效率还是价值：高校教师评价制度的逻辑困境及其张力调适

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.06.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近些年来盛行的国内高校教师评价活动，科研导向、定量方式、绩效至上始终占据着主导地位，反映出只重事实层面的合理性而轻价值层面正当性的现象。高校教师评价取向与标准主要非来自理论逻辑的自洽，而是现实中外部力量对高校学术生态的强力介入及其与高校博弈的结果，进而形塑了教师的工作生活方式以及学术信念与行动偏好。因此，从价值层面对时下评价制度的结果逻辑、计数逻辑与绩效逻辑予以全面检思，继而调适教师评价目的性与工具性价值间的张力尤为必要。

关键词: 高校教师, 教师评价, 评价制度, 组织变革, 教师行为

Abstract:

In recent years, the prevalent evaluation activities in university faculties have always been dominated by scientific research orientation, quantitative method, and performance orientation, reflecting the phenomenon that only emphasizes the rationalities at the factual level and ignores the legitimacy at the value level. The evaluation orientation and standards of university faculties are not mainly derived from the self-consistent theoretical logic, but from the strong interventions of external forces in the academic ecology of universities and the results of competitions among universities in reality, which in turn shapes faculties work life styles, academic beliefs, and action preferences. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively reflect on the result logic, counting logic, and performance logic of the current evaluation system at the value level, so as to adjust the tension between the purpose value and instrumental value of faculty evaluation.

Key words: university faculties, faculty evaluation, evaluation system, organizational reform, teacher behavior

苏强, 蔡晓卫. 效率还是价值：高校教师评价制度的逻辑困境及其张力调适[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(6): 133-141.

Qiang Su, Xiaowei Cai. Efficiency or Value: Logic Dilemmas and Tension Adjustments of University Faculty Evaluation System[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(6): 133-141.

参考文献 0

	操太圣 “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向大学教育科学 2019 1 27 32 操太圣. (2019). “五唯”问题: 高校教师评价的后果、根源及解困路向. 大学教育科学,(1),27—32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2019.01.005
	董彦邦, 刘莉高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?——基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查复旦教育论坛 2021 19 5 105 112 董彦邦, 刘莉. (2021). 高校医学院本部教师最认同什么样的科研评价制度?—基于对我国18所高校医学院本部教师的调查. 复旦教育论坛,19(5),105—112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2021.05.016
	赖鼎铭量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例图书馆学与资讯科学 2005 31 1 14 33 赖鼎铭. (2005). 量化指标并非学术评鉴的万灵丹: 以国外几种代表性的学术评鉴为例. 图书馆学与资讯科学,31(1),14—33.
	李文平大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析高校教育管理 2017 3 95 104 李文平. (2017). 大学教师对教师评价制度的满意度调查分析. 高校教育管理,(3),95—104. doi: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20170427.013
	刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究——基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查清华大学教育研究 2020 41 4 73 82 刘莉, 朱莉, 刘念才. (2020). 目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究—基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查. 清华大学教育研究,41(4),73—82. doi: 10.14138/j.1001-4519.2020.02.007310
	秦琳. (2019-10-24). 如何破解高校“唯论文”顽疾. 光明日报, (14).
	苏锦丽, 黄曙东美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨教育政策论坛 2009 2 1 44 苏锦丽, 黄曙东. (2009). 美国大学教师评鉴制度之探讨. 教育政策论坛,(2),1—44.
	习近平. (2020). 习近平谈治国理政. 北京: 外文出版社.
	阎光才, 岳英高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性——以经济学领域为个案的实证研究教育研究 2012 10 75 83 阎光才, 岳英. (2012). 高校学术评价过程中的认可机制及其合理性—以经济学领域为个案的实证研究. 教育研究,(10),75—83.
	阎光才高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析中国高教研究 2018 11 22 27 阎光才. (2018). 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析. 中国高教研究,(11),22—27. doi: 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2018.11.05
	Amaranti, M Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria Congreso Universidad 2017 6 1 91 114 Amaranti, M. (2017). Uso de Resultados de la Evaluación Docente para Mejorar la Calidad de la Docencia Universitaria. Congreso Universidad, 6(1), 91—114.
	Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
	Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance Studies in Higher Education 2021 46 11 2134 2151 Erickson, M., Hanna, P., & Walker, C. (2021). The UK Higher Education Senior Management Survey: A Statactivist Response to Managerialist Governance. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2134—2151. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693
	Hill, H. C Fixing Teacher Professional Development Phi Delta Kappan 2009 90 7 470 477 Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing Teacher Professional Development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470—477. doi: 10.1177/003172170909000705
	Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2006 31 3 267 286 Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267—286. doi: 10.1080/02602930500352816
	Laudel, G., & Glaser, J Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2006 28 3 289 295 Laudel, G., & Glaser, J. (2006). Tensions Between Evaluations and Communications Practices. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 289—295. doi: 10.1080/13600800600980130
	Lu, H., & Zhang, X. R. (2021). Emotional Responses Toward a New Research Policy Among Academics in a Chinese University. Front Psychol, 12(11).
	Meng, Q., & Wang, G A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal 2018 11 597 605 Meng, Q., & Wang, G. (2018). A Research on Sources of University Faculty Occupational Stress: A Chinese Case Study. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management Journal, 11, 597—605.
	Prodegers, S. B Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation Regional Spotlight 1980 13 2 1 19 Prodegers, S. B. (1980). Toward Systematic Faculty Evaluation. Regional Spotlight, 13(2), 1—19.
	Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions Journal of Education for Business 2009 84 3 169 176 Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2009). The Effect of Different Teaching, Research, and Service Emphases on Individual and Organizational Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 169—176. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.3.169-176

[1]	赵平, 胡咏梅. 中国高校教师基本工资制度的现状、问题与对策——基于保障性功能与激励性功能的视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(1): 41-57.
[2]	胡咏梅, 赵平, 元静. 理想与现实：我国高校教师工资水平与结构分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(1): 24-40.
[3]	余胜泉. 教育数字化转型的关键路径[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(3): 62-71.
[4]	雷万鹏, 马红梅, 黄华明. 基于学生成绩残差分解技术的教师教学质量评价[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 84-91.
[5]	郑宏, 谢作栩, 王婧. 后疫情时代高校教师在线教学态度的调查研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(7): 54-64.
[6]	阮成武. 高校教师职业生涯发展的场域转换及惯习重构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(5): 128-135.
[7]	李永鑫, 赵剑. 进化:组织行为学研究的新视角[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2009, 27(1): 56-62.
[8]	申继亮, 孙炳海. 教师评价内容体系之重建[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2008, 26(2): 38-43.
[9]	张积家. 小学生对不同语言形式教师评价的认知和偏好[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 25(4): 61-66.
[10]	李春玲. 我国学校组织变革研究的现状及展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(3): 31-36.
[11]	操太圣, 卢乃桂. 论学校组织变革中的教师认同[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2005, 23(3): 43-48.