华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 16-30.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2026.05.002

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

马克思主义人学理论视域下劳动教育本体价值的审思

王红, 向艳   

  1. 华南师范大学教师教育学部,广州 510631
  • 接受日期:2026-01-05 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-04-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学重大课题“新时代高质量教师教育体系建设及师资供需配给研究”(VFA220007)。

Critical Reflection on the Ontological Value of Labor Education from the Perspective of Marxist Theory of Human Science

Hong Wang, Yan Xiang   

  1. Faculty of Teacher Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
  • Accepted:2026-01-05 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-04-27

摘要:

劳动作为人区别于动物的本质性存在方式,是马克思主义人学理论的核心命题。立足该理论视角审视劳动教育“价值异化”的现实困境,厘清劳动、劳动教育及其本体价值的内在关联,从马克思主义关于“人的本质”“人的需要”“人的价值”“人的发展”的核心思想出发,提出劳动教育本身所应追求的人本属性、价值属性、需求属性和发展属性,给当代劳动教育“以劳育劳(人)”的本体价值回归提供了一个参照系。实现劳动教育本体价值需以马克思主义人学理论为统摄性基石,推动劳动教育从工具性手段向“人的类本质”确证路径的目标理念重塑;确立劳动教育“本体价值”对其“工具价值”的优先性原则,纠正将劳动教育简化为其他几育附庸的实践偏差;明晰劳动教育从满足“育才的需要”转向“育人的需要”的内容边界。从此三方面协同推进,方能在劳动教育实践中完成对人的本质力量的现实确证,最终实现劳动教育“以人之本质培育时代新人”的逻辑旨归。

关键词: 劳动教育, 马克思主义, 人学理论, 本体价值

Abstract:

Labor, as the essential mode of existence distinguishing humans from animals, constitutes the core proposition of Marxist humanistic theory. Examining the practical dilemma of “value alienation” in labor education from this theoretical perspective, and clarifying the intrinsic connections between labor, labor education, and its ontological value, this paper draws upon core Marxist concepts concerning “human essence” “human needs” “human value” and “human development”. It proposes the inherent characteristics labor education itself should pursue—namely, its humanistic attribute, value attribute, need attribute, and developmental attribute—thus providing a frame of reference for the return of contemporary labor education to its ontological value of “cultivating human beings through labor”. Realizing the ontological value of labor education requires using Marxist humanistic theory as the overarching foundation. This necessitates driving a transformation in the goals and philosophy of labor education—shifting it from an instrumental means towards a path confirming “the species-being of humans.” It demands establishing the primacy of labor education’s “ontological value” over its “instrumental value,” thereby correcting the practical deviation of simplifying labor education into an appendage of other forms of education. Furthermore, it requires clarifying the content boundaries, shifting labor education from satisfying the “need for cultivating talents” to the “need for cultivating human beings.” Only through the coordinated advancement of these three aspects can labor education, in practice, achieve the real confirmation of human essential powers, ultimately fulfilling its logical aim: cultivating a new generation for the times through the essence of humanity.

Key words: labor education, Marxism, human science theory, ontological value