Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 22-32.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2023.04.002
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhongjing Huang1, Kaiyue Shang2, Jing Zhang2
Accepted:
2022-12-02
Online:
2023-04-01
Published:
2023-03-11
Zhongjing Huang, Kaiyue Shang, Jing Zhang. Does Growth Mindset Affect Students’ Social and Emotional Skills Development: Empirical Analyses Based on OECD Social and Emotional Skills Study[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(4): 22-32.
"
年龄 | N | M(SD) | t | p | Cohen’d | 95% CI | |
10岁 | 男 | 1977 | 6.81(2.28) | 1.768 | 0.08 | 0.06 | [?0.01, 0.27] |
女 | 1654 | 6.94(2.12) | |||||
高社会经济地位 | 907 | 7.17(2.36) | 4.607 | 0.00 | 0.22 | [0.27, 0.67] | |
低社会经济地位 | 907 | 6.70(2.00) | |||||
15岁 | 男 | 1849 | 6.94(2.00) | ?0.324 | 0.75 | 0.01 | [?0.15, 0.10] |
女 | 1755 | 6.92(1.83) | |||||
高社会经济地位 | 903 | 7.18(1.97) | 5.081 | 0.00 | 0.24 | [0.28, 0.64] | |
低社会经济地位 | 903 | 6.72(1.85) |
"
学生 | 家长 | 教师 | |||||
10岁 | 15岁 | 10岁 | 15岁 | 10岁 | 15岁 | ||
交往能力 | 果敢 | 0.13** | 0.18** | 0.05** | 0.06** | 0.02** | ?0.01** |
乐群 | 0.18** | 0.24** | 0.07** | 0.04** | ?0.01* | ?0.04** | |
活力 | 0.18** | 0.21** | 0.07** | 0.03** | 0.02** | ?0.02** | |
任务能力 | 毅力 | 0.17** | 0.19** | 0.06** | 0.07** | ?0.01** | ?0.01** |
责任感 | 0.16** | 0.20** | 0.05** | 0.02** | 0.01* | < 0.01 | |
自控力 | 0.13** | 0.16** | 0.04** | 0.05** | < 0.01 | 0.02* | |
情绪调节 | 抗压力 | 0.18** | 0.16** | 0.06** | 0.01* | 0.01** | ?0.03** |
乐观 | 0.19** | 0.23** | 0.06** | 0.05** | ?0.02** | ?0.02** | |
情绪控制 | 0.13** | 0.22** | 0.03** | 0.06** | ?0.01** | ?0.02** | |
协作能力 | 共情 | 0.16** | 0.23** | 0.04** | 0.04** | ?0.01** | ?0.01** |
合作 | 0.16** | 0.23** | 0.04** | 0.05** | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | |
信任 | 0.10** | 0.18** | 0.01** | 0.02** | ?0.04** | ?0.01 | |
开放能力 | 包容度 | 0.17** | 0.25** | 0.04** | 0.06** | < 0.01 | ?0.01 |
好奇心 | 0.17** | 0.24** | 0.05** | 0.07** | < 0.01 | ?0.01 | |
创造性 | 0.18** | 0.23** | 0.09** | 0.06** | 0.02** | ?0.02** |
"
学生(N = 3635) | 家长(N = 3572) | 教师(N = 1397) | |||||||||||||
R2 | β | t | 95% CI | R2 | β | t | 95% CI | R2 | β | t | 95% CI | ||||
交往能力 | 果敢 | 0.06 | 0.11** | 36.21 | [3.97, 4.42] | 0.05 | 0.02** | 6.40 | [0.67, 1.25] | 0.05 | 0.01** | 4.03 | [0.27, 0.78] | ||
乐群 | 0.06 | 0.17** | 55.23 | [7.89, 8.47] | 0.03 | 0.05** | 15.81 | [2.67, 3.43] | 0.03 | ?0.01** | ?3.56 | [?0.93, ?0.27] | |||
活力 | 0.06 | 0.17** | 55.86 | [7.44, 7.99] | 0.03 | 0.05** | 15.40 | [2.43, 3.14] | 0.03 | 0.02** | 4.89 | [0.46, 1.08] | |||
任务能力 | 毅力 | 0.05 | 0.15** | 49.58 | [7.25, 7.85] | 0.04 | 0.04** | 12.44 | [2.08, 2.86] | 0.03 | ?0.02** | ?5.97 | [?1.37, ?0.69] | ||
责任感 | 0.07 | 0.15** | 47.72 | [7.32, 7.95] | 0.05 | 0.03** | 8.33 | [1.33, 2.14] | 0.04 | < ?0.01 | ?0.98 | [?0.54, 0.18] | |||
自控力 | 0.05 | 0.11** | 36.20 | [4.85, 5.41] | 0.03 | 0.04** | 9.55 | [1.39, 2.11] | 0.03 | ?0.01* | ?2.29 | [?0.68, ?0.05] | |||
情绪调节 | 抗压力 | 0.05 | 0.16** | 53.34 | [8.09, 8.70] | 0.02 | 0.04** | 12.57 | [2.18, 2.98] | 0.02 | ?0.01 | 1.71 | [?0.05, 0.66] | ||
乐观 | 0.06 | 0.18** | 59.41 | [9.07, 9.69] | 0.03 | 0.04** | 13.23 | [2.33, 3.13] | 0.03 | ?0.03** | ?7.93 | [?1.78, ?1.08] | |||
情绪控制 | 0.03 | 0.12** | 39.22 | [6.55, 7.24] | 0.02 | 0.02** | 5.15 | [0.73, 1.62] | 0.02 | ?0.02** | ?5.88 | [?1.55, ?0.78] | |||
协作能力 | 共情 | 0.06 | 0.14** | 46.34 | [7.02, 7.64] | 0.04 | 0.02** | 6.24 | [0.88, 1.69] | 0.04 | ?0.01** | ?3.21 | [?0.93, ?0.23] | ||
合作 | 0.06 | 0.15** | 48.96 | [7.27, 7.87] | 0.03 | 0.03** | 8.07 | [0.99, 1.02] | 0.03 | < ?0.01 | ?0.934 | [?0.51, 0.18] | |||
信任 | 0.02 | 0.09** | 29.12 | [4.77, 5.45] | 0.02 | < ?0.01 | ?1.01 | [?0.67, 0.22] | 0.04 | ?0.02** | ?4.87 | [?1.18, ?0.50] | |||
开放能力 | 包容度 | 0.06 | 0.15** | 49.99 | [7.32, 7.92] | 0.04 | 0.02** | 5.73 | [0.75, 1.53] | 0.02 | ?0.04** | ?11.00 | [?2.57, ?1.79] | ||
好奇心 | 0.03 | 0.16** | 51.78 | [6.94, 7.49] | 0.04 | 0.03** | 9.74 | [1.41, 2.12] | 0.04 | < ?0.01 | ?2.86 | [?0.77, ?0.14] | |||
创造性 | 0.10 | 0.17** | 56.73 | [8.29, 8.89] | 0.07 | 0.06** | 18.25 | [3.21, 3.99] | 0.07 | 0.01** | 4.01 | [0.35, 1.03] |
"
学生(N = 3613) | 家长(N = 3491) | 教师(N = 2327) | |||||||||||||
R2 | β | t | 95% CI | R2 | β | t | 95% CI | R2 | β | t | 95% CI | ||||
交往能力 | 果敢 | 0.05 | 0.17** | 38.30 | [6.14, 6.81] | 0.03 | 0.04** | 9.28 | [1.43, 2.20] | 0.03 | ?0.01** | ?2.94 | [?0.80, ?0.16] | ||
乐群 | 0.07 | 0.22** | 51.56 | [9.50, 10.26] | 0.02 | 0.03** | 5.90 | [0.85, 1.70] | 0.02 | ?0.04** | ?8.23 | [?1.84, ?1.13] | |||
活力 | 0.07 | 0.20** | 46.08 | [7.65, 8.33] | 0.03 | 0.02** | 4.90 | [0.59, 1.38] | 0.03 | ?0.02** | ?5.05 | [?1.18, ?0.52] | |||
任务能力 | 毅力 | 0.06 | 0.19** | 42.47 | [7.20, 7.89] | 0.03 | 0.06** | 12.56 | [2.18, 2.98] | 0.02 | ?0.02** | ?3.79 | [?0.99, ?0.31] | ||
责任感 | 0.05 | 0.19** | 43.24 | [8.32, 9.11] | 0.02 | 0.01* | 2.20 | [0.06, 0.97] | 0.02 | < ?0.01 | ?0.25 | [?0.43, 0.34] | |||
自控力 | 0.05 | 0.16** | 35.35 | [5.87, 6.55] | 0.03 | 0.04** | 8.60 | [1.34, 2.13] | 0.03 | 0.02** | 3.37 | [0.24, 0.90] | |||
情绪调节 | 抗压力 | 0.05 | 0.16** | 35.54 | [6.70, 7.48] | 0.03 | < ?0.01 | ?0.43 | [?0.55, 0.35] | 0.03 | ?0.04** | ?8.04 | [?1.93, ?1.17] | ||
乐观 | 0.07 | 0.23** | 53.68 | [9.56, 10.28] | 0.02 | 0.03** | 7.06 | [1.14, 2.02] | 0.02 | ?0.02** | ?4.44 | [?1.20, ?0.47] | |||
情绪控制 | 0.08 | 0.21** | 49.94 | [6.45, 6.97] | 0.04 | 0.05** | 10.30 | [1.81, 2.66] | 0.04 | ?0.03** | ?5.87 | [?1.42, ?0.71] | |||
协作能力 | 共情 | 0.08 | 0.20** | 47.14 | [8.42, 9.15] | 0.02 | 0.02** | 4.31 | [0.51, 1.37] | 0.02 | ?0.01** | ?2.66 | [?0.84, ?0.12] | ||
合作 | 0.06 | 0.22** | 51.47 | [9.48, 10.23] | 0.01 | 0.04** | 8.44 | [1.45, 2.33] | 0.01 | ?0.01 | ?1.16 | [?0.58, 0.15] | |||
信任 | 0.03 | 0.17** | 39.27 | [7.49, 8.28] | 0.00 | 0.02** | 3.87 | [0.44, 1.36] | <0.01 | ?0.01 | 2.40 | [?0.84, 0.09] | |||
开放能力 | 包容度 | 0.09 | 0.24** | 55.48 | [11.03, 11.84] | 0.04 | 0.04** | 9.12 | [1.73, 2.68] | 0.035 | < ?0.01 | ?0.66 | [?0.53, 0.27] | ||
好奇心 | 0.08 | 0.23** | 52.74 | [8.71, 9.39] | 0.03 | 0.05** | 11.11 | [1.84, 2.62] | 0.03 | < ?0.01 | ?1.42 | [?0.57, 0.09] | |||
创造性 | 0.10 | 0.21** | 49.14 | [9.16, 9.92] | 0.06 | 0.03** | 7.57 | [1.27, 2.15] | 0.06 | ?0.02** | ?5.32 | [?1.37, ?0.63] |
崔海丽. (2021). 提升教师的社会与情感能力刻不容缓. 上海教育, (26), 71- 73. | |
董连春, 闫娜, & 孙佳. (2021). 思维模式、学业成绩与问题提出能力的关系研究——以乌鲁木齐市小学生为例. 民族教育研究, 32 (01), 12- 20. | |
蓝翠娟, & 李晶. (2020). 母亲工作状况对儿童情绪行为问题的影响: 母亲思维方式的调节作用和家庭养育环境的中介作用. 学前教育研究, (02), 57- 67. | |
林崇德, & 李庆安. (2005). 青少年期身心发展特点. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (01), 48- 56. | |
邢淑芬, 俞国良 & 林崇德. (2011). 小学高年级儿童的内隐智力理论及其与表扬的关系. 心理发展与教育, (03), 255- 259. | |
张静, 唐一鹏, 郭家俊, & 邵志芳. (2021). 中国青少年社会与情感能力测评之技术报告. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 39 (09), 109- 126. | |
Bosco, G. L., Renk, K., Dinger, T. M., Epstein, M. K., & Phares, V. (2003). The connections between adolescents' perceptions of parents, parental psychological symptoms, and adolescent functioning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24 (2), 179- 200.
doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00044-3 |
|
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological system theory. Annals of Child Development. | |
Burnette, & Jeni, L. (2013). Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139 (3), 655- 701.
doi: 10.1037/a0029531 |
|
Carr, P. B., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Intelligence and motivation. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds. ), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 748−770). Cambridge University Press | |
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18 (2), 76- 82.
doi: 10.1002/da.10113 |
|
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16 (3), 297- 334.
doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 |
|
De Kraker-Pauw, E., Van Wesel, F., Krabbendam, L., & Van Atteveldt, N. (2017). Teacher mindsets concerning the malleability of intelligence and the appraisal of achievement in the context of feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1594.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594 |
|
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Inventors Digest. | |
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological inquiry, 6 (4), 267- 285.
doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 |
|
Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2000). Self theories. London. | |
Foliano, F., Rolfe, H., Buzzeo, J., Runge, J., & Wilkinson, D. (2019). Changing mindsets: Effectiveness trial. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. | |
Guang, Z., Hanchao, H., & Kaiping, P. (2016). Effect of Growth Mindset on School Engagement and Psychological Well-Being of Chinese Primary and Middle School Students: The Mediating Role of Resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1873. | |
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill. | |
Hatcher, L. (2018). Case study: Changes in elementary student mindset after mathematics anxiety and growth mindset teacher training Oregon: Concordia University. | |
Heslin, P. A., Latham, G. P., & VandeWalle, D. (2005). The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (5), 842- 856.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.842 |
|
Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Implicit theories of intelligence: Reconsidering the role of confidence in achievement motivation. Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem, 197−216. | |
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2014). Predicting school success: Comparing Conscientiousness, Grit, and Emotion Regulation Ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 29- 36.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.005 |
|
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York New York Academic Press, 7 (6), 948- 949. | |
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 330- 358.
doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.0993 |
|
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative Mindsets: Measurement, Correlates, Consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 8 (1), 62- 70.
doi: 10.1037/a0034898 |
|
Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10 (3), 262- 271.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.936962 |
|
Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7 (1), 41- 55.
doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3 |
|
Kyla, Haimovitz, Carol, & Dweck. (2016). What Predicts Children’s Fixed and Growth Intelligence Mind-Sets? Not Their Parents’ Views of Intelligence but Their Parents’ Views of Failure. Psychological Science, 27 (6), 859- 869. | |
Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Dweck, C. S., Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. Dual-process theories in social psychology(pp. 179−202). The Guilford Press. | |
Lockhart, K. L. , Chang, B. , & Story, T. (2002). Young children’s beliefs about the stability of traits: protective optimism? Child Development, 73(5), 1408−1430. | |
Mcfarlane, A. H., Bellissimo, A., & Norman, G. R. (2010). The role of family and peers in social self-efficacy: links to depression in adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65 (3), 402- 410. | |
McGrath, K. F., & van Bergen, P. (2019). Attributions and emotional competence: Why some teachers experience close relationships with disruptive students (and others don’t). Teachers and Teaching, 25 (3), 334- 357.
doi: 10.1080/13540602.2019.1569511 |
|
Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American psychologist, 61 (3), 192- 203.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192 |
|
Moorman, E. A., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2010). Ability mindsets inflfluence the quality of mothers’ involvement in children’s learning: An experimental investigation. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1354- 1362.
doi: 10.1037/a0020376 |
|
Mouratidis, A., Michou, A., & Vassiou, A. (2017). Adolescents’ Autonomous Functioning and Implicit Theories of Ability as Predictors of their School Achievement and Week-to-week Study Regulation and Well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 56- 66.
doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.001 |
|
Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108 (3), 300- 313.
doi: 10.1037/edu0000064 |
|
Parker, J., Summerfeldt, L. J., Hogan, M. J., & Majeski, S. A. (2004). Emotional intelligence and academic success: Examining the transition from high school to university. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (1), 163- 172.
doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00076-X |
|
Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set Interventions Are a Scalable Treatment for Academic Underachievement. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 784.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615571017 |
|
Régner, I., Smeding, A., Gimmig, D., Thinus-Blanc, C., Monteil, J. M., & Huguet, P. (2010). Individual differences in working memory moderate stereotype-threat effects. Psychological Science, 21 (11), 1646- 1648.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610386619 |
|
Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35 (4), 939- 951.
doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00310-0 |
|
West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C., & Gabrieli, J. (2016). Promise and Paradox: Measuring Students’ Non-Cognitive Skills and the Impact of Schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38 (1), 148- 170.
doi: 10.3102/0162373715597298 |
|
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational psychologist, 47 (4), 302- 314.
doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 |
|
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364- 369.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y |
|
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Flint, K., & Roberts, A. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108 (3), 374- 391.
doi: 10.1037/edu0000098 |
|
Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). An Implicit Theories of Personality Intervention Reduces Adolescent Aggression in Response to Victimization and Exclusion. Child Development, 84 (3), 970- 988.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12003 |
[1] | Yan He, Keman Yuan, Mingming Zhang, Yufang Bian. The Profiles of Parental Control and its Influence on Adolescents’ Adaptation: Based on Latent Transition Analysis [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2023, 41(1): 25-39. |
[2] | Lei Zheng, Yu Sun. Where there is a Will, there is a Way: Heterogeneous Effects of Students’ Willpower on Cognitive Abilities [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(8): 83-95. |
[3] | Jing Zhang. IQ or EQ: Which is More Important for Students’ Learning ? [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(11): 69-79. |
[4] | Gang Cheng, Sihui Du, Qian Yu. Are Your Educational Expectations Rational? Research on Effects of Parent-Child Discrepancies in Educational Expectations on Academic Performance [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2022, 40(1): 74-87. |
[5] | Zhenguo Yuan, Zhongjing Huang, Jingjuan Li, Jing Zhang. Report on Chinese Adolescence’s Development of Social and Emotional Skills [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 1-32. |
[6] | Jing Zhang, Yipeng Tang, Jiajun Guo, Zhifang Shao. The Technical Report on OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 109-126. |
[7] | Xingyuan Gao, Hongyan Chen, Jie Wu, Zhongjing Huang. Task Performance: Report on the Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence (I) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 33-46. |
[8] | Zhi Liu, Ruirui Zhu, Haili Cui, Zhongjing Huang. Emotional Regulation: Report on the Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence (II) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 47-61. |
[9] | Yipeng Tang, Jie Zheng, Xiaoxue Sun, Zhongjing Huang. Collaboration: Report on the Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence (III) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 62-76. |
[10] | Zhifang Shao, Zhi Liu, Shuyu Yang, Zhongjing Huang. Open-mindedness: Report on the Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence (IV) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 77-92. |
[11] | Zhongjing Huang, Qian Wang, Huanchun Chen, Xingyuan Gao. Engaging with Others: The Report on the Study on Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescents (V) [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(9): 93-108. |
[12] | Yong Zhao. Fundamental Issues in Educational Assessment [J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(4): 1-14. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||