Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 112-126.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.03.010
• ? • Previous Articles
Jiajia Yao1, Yan Li2, Jinjin Pan2, Mengmeng Cheng3
Online:
2022-03-01
Published:
2022-03-01
Jiajia Yao, Yan Li, Jinjin Pan, Mengmeng Cheng. Research on the Influence of Dialogic Peer Feedback on College Students’ Online Deep Learning[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(3): 112-126.
"
周次 | 讨论问题/任务 |
4 | 影响资源获取和利用的最主要因素是什么?(环境条件问题?使用者的能力问题?资源本身的问题?还是教育培训问题?抑或其他因素?)请选择一个你认为最重要的因素并阐述理由。 |
5 | 课件制作与使用的哪些方面会依次如何影响实际教学效果?(PPT教学内容设计方面?PPT视觉设计方面?PPT资源素材方面?还是PPT使用行为方面?抑或其他方面?)请对你认为重要的方面按照影响程度依次排列并阐述理由。 |
6 | 从教学视角出发,快速建站系统建立的网页与PPT、微课的异同点有哪些(请给出清晰的比较分析)?微课作为三者中最备受争议的一个教学工具,你对其在教学中的使用持何态度(如果支持多多利用,请给出如何利用好的方案;如果不建议经常使用,请给出具体的分析理由)? |
7 | 智慧课堂与传统课堂以及传统信息技术支持的课堂之间有何具体差异(请利用图表或思维导图等可视化工具给出系统的比较分析结果)?作为新时代备受瞩目和赋予众望的智慧课堂,它如何促进传统课堂或传统信息技术支持的课堂所做不到的学生对知识更深层的学习和理解(请利用图表、流程图或思维导图等可视化工具给出你思考和探究的结果)? |
8 | 回顾历年高等教育和基础教育地平线报告中的技术、趋势、挑战的发展过程,你认为技术与教育融合最大的趋势和问题是什么,并从自己今后可能作为一个基础教育或高等教育教师的角度给出自己会如何应对的方案?(有能力的同学可结合图表可视化呈现两个教育领域历年的发展变化过程并突出显示自己选定的重点趋势和问题)根据你选定的技术趋势、应用问题以及你认为游戏化学习最大的难点,以开展游戏化教学为例,简单设计一项技术融入教学的主题学习活动,并分析在你的设计中是如何体现相关趋势、避免相关问题和解决相关难点的(请结合图表或活动流程图等工具可视化呈现自己简单的设计思路)? |
"
认知层次 | 对问题的回应特征 | 评分 | |
无结构 | 学生并没有理解问题核心或只反馈了问题无关紧要的方面,对问题解决的意义不大。 | 0 | |
单一结构 | 学生只单独反馈了问题相关的其中一个方面,缺乏问题解决的主要观点。 | 1 | |
多元结构 | 低 | 学生对问题相关的不止一个方面进行了反馈,但反馈内容和范围有限,且反馈时没有对这些方面涉及的知识信息进行整合、联系,而是将其视为彼此独立不相干的部分进行分别回应,没有对表达的主要观点进一步发展。 | 2 |
中 | 学生对问题相关的较多方面进行了反馈,但反馈缺乏对这些方面相关知识信息的有机整合,只是依次罗列、排序地回应,对主要观点没有或进行了较为简单的发展。 | 3 | |
高 | 学生对问题相关的较多方面进行了反馈,且尝试在反馈中整合其中某些方面相关的知识信息,但没有实现全面的整合,通过详细阐述、拓展、示例对一部分主要观点进行了发展,反馈较为丰富。 | 4 | |
关联结构 | 低 | 学生对问题相关的大部分知识信息进行了整合反馈,可能有少数内容略微偏离整体讨论主题或框架,但没有出现完全无关或独立的内容模块,相关主题、观点都在详细阐述、拓展、示例的论证过程中得到了一定的发展。 | 5 |
高 | 学生全程基于有力的结构化论证对问题相关的知识信息进行了全面的整合反馈,没有出现任何无关的内容,所有相关的主题、观点都在详细阐述、拓展、示例中得到了很好的发展。 | 6 | |
抽象拓展结构 | 学生在关联的基础上,对问题进行更全面的思考,概括出更抽象的特征,生成一般性假设并应用到新情境中,拓展问题本身的意义。 | 7 |
"
序号 | 类型 | 三种学习方法组合 | 特征描述 | ||
D | A | S | |||
1 | NA | 0 ? | 0 ? | 0 ? | 低成就动机者:此类学生学习需求低下,但不一定智力低下,往往在公开评估他们的能力尤其在竞争环境下,其防御能力很高,最大恐惧是害怕因为失败而丢面子,因此其往往是熟练的任务回避者,会通过“忘记”关键任务、给自己设定不可能的高目标或微不足道的目标甚至是身心疾病等原因来达到这一目的。 |
+ | 0 ? | + | |||
2 | S | 0 ? | 0 ? | + | 一般浅表学习者:此类学生一般学术自我信念较差,会低估自己相对于同伴的表现,并对自己的表现不满意;他们在客观标准上表现不佳,并有可能因此而不成熟地放弃学习;在适合死记硬背的学习任务中,他们可能会做得很好,但前提是知识结构并不那么复杂。 |
3 | SA | 0 ? | + | + | 成就导向的浅表学习者:此类学生也想要取得成就,但他们采用表面方法来实现目标,通常没有获得成功,但他们确实有想做好的心,可能需要老师引导他们采用合理的学习策略组织他们的学习,鼓励他们合理安排学习时间、科学做好学习笔记等,尤其阻止其死记硬背。 |
4 | A | 0 ? | + | 0 ? | 纯成就导向者:此类学生主要对获得好成绩感兴趣,他们往往会目的明确、雄心勃勃地基于高结构的课程大纲学习,具有很高的学术自我信念,并在常规考试中表现良好,但其有时会成为机会主义者,不愿意与同伴透露学习相关信息、讨论学习任务内容或给予同伴帮助等。 |
5 | D | + | 0 ? | 0 ? | 一般深度学习者:此类学生学业表现往往较为出色,会遵循自己的学术兴趣,并能够结合自身经历,自主挖掘案例,以及跟进自己的学习过程,擅长和适合独立学习,不喜欢被老师过于指导。 |
6 | DA | + | + | + 0 ? | 成就导向的深度学习者:此类学生结合了深度学习者和成就导向者的优点,将意义寻求、基于兴趣的探索、联系自身经历的学习与针对课程大纲精心计划的学习策略相结合,从而在相关主题中获得高分,其获得的往往是高质量的学习结果,通常学习过程没什么问题。 |
"
N | M | SD | df | t | p | |||
非深度学习者(NA/S/SA/A) | 深度学习方法 | 前测 | 73 | 20.96 | 2.70 | 72 | 5.68*** | 0.00 |
后测 | 73 | 23.03 | 3.12 | |||||
策略学习方法 | 前测 | 73 | 19.63 | 4.04 | 72 | 7.00*** | 0.00 | |
后测 | 73 | 22.66 | 3.69 | |||||
浅表学习方法 | 前测 | 73 | 18.33 | 3.79 | 72 | ?4.22*** | 0.00 | |
后测 | 73 | 16.34 | 4.54 | |||||
认知层次 | 前测 | 54 | 1.75 | 0.76 | 53 | 12.47*** | 0.00 | |
后测 | 54 | 3.41 | 0.87 | |||||
深度学习者(D/DA) | 深度学习方法 | 前测 | 14 | 26.79 | 1.72 | 13 | ?0.70 | 0.50 |
后测 | 14 | 26.00 | 3.96 | |||||
策略学习方法 | 前测 | 14 | 23.71 | 4.45 | 13 | 0.62 | 0.55 | |
后测 | 14 | 24.50 | 5.16 | |||||
浅表学习方法 | 前测 | 14 | 18.00 | 5.68 | 13 | ?1.62 | 0.13 | |
后测 | 14 | 15.64 | 5.50 | |||||
认知层次 | 前测 | 11 | 1.81 | 0.72 | 10 | 4.71*** | 0.001 | |
后测 | 11 | 3.03 | 0.71 |
"
序号 | 类型 | 学习方法类型转变(N) | 认知层次类型转变(N) | |||||
↓ | — | ↑ | ↓ | — | ↑ | |||
1 | NA | 无 | NA-NA(20) | NA-S(3) NA-SA(1) NA-A(10) NA-D(3) NA-DA(5) | 无 | M-M(20) | U-M(7) U-R(1) M-R(6) | |
2 | S | S-NA(3) | S-S(3) | S-SA(1) S-A(2) S-DA(5) | 无 | M-M(6) | U-M(3) M-R(1) | |
3 | SA | 无 | SA-SA(1) | SA-DA(2) | 无 | M-M(1) | 无 | |
4 | A | A-NA(1) A-S(1) | A-A(6) | A-DA(6) | 无 | M-M(8) | M-R(1) | |
5 | D | D-NA(1) | D-D(2) | D-DA(3) | 无 | M-M(4) | 无 | |
6 | DA | DA-NA(1) DA-S(1) DA-A(1) | DA-DA(5) | 无 | 无 | M-M(5) | U-M(2) |
"
参与度指标 | 学习者类型 | N | M | SD | t | p |
原发帖量 | 非深度学习者 | 75 | 8.73 | 6.18 | ?0.15 | 0.88 |
深度学习者 | 15 | 9.00 | 6.38 | |||
回帖量 | 非深度学习者 | 75 | 1.97 | 1.45 | ?3.76*** | 0.00 |
深度学习者 | 15 | 3.47 | 1.13 | |||
被回帖量 | 非深度学习者 | 75 | 2.09 | 1.73 | ?1.87 | 0.07 |
深度学习者 | 15 | 3.00 | 1.65 | |||
特征向量中心度 | 非深度学习者 | 75 | 0.18 | 0.29 | ?2.54** | 0.01 |
深度学习者 | 15 | 0.39 | 0.33 | |||
聚类系数 | 非深度学习者 | 75 | 0.44 | 0.40 | ?4.26*** | 0.00 |
深度学习者 | 15 | 0.78 | 0.26 |
李艳, 姚佳佳 高等教育技术应用的热点与趋势——《地平线报告(2018高教版)》及十年回顾 开放教育研究 2018 24 6 12 28 李艳, 姚佳佳. (2018). 高等教育技术应用的热点与趋势—《地平线报告(2018高教版)》及十年回顾. 开放教育研究,24(6),12—28. | |
许玲, 郑勤华 在线论坛在远程开放学习中使用现状研究: 基于辅导教师的视角 北京广播电视大学学报 2016 3 25 30 许玲, 郑勤华. (2016). 在线论坛在远程开放学习中使用现状研究: 基于辅导教师的视角. 北京广播电视大学学报,(3),25—30. | |
张浩, 吴秀娟, 王静 深度学习的目标与评价体系构建 中国电化教育 2014 7 51 55 张浩, 吴秀娟, 王静. (2014). 深度学习的目标与评价体系构建. 中国电化教育,(7),51—55.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2014.07.008 |
|
张蔷. (2011). 提高大学生在线学习参与度的策略研究. 浙江师范大学. | |
郑晓丽, 赖文华, 刘根萍, 金会洙, 王峰 争论式教学支架对学生知识加工的影响——基于翻转课堂的实验研究 开放教育研究 2018 24 5 81 91 郑晓丽, 赖文华, 刘根萍, 金会洙, 王峰. (2018). 争论式教学支架对学生知识加工的影响—基于翻转课堂的实验研究. 开放教育研究,24(5),81—91. | |
AIR. (2014). Evidence of deeper learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Report_3_Evidence_of_Deeper_Learning_Outcomes.pdf. | |
Baumann-Birkbeck, L., Karaksha, A., Anoopkumar-Dukie, S., Grant, G. D., Davey, A. K., Nirthanan, S., & Owen, S. J Benefits of e-learning in chemotherapy pharmacology education Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning 2015 7 1 106 111 Baumann-Birkbeck, L., Karaksha, A., Anoopkumar-Dukie, S., Grant, G. D., Davey, A. K., Nirthanan, S., & Owen, S. J. (2015). Benefits of e-learning in chemotherapy pharmacology education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 7(1), 106—111. | |
Bevan, S. J., Chan, C. W. L., & Tanner, J. A Diverse assessment and active student engagement sustain deep learning: A comparative study of outcomes in two parallel introductory biochemistry courses Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Education 2015 42 6 474 479 Bevan, S. J., Chan, C. W. L., & Tanner, J. A. (2015). Diverse assessment and active student engagement sustain deep learning: A comparative study of outcomes in two parallel introductory biochemistry courses. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Education, 42(6), 474—479. | |
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F The psychological structure of creative writing Australian Journal of Education 1982 26 1 59 70 Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). The psychological structure of creative writing. Australian Journal of Education, 26(1), 59—70.
doi: 10.1177/000494418202600104 |
|
Biggs, J. B Individual differences in the study process and the quality of learning outcomes Higher Education 1979 8 4 381 394 Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in the study process and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381—394.
doi: 10.1007/BF01680526 |
|
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Learning process questionnaire manual: Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. | |
Boud, D., & Molloy, E Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design Assessing Evaluation in Higher Education 2013 38 6 698 712 Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessing Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698—712.
doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 |
|
Burnett, P. C Assessing the structure of learning outcomes from counselling using the SOLO taxonomy: An exploratory study British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 1999 27 4 567 580 Burnett, P. C. (1999). Assessing the structure of learning outcomes from counselling using the SOLO taxonomy: An exploratory study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 27(4), 567—580.
doi: 10.1080/03069889908256291 |
|
Chen, B., Chang, Y. -H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics The Internet and Higher Education 2018 37 21 30 Chen, B., Chang, Y. -H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21—30.
doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002 |
|
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K Peer reviewers learn from giving comments Instructional Science 2011 39 5 629 643 Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629—643.
doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 |
|
Dahlstrom, O Learning during a collaborative final exam Educational Research and Evaluation 2012 18 4 321 332 Dahlstrom, O. (2012). Learning during a collaborative final exam. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(4), 321—332.
doi: 10.1080/13803611.2012.674689 |
|
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature Advances in Health Sciences Education 2016 21 5 1087 1112 Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087—1112.
doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6 |
|
Entwistle, N. (2000, November). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts [Conference presentation]. ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme 1st Annual Conference (TLRP), University of Leicester. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003220.htm. | |
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260291730_Approaches_and_Study_Skills_Inventory_for_Students_ASSIST_incorporating_the_Revised_Approaches_to_Studying_Inventory_-_RASI. | |
Eshwar, S., Jain, V., Rekha, K., & Manvi, S Comparison of mind mapping and lecture based teaching learning method among dental undergraduates using SOLO taxonomy in dental anaesthesiology Journal of Dental Sciences 2016 4 3 169 177 Eshwar, S., Jain, V., Rekha, K., & Manvi, S. (2016). Comparison of mind mapping and lecture based teaching learning method among dental undergraduates using SOLO taxonomy in dental anaesthesiology. Journal of Dental Sciences, 4(3), 169—177. | |
Filius, R. M., Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in spocs Computers & Education 2018 125 86 100 Filius, R. M., Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in spocs. Computers & Education, 125, 86—100. | |
Gu, X. Q., & Cai, H. Y How a semantic diagram tool influences transaction costs during collaborative problem solving Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2018 1 11 Gu, X. Q., & Cai, H. Y. (2018). How a semantic diagram tool influences transaction costs during collaborative problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1—11. | |
Ke, F., & Xie, K Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses The Internet and Higher Education 2009 12 3 136 145 Ke, F., & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 136—145. | |
Ilgüy, M., Ilgüy, D., Fisekçioglu, E., & Oktay, I Comparison of case-based and lecture-based learning in dental education using the solo taxonomy Journal of Dental Education 2014 78 11 1521 1527 Ilgüy, M., Ilgüy, D., Fisekçioglu, E., & Oktay, I. (2014). Comparison of case-based and lecture-based learning in dental education using the solo taxonomy. Journal of Dental Education, 78(11), 1521—1527.
doi: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.11.tb05827.x |
|
Marton, F., & Sajlo, R On qualitative differences in learning: II outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1976 46 2 115 127 Marton, F., & Sajlo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: II. outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115—127. | |
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2014 39 1 102 122 Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102—122. | |
NRC. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. | |
Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. -H The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions British Journal of Educational Technology 2018 50 3 1396 1414 Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. -H. (2018). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396—1414. | |
Ruegg, R Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback RELC Journal 2015 46 2 131 145 Ruegg, R. (2015). Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 46(2), 131—145.
doi: 10.1177/0033688214562799 |
|
Sapouna, M Evaluating the impact of the patchwork text process in criminal justice education Innovations in Education & Teaching International 2016 55 3 376 383 Sapouna, M. (2016). Evaluating the impact of the patchwork text process in criminal justice education. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 55(3), 376—383. | |
Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2017 15 18 30 Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18—30.
doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002 |
|
Trevelyan, R., & Wilson, A Using patchwork texts in assessment: Clarifying and categorising choices in their use Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2012 37 4 487 498 Trevelyan, R., & Wilson, A. (2012). Using patchwork texts in assessment: Clarifying and categorising choices in their use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 487—498. | |
van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. -J Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider Educational Research Review 2017 20 24 34 van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. -J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24—34.
doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 |
|
Wilkinson, K. (2016). The integration of mobile learning app-based quiz-games in higher education teaching of anatomical sciences (Doctoral dissertation). Middlesex University Research Repository. |
[1] | Changjun Yue, Wenqi Qiu. The Scale and Structure of Higher Education and Public Educational Funding in China: An Empirical Prediction till 2035 [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 1-16. |
[2] | Hua Wang, Xiaobing Sun. The Logical Structure and Legislative Perfection of China’s Higher Education Legal System [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 82-87. |
[3] | Yang Si, Jingjing Zhang, Xinyue Li, Ruolan Wen. The Value and Practice Path of Integrating Public Welfare Elements into Labor Education in Universities: Experience from the Public Welfare Talent Training Program of East China Normal University [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(12): 107-115. |
[4] | Xue Haiping, Zhao Yang. Does Private Tutoring Help High School Students Gain Higher Education Opportunity? [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(5): 93-102. |
[5] | Sui Yifan. A Framework of the Innovative Study on the Internal Governance System in the Higher Education Institution [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(12): 21-32. |
[6] | Yin Hongbiao. The Behavioral, Psychological and Socio-cultural Perspectives of Student Engagement Research: Perspective Shift and its Implications for Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Chinese Universities [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(11): 1-20. |
[7] | Li Jing, Liu Hui. The Theory of Higher Education Development: Deconstruction and Reconstruction [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(6): 75-82. |
[8] | Zhang Xuewen. Quality Evaluation Needed for “The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System”: A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(4): 84-93. |
[9] | MA Luting. Structured Instruction in Higher Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2019, 37(1): 137-145+170. |
[10] | SHI Jinghuan, WANG Wen. Learner-Centered Education for Sustainable Development: The Academic and Policy Implication of Research on China College Student Learning [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(4): 18-27+162. |
[11] | HUANG Yuheng, SHI Jinghuan. Education, Background and Policy: The Allocation Mechanism of Minority Students' Access to Higher Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(4): 62-70+163+164. |
[12] | YAO Yiran. Phenomenon of Disciplinization Impulsion in Higher Education [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2018, 36(4): 142-149+167. |
[13] | SUI Yifan. The Suspension of University Problems [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2017, 35(6): 82-94+155+156. |
[14] | CAO Yan;ZHANG Ruijuan. Access to Top Universities and its Regional Disparity:2008-2015 [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2016, 34(4): 52-65. |
[15] | HUANG Zhao-Xin,ZHANG Zhong-Qiu,ZHAO Guo-Jing,WANG Zhi-Qiang. The Development of Entrepreneurship Education in UK Higher Education Institutions and its Implication [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educationa, 2016, 34(2): 39-44. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||