华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 57-66.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.08.006

• 基本理论与基本问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

家庭文化资本对学生阅读素养的影响:基于多层logistic模型的实证研究

李小红1, 王杉2, 陈晨1, 杨婕3, 唐向黎4   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学 中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心,北京 100875
    2. 北京市建华实验亦庄学校,北京 100176
    3. 北京师范大学亚太实验学校,北京 102209
    4. 重庆市梁平职业教育中心,重庆 405200
  • 出版日期:2022-08-01 发布日期:2022-07-26
  • 基金资助:
    北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心2020年度研究生自主课题“中国四省市学生阅读素养的影响因素研究——基于PISA2018数据与多级logistic模型的分析”(BJZK-2020A2-20016)

The Impact of Family Cultural Capital on Students’ Reading Literacy: An Empirical Study Based on Multilevel Logistic Model

Xiaohong Li1, shan Wang2, Chen Chen1, Jie Yang3, Xiangli Tang4   

  1. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality , Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    2. Beijing Jianhua Experimental Etown School, Beijing 100176
    3. Asia-Pacific Experimental School of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 102209
    4. Chongqing Liangping Vocational Education Center, Chongqing 405200
  • Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-07-26

摘要:

研究基于PISA2018中国四省市数据,采用多层logistic模型,分析了制度化家庭文化资本、具体化家庭文化资本以及客观化家庭文化资本对学生阅读素养的影响,探究了三种不同类型的家庭文化资本对学生阅读素养影响的城乡差异和性别差异。研究结果表明,三种不同类型的家庭文化资本的增加都会对学生的阅读素养产生积极影响,但不同类型的家庭文化资本对学生阅读素养的影响存在显著的城乡差异和性别差异。城乡差异表现为:制度化家庭文化资本只对城市学生的阅读素养影响显著;在客观化家庭文化资本中,家庭教育资源对乡村学生的阅读素养影响显著,家庭文化资源对城市学生的阅读素养影响显著。性别差异表现为:客观化家庭文化资本之家庭文化资源对女生的阅读素养影响显著,对男生的阅读素养影响不显著。

关键词: 家庭文化资本, 阅读素养, 多层logistic模型, PISA

Abstract:

Based on the PISA2018 B-J-S-Z data, this study uses a multi-layer logistic model to analyze the impact of institutionalized family cultural capital, specific family cultural capital and objective family cultural capital on students’ reading literacy, and explores the urban-rural and gender differences of the impact on students’ reading literacy further. The results show that the increase of three kinds of family cultural capital will have a positive predictive effect on students’ reading literacy, but there are significant urban-rural and gender differences in the impact of different types on students’ reading literacy. The differences between urban and rural areas are as follows: institutionalized family cultural capital only has a significant impact on urban students’ reading literacy; in the objective family cultural capital, family educational resources have a significant impact on rural students’ reading literacy, and family cultural resources have a significant impact on urban students’ reading literacy. Gender differences are as follows: the family cultural resources of objectifying family cultural capital have a significant impact on girls’ reading literacy, but there is no significant impact on boys’ reading literacy.

Key words: family cultural capital, reading literacy, multilevel logistic model, PISA