教学领导的概念创生与理论演进——基于菲利普·海林杰教授访谈的叙事与思考

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 教学领导是教育领导领域十分重要且经典的理论模型，自上世纪80年代被提出以后，至今仍对理论和实践具有重要的影响力。本世纪以来，伴随“为学习的领导”研究热潮的兴起，教学领导理论再次得到关注。基于对教学领导理论和工具的主要创立者—菲利普·海林杰（Philip Hallinger）教授的专题访问，文章从亲历者和见证人的视角还原了这个标志性教育领导理论创生的历史过程，呈现了其在竞争性领导理论、多元文化情境以及不断升级的教育改革实践所编织的复杂背景中起落沉浮、渐进演化的脉络图景。文章最后着眼于教育领导研究日趋多元的发展格局，对本领域研究从哪里来、到哪里去的根本性议题进行了反思与展望。

关键词: 教学领导, 教育领导, 教育管理, 为学习的领导

Abstract: Instructional leadership (IL) is considered to be one of those key concepts and classic theoretical models in the field of educational leadership studies. For about forty years since it was launched in the middle of 1980s, this concept and model has guided researchers and even practitioners in their work all around the globe. The authors of this article recently conducted a thematic interview with Philip Hallinger, one of the founding scholars who first developed a clear conceptualization of instructional leadership, and made it possible to look at the process of the development and change of this concept and theory from his own perspective. Besides, this article tries to picture the dynamics of how IL corresponded to challenging leadership concepts, diverse cultural contexts as well as shifting educational reforms and eventually developed into a helpful organizing concept up till now. It concludes with reflections on some key issues concerning the themes, perspectives and interests for knowledge building in this field, discussing matters of historical roots and the future ahead for leadership study in education.

Key words: instructional leadership, educational leadership, educational administration, leadership for learning

董辉, 李路路, 张婕. 教学领导的概念创生与理论演进——基于菲利普·海林杰教授访谈的叙事与思考[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 87-96.

Dong Hui, Li Lulu, Zhang Jie. The Conceptualization and Model Building of Instructional Leadership: Based on the Interview with Philip Hallinger[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 87-96.

参考文献

Bridges，E.M. （1967）. Instructional leadership：a concept re-examined. Journal of Educational Administration，5（2），136-147.
Cuban, L. （1988）. The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dimmock, C. ,& Walker, A. (2005). Educational Leadership: Culture and Diversity. London: Sage.
Dwyer，D. C. （1984）. The search for instructional leadership：routines and subtleties in the principal’s role. Educational Leadership， 41（5），32-37.
Edmonds，R. （1979）. Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership，37（1）.
English, F. W. (2008). The Art of Educational Leadership: Balancing performance and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fullan, M. (2010). All Systems Go: The Change Imperative for Whole System Reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Grint, K. (2010). Leadership: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hallinger, P. ,& Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-248
Hallinger, P. ,& Murphy, J. (1986). Instructional leadership. The Effective School Report, 4(5), 2-5
Hallinger, P., & Richardson, D. (1988). Models of shared leadership: Evolving Structures and relationships. The Urban Review, 20(4), 229-245
Hallinger, P. (1982/1990/2015). Principal Instructional Management Rating scale. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University.
Hallinger, P. (2003a). Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Hallinger, P. (2003b). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-351
Hallinger, P. (2010). Developing instructional leadership. In B. Davies and M. Brundrett (Eds.), Developing successful leadership (pp. 61-77). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142
Hallinger, P. (2018). A systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in south Africa: mapping knowledge production in a developing society. International Journal of Leadership in Education, (3), 1-19
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: What makes a difference? Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2009). In A Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110
Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2017). Leading learning in Asia: Emerging empirical insights from five societies. Journal of Educational Administration, 5(2), 130-146
Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (2007). Educational Administration Theory, Research, and Practice(8^th edition). McGraw-Hill
Leithwood，K.，Patten，S.，& Jantzi，D.. （2010）. Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly， 46（5），671-706.
Palmer, P. (1993). To Know As We Are Known: Education As A Spiritual Journey. San Francisco: Harper One.
Robinson，V. M. J.，Lloyd，C. A.，& Rowe，K. J.. （2008）. The impact of leadership on student outcomes：an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly， 44（5），635-674.
Townsend, T. (2016). Leading Schools in the twenty-first century: careful driving in the fast lane. In G. Johnson, N. Dempster(eds.), Leadership in Diverse Leaning Context, Switzerland: Springer.
Walker, A. ,& Hallinger, P. (2007). Navigating culture and context: the principalship in East and Southeast Asia. In R. MacLean (Ed.), Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century: Papers in honor of Professor Phillip Hughes. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Walker, A., & Hallinger, P. (2016). School Leadership for Learning and Change: Progress of an Asian Agenda. In G. Johnson, N. Dempster (eds.), Leadership in Diverse Learning Contexts(pp. 145-171), Switzerland: Springer.
Walker, A. , & Hallinger, P. (2013). Global trends in the preparation of school leaders. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 41(4), 401-404
冯大鸣.(2002). 沟通与分享: 中西教育管理领衔学者世纪汇谈. 上海教育出版社.
冯大鸣. (2012). 西方教学领导研究的再度兴盛及逻辑转向. 教育研究,(3),135-139
张新平, 赵越. (2018). 重思教学领导. 教育发展研究,(18),31-36
郑鑫, 尹弘飚. (2014). 教学领导的再度兴盛?——兼论西方教育领导研究的转向. 比较教育研究,(10),21-25

[1]	柏宏权, 王姣阳, 沈书生. 区域教育管理者对在线教学融入常态教学的意愿及其影响因素研究——江苏省中小学在线教学调查研究报告之五[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(4): 77-89.
[2]	赵晓伟, 邵宏宇, 沈书生. 从应对危机到适应变化：不同类型校长在线教学领导行为特征分析——江苏省中小学在线教学调查研究报告之四[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(4): 61-76.
[3]	褚宏启. 中国教育发展方式的转变:路径选择与内生发展[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(1): 1-14+159.
[4]	胡中锋,王义宁. 教育领导力模式变迁之反思[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(3): 7-13.
[5]	许国动,胡中锋. 系统视阈下教育领导力研究领域、体系与范式构建[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(4): 11-17.
[6]	郅庭瑾. 教育管理制度伦理问题研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(4): 32-37.
[7]	郅庭瑾. 教育管理伦理:一个新的研究领域[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2005, 23(3): 38-42, 73.
[8]	安格斯劳伦斯. 教育政策、教育管理与文化分析——社会学传统的重要性[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2004, 22(3): 31-43.
[9]	张新平. 外国教育管理学理论发展5 0年[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2003, 21(4): 9-16.
[10]	张新平. 反思与建构:教育管理现象及相关问题研究*[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2002, 20(2): 6-16,41.
[11]	吴志宏. 探讨新世纪教育管理学研究的走向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2002, 20(2): 1-5.
[12]	黄崴. 20世纪西方教育管理理论及其模式的发展[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2001, 19(1): 19-28.