高质量科学教育体系: 内涵和框架. 中国教育学刊,10,12—18.
	郑永和, 杨宣洋, 王晶莹, 李佳, 卢阳旭, 李书惠, 杨玉静, 张晓琳. 我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议: 基于31个省份的大规模调研华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) 2023 41 04 1 21 郑永和, 杨宣洋, 王晶莹, 李佳, 卢阳旭, 李书惠, 杨玉静, 张晓琳. (2023). 我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议: 基于31个省份的大规模调研. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),41(04),1—21.
	朱晶, 姜雪峰. 跨越认知价值鸿沟——交叉科学何以深度交叉探索与争鸣 2023a 02 45 54 朱晶, 姜雪峰. (2023a). 跨越认知价值鸿沟——交叉科学何以深度交叉. 探索与争鸣,02,45—54.
	朱晶, 姜雪峰. 合成化学中的逻辑推演理论: 科里的逆向思维与计算机辅助化学教育 2023b 44 14 1 6 朱晶, 姜雪峰. (2023b). 合成化学中的逻辑推演理论: 科里的逆向思维与计算机辅助. 化学教育,44(14),1—6.
	Alberts, B. (2022). Why science education is more important than most scientists think. FEBS Letters. 596(2), 149—159.
	Atias, O., Kali, Y., Shavit, A., & Baram-Tsabari, A. Meaningful participation of schools in scientific research through contributory citizen science projects Science Education 2023 107 5 1163 1192 Atias, O., Kali, Y., Shavit, A., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2023). Meaningful participation of schools in scientific research through contributory citizen science projects. Science Education, 107(5), 1163—1192.
	Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2016 53 7 1082 1112 Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082—1112.
	Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond discipline-based education research Science Advances 2019 5 eaav6403 Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2019). Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond discipline-based education research. Science Advances, 5, eaav6403.
	Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. Disciplinary bias, money matters, and persistence: Deans’ perspectives on science faculty with education specialties (SFES) CBE-Life Science Education 2020 19 3 1 13 Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2020). Disciplinary bias, money matters, and persistence: Deans’ perspectives on science faculty with education specialties (SFES). CBE-Life Science Education, 19(3), 1—13.
	Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. Building cognition: The construction of computational representations for scientific discovery Cognitive Science 2014 39 8 1727 1763 Chandrasekharan, S., & Nersessian, N. J. (2014). Building cognition: The construction of computational representations for scientific discovery. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1727—1763.
	Collins, H. , & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
	Collins, H., & Evans, R. Expertise revisited, part I—Interactional expertise Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2015 54 113 123 Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2015). Expertise revisited, part I—Interactional expertise. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54, 113—123.
	Dance, A. A passion for pedagogy Nature 2023 613 7942 203 205 Dance, A. (2023). A passion for pedagogy. Nature, 613(7942), 203—205.
	de Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 27.
	Denning, P. J. , & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
	Donovan, M. S. Generating improvement through research and development in education systems Science 2013 340 6130 317 319 Donovan, M. S. (2013). Generating improvement through research and development in education systems. Science, 340(6130), 317—319.
	Eidin, E, Bielik, T, Touitou, I, Bowers, J, McIntyre, C, Damelin, D, & Krajcik, J. Thinking in terms of change over time: Opportunities and challenges of using system dynamics models Journal of Science Education and Technology 2024 33 1 1 28 Eidin, E, Bielik, T, Touitou, I, Bowers, J, McIntyre, C, Damelin, D, & Krajcik, J. (2024). Thinking in terms of change over time: Opportunities and challenges of using system dynamics models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 1—28.
	Ferreira, L. M, Weiss, J. P., & Lambach, M. Disparities and conceptual connections regarding the concept of substance in general chemistry textbook glossaries Foundations of Chemistry 2022 24 2 171 187 Ferreira, L. M, Weiss, J. P., & Lambach, M. (2022). Disparities and conceptual connections regarding the concept of substance in general chemistry textbook glossaries. Foundations of Chemistry, 24(2), 171—187.
	llchin, D., & Zemplen, G. A. Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science Science Education 2020 104 5 907 933 llchin, D., & Zemplen, G. A. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104(5), 907—933.
	Jacobson, W., & Cole, R. Motivations and obstacles influencing faculty engagement in adopting teaching innovations To Improve the Academy:A Journal of Educational Development 2020 39 1 137 159 Jacobson, W., & Cole, R. (2020). Motivations and obstacles influencing faculty engagement in adopting teaching innovations. To Improve the Academy:A Journal of Educational Development, 39(1), 137—159.
	Lau, M., & Sikorski, T-R. Dimensions of Science promoted in museum experiences for teachers Journal of Science Teacher Education 2018 29 7 578 599 Lau, M., & Sikorski, T-R. (2018). Dimensions of Science promoted in museum experiences for teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 578—599.
	Lieber, L. S., Ilbraj, K., Caspari-Gnann, I., & Graulich, N. Closing the gap of organic chemistry students’ performance with an adaptive scaffold for argumentation patterns Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2022 23 811 828 Lieber, L. S., Ilbraj, K., Caspari-Gnann, I., & Graulich, N. (2022). Closing the gap of organic chemistry students’ performance with an adaptive scaffold for argumentation patterns. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23, 811—828.
	Love, A. C. Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo Science & Education 2013 22 2 255 278 Love, A. C. (2013). Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo. Science & Education, 22(2), 255—278.
	Maass, K., Zehetmeier, S., Weihberger, A., & Flosser, K. Analysing mathematical modelling tasks in light of citizenship education using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study ZDM-Mathematics Education 2023 55 1 133 145 Maass, K., Zehetmeier, S., Weihberger, A., & Flosser, K. (2023). Analysing mathematical modelling tasks in light of citizenship education using the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 55(1), 133—145.
	Manz, E., & Georgen, C. Interlocking models in classroom science Science & Education 2023 107 6 1399 1434 Manz, E., & Georgen, C. (2023). Interlocking models in classroom science. Science & Education, 107(6), 1399—1434.
	Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D. & Berland, L. Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2018 55 7 1053 1075 Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D. & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053—1075.
	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Science and Engineering in Preschool Through Elementary Grades: The Brilliance of Children and the Strengths of Educators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Call to Action for Science Education: Building Opportunity for the Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
	Nersessian, N. (2022). Interdisciplinarity in the Making: Models and Methods in Frontier Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
	Oreskes, N. (2021). Why Trust Science? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
	Plaisance, K. S. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2020 83 53 62 Plaisance, K. S. (2020). The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 83, 53—62.
	Price, J. The landing zone——Ground for model transfer in chemistry Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2019 77 21 28 Price, J. (2019). The landing zone——Ground for model transfer in chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 77, 21—28.
	Ramberg, P. J. What is an element? A collection of essays by chemists, philosophers, historians, and educators Foundations of Chemistry 2021 23 3 465 473 Ramberg, P. J. (2021). What is an element? A collection of essays by chemists, philosophers, historians, and educators. Foundations of Chemistry, 23(3), 465—473.
	Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. Learning evolution by collaboration Bioscience 2021 71 10 1091 1102 Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2021). Learning evolution by collaboration. Bioscience, 71(10), 1091—1102.
	Slater, L. Instruments and rules: R.B. Woodward and the tools of Twentieth-Century organic chemistry Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2002 33 1 33 Slater, L. (2002). Instruments and rules: R.B. Woodward and the tools of Twentieth-Century organic chemistry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 1—33.
	Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions Science 2009 323 122 124 Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122—124.
	Wieman, C. (2017). Improving How Universities Teach Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[1]	郑永和, 杨宣洋, 王晶莹, 李佳, 卢阳旭, 李书惠, 杨玉静, 张晓琳. 我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议：基于31个省份的大规模调研[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(4): 1-21.
[2]	张博, 董瑞海. 自然语言处理技术赋能教育智能发展——人工智能科学家的视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(9): 19-31.
[3]	朱晶. 科学教育中的知识、方法与信念——基于科学哲学的考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 106-116.
[4]	徐金雷. 技术的默会知识及其实践培育[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(6): 19-28+154.
[5]	裴新宁, 刘新阳. 初中课堂科学探究中究竟发生了什么——基于多案例的实证考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(4): 107-121+165+166.
[6]	崔鸿, 朱家华, 张秀红. 基于项目的STEAM学习探析:核心素养的视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 54-61+135+136.
[7]	彭正梅. 理性的狡计：德国教育学发展中的五次危机及其因应[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2009, 27(4): 16-23.
[8]	胡卫平. 科学教育的研究趋势与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 25(4): 44-51.
[9]	李同吉, 吴庆麟. 论解决结构不良问题的能力及其培养[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(1): 63-68, 75.
[10]	王伦信. 五四新文化运动时期我国学校科学教育的境况与改革使命——推士《中国之科学与教育》述评[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2005, 23(1): 85-92.