面向数智时代的教科书概念演进及其重构

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.12.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“教科书”（Textbook）作为教育学基本概念之一，总是关涉知识的选择、排列和表征，被看作是教育教学的对象或内容。教科书的概念革新遵循介质载体与功能效用两条路径，先后出现了电子教科书、数字教科书、智能教科书等概念，不过这些概念都存在“名不符实”以及可供性缺失问题。从教科书能动理论以及新一代教科书技术的实践发展出发，将教科书概念重构为“数智教育体”，特指融合知识领域数字建模、学生及其学习智能诊断与分析以及智能教学系统为一体的数字化-智能化教育能动体。数智教育体的提出，不仅蕴含着新的教育理解和教育理论，还意味着研究问题的更新和研究方法的转换，具有丰富的教育理论意蕴。

关键词: 数智时代, 教科书, 数智教育体, 教育理论意蕴

Abstract:

As one of the basic concepts in pedagogy, “textbook” is always concerned with the selection, arrangement and representation of knowledge, and is regarded as the object or content of education and teaching. The conceptual innovation of textbook has followed two paths: medium carrier and functional utility, and the concepts of e-textbook, digital textbook and intelligent textbook have emerged successively, but these concepts all suffer from the problems of “name not reality” and affordance. From the agent theory of textbook and the practical development of new-generation textbook technology, the concept of textbook is reconstructed as “Digital and Intelligent Education agent”, which refers to the integrating digital modeling of knowledge domains, intelligent diagnosis and analysis of students and their learning, as well as intelligent teaching systems. The introduction of the new concept not only implies a new understanding and theory of education, but also means the renewal of research problems and the transformation of research methods, which is rich in educational theoretical implications.

Key words: the digital and intelligent era, textbook, digital-intelligent education agent, educational theoretical implications

李云星. 面向数智时代的教科书概念演进及其重构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(12): 63-72.

Yunxing Li. On the Conceptual Evolution and Reconstruction of Textbook Toward the Digital and Intelligent Era[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(12): 63-72.

图/表 1

参考文献 0

	ICI会议\| 陈霜叶教授主旨报告: 数智时代的知识秩序、国家知识管理与教材研究https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/EfwlZ9yJ3cA82lY6_ZSIOg.
	波斯曼. (2019). 技术垄断: 文化向技术投降(何道宽, 译). 北京: 中信出版集团.
	侯怀银, 原左晔. (2023). 教育数字化呼唤数字教育学. 中国远程教育, 43 (11), 11- 21.
	李云星, 王良辉, 周跃良. (2019). 信息技术的教育理论意蕴及其限度. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 37 (05), 17- 25.
	李政涛. (2020). 什么是“教育基本理论”. 高等教育研究, 41 (03), 1- 17.
	刘伟. (2022). 政治学话语体系建设中的概念重构. 中国社会科学评价, (04), 10- 18.
	隋岩. (2009). 从能指与所指关系的演变解析符号的社会化. 现代传播-中国传媒大学学报, (06), 21- 23.
	孙凝翔, 韩松. (2020). “可供性”: 译名之辩与范式/概念之变. 国际新闻界, (09), 122- 141.
	习近平. (2016). 在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话. 党史文汇, (6), 4- 13.
	徐勇. (2019). 学术创新的基点: 概念的解构与建构. 文史哲, (01), 10- 13.
	杨佳, 杨汉麟. (2019). 夸美纽斯和他的《世界图解》. 教育研究与实验, (01), 74- 78.
	张广斌, 薛克勋. (2023). 数字教育学的底层逻辑与构建路径——兼论中国式数字教育学建设. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41 (11), 67- 84.
	Ajayi, L. (2012). How Teachers Deploy Multimodal Textbooks to Enhance English Language Learning. Tesol Journal, 6 (1), 16- 35.
	Biesta, G. J., & Osberg, D. (2007). Beyond re/presentation: A case for updating the epistemology of schooling. Interchange, 38 (1), 15- 29. doi: 10.1007/s10780-007-9015-2
	Carmel, Y. H., Olsher, S., Elkin-Koren, N., & Yerushalmy, M. (2019). eTextbooks: Challenges to Pedagogy, Law, and Policy. In Y. Kali, A. Baram-Tsabari, & A. M. Schejter (Eds.), Learning In a Networked Society: Spontaneous and Designed Technology Enhanced Learning Communities (pp. 177−199). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14610-8_10.
	Choppin, A. (2008). Le manuel scolaire, une fausse évidence historique. Histoire de l’éducation, 23 (117), 7- 56.
	Friesen, N. (2013). The Past and Likely Future of an Educational Form: A Textbook Case. Educational Researcher, 42 (9), 498- 508. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13513535
	Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
	Goh, D. (2022). Rethinking textbooks as active social agents in interpretivist research. The Curriculum Journal, 33 (4), 602- 617. doi: 10.1002/curj.162
	Hollingsworth, M. L., & Narayanan, N. H. (2016). Building a better eTextbook. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 18 (2/3), 14- 17.
	Issitt, J. (2004). Reflections on the study of textbooks. History of education, 33 (6), 683- 696. doi: 10.1080/0046760042000277834
	Jiang, B., Gu, M., Du, Y. (2023). Recent Advances in Intelligent Textbooks for Better Learning. In: Niemi, H., Pea, R. D., Lu, Y. (eds) AI in Learning: Designing the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09687-7_15.
	Lange, A. C., Lenglet, M., & Seyfert, R. (2019). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26 (4), 598- 617. doi: 10.1177/1350508418808230
	Maynard, S., & Cheyne, E. (2005). Can electronic textbooks help children to learn? Electron. Libr., 23, 103- 115.
	Oral, S. B. (2013). What is Wrong with Using Textbooks in Education?. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45 (3), 318- 333. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2012.751016
	Roldán Vera, E. (2018). Textbooks and education. The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies, 103—114.
	Saarinen, T., & Huhta, A. (2022). The Ideal Learner as Envisioned by Can Do Statements and Grammar Revisions: How Textbook Agency Is Constructed. In New Materialist Explorations into Language Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 151—172.
	Sikorová, Z., Bagoly-Simó, P. (2021). Textbook as a Medium: Impulses from Media Studies for Research on Teaching Materials and Textbooks in Educational Sciences. In: Bagoly-Simó, P., Sikorová, Z. (eds) Textbooks and Educational Media: Perspectives from Subject Education. IARTEM 2015. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80346-9_1.
	Sojot, A. N. (2020). New Materialism and Educational Innovation. In: Peters, M., Heraud, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_112-1.
	Sosnovsky, S., Brusilovsky, P., Lan, A. (2023). Intelligent Textbooks: The Fifth International Workshop. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dimitrova, V., Matsuda, N., Santos, O. C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky. AIED 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_15.
	Stray, C. (1994). Paradigms Regained: Towards a Historical Sociology of the Textbook. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26 (1), 1- 29. doi: 10.1080/0022027940260101
	Wakefield, J. F. (1998). A Brief History of Textbooks: Where Have We Been All These Years? Paper presented at the Meeting of the Text and Academic Authors St. Petersburg, FL, June 12—13.

[1]	郭戈. 论陈伯吹的教材思想[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(12): 116-125.
[2]	吴小鸥. “教科书”考释[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(5): 117-126.
[3]	湛中乐, 黄宇骁. 日本历史教科书问题的法理解读——以家永三郎教科书案为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(5): 148-160+171.
[4]	张倩, 黄毅英, 石鸥. 教科书的使用:教师与教科书的互动关系研究——基于中国内地、香港和台湾数学教科书的调查与分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2018, 36(1): 77-84+162+163.
[5]	刘晖, 李惠, 李俊堂, 张立. 台湾教科书政策未来走向研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(6): 71-81+155.
[6]	张心科. 教科书如何兼顾地域特点和城乡差异：1910-1930年代的探索[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(4): 119-124.
[7]	吴小鸥,姚艳. 民族脊梁：1933年“复兴教科书”的启蒙坚守?[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(4): 113-118.
[8]	周仕德. 从教育学教科书看我国60年来的教师叙写*[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(3): 119-124.
[9]	吴小鸥，李想. 赋权女性：晚清民国女子教科书的启蒙诉求[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2014, 32(1): 103-110.
[10]	陈波. 《全美中小学历史课程标准》及其论争[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(3): 92-92.
[11]	吴小鸥. 现代性:清末民初教科书的启蒙诉求[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2010, 28(4): 71-81.