华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 99-115.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.10.007

• 高等教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

不学而有术:研究型大学文科学生的读书法

林小英, 王潇语   

  1. 北京大学教育经济研究所/教育学院,北京 100871
  • 出版日期:2025-10-01 发布日期:2025-10-09
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划项目国家一般课题“教育数字化转型中大学生学习新样态研究”(BIA240133)。

The Algorithmic Knowing Mode of “Knowing-without-Studying”: The “Way of Reading” of Students Majoring in Humanities and Social Sciences in Research Universities

Xiaoying Lin, Xiaoyu Wang   

  1. Institute of Economics of Education/Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100872, China
  • Online:2025-10-01 Published:2025-10-09

摘要:

“读书”是研究型大学人文社科专业学生的日常学习活动,旨在使学生获得学科知识并养成深入思考的求知习惯,然而不少学生有自己的一套可谓“不学而有术”的学习策略。通过访谈和课堂观察,本研究搜集了北京大学某些人文社科专业学生撰写读书报告和做课堂汇报的相关资料,发现“不学而有术”的普遍性读书行为是在社会加速的前提下,审计文化对“可表现能力”和“可迁移能力”的要求与“算法型致知模式”共同催生的结果。长期采用算法型致知的阅读模式将使学生无法深入知识系统的内部,难以在阅读的过程中自然形成文科专业最看重的理解力和判断力,反而容易沦为技术时代承载着某种算法的“工具人”。学生们利用算法所省去的工夫正是文科教育所追求的启迪心智、涵养心性的核心价值,这是当下研究型大学人才培养的一个危机。

关键词: 算法型致知, 研究型大学, 人文社科, 大学生学习, 读书

Abstract:

“Reading” is a routine academic activity for students majoring in humanities and social sciences in research universities, aiming at acquiring disciplinary knowledge and cultivating the habit of deep thinking. However, in practice, many students possess their own set of “clever reading methods” that can be described as “knowing-without-studying.” This research utilizing qualitative research tools such as interviews and participatory observation examines the reading behaviors of students in the humanities and social sciences at Peking University. It reveals that behind the students’ technicalized learning behaviors lies the demand for “performable abilities” from the audit culture, the demand for “transferable abilities” from the “accelerated society,” and the algorithmic thinking patterns fostered by the computer age. Long-term adoption of “clever reading methods” will prevent students from delving into the texture and interior of knowledge, making it difficult for them to form the crucial comprehension and judgment in the humanities and social sciences. In the process of technicalized learning, they become “tools” carrying a certain algorithm in the technological age. However, the effort saved by their technicalized learning is precisely the core value of humanities and social sciences education. This approach dissolves the educational value of enlightening the mind, which is one of the crises in talent cultivation in contemporary research universities.

Key words: algorithmic knowing, research university, humanities and social sciences, college student learning, literature reading.