货币性激励能提升中小学教师校际交流意愿吗？——基于7省市278所学校的调查数据

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.06.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文采用7省市278所学校教师的调查数据，分别通过两分类别逻辑回归和一般有序逻辑回归方法就中小学教师参与校际交流意愿和对津贴补助期望水平的影响因素进行了计量分析。在控制个体特征、学校特征和区位特征的条件下，重点考察了津贴补助与住房福利政策对促进教师校际交流的效果。研究发现，目前中小学教师校际流动以学校类型和区位同层交流居多，津贴补助和住房福利政策的覆盖率比较低，教师期待的津贴补助数额达工资30%左右，各地保障水平与教师期望还有较大差距。津贴补助和住房福利能显著提升中小学教师的校际交流意愿，为流动教师提供住房福利可有效降低他们对津贴补助的期望水平。教师对走教、送教的交流意愿强于定点支教，将区位向下流动教师的人事关系随迁至新学校不利于交流教师在基层学校安心教学，改善学校环境与工作条件能显著提升教师来校交流的意愿，降低教师对津贴补助的期望水平。基于这些发现，本文提出若干促进县域内义务教育均衡发展的政策性意见，包括推进区域内教师工资的统一标准化改革、建立基于因素法的交流教师津补贴制度、继续深化"局管校聘"人事改革。

关键词: 津贴补助, 中小学教师, 校际交流, 意愿

Abstract: Based on survey data from 278 schools in seven provinces in China, this paper, using binary logistic regression and generalized ordered logistic regression, investigates the factors influencing the willingness of primary and secondary school teachers to participate in inter-school exchange and their expectation level of subsidy. It also examines the actual effect of subsidy and housing benefits on the willingness of inter-school exchange. It's found that the current inter-school exchange of teachers is dominated by the same-level exchanges of school types and locations, and the coverage of subsidies and housing benefits is relatively low, while the expected amount of subsidy is about 30% of their salary, which means there is still a big gap. Subsidies and housing benefits can, to a certain extent, significantly enhance the teachers' willingness of inter-schools exchange, and there is a substitute relationship between subsidies and housing welfare. Teachers' willingness to participate in ‘hard exchange’ is stronger than that of "soft exchange". Transferring the personnel relationship of the downward-moving teachers to the targeted schools will significantly enhance their willingness of inter-schools move again. Improved school environment and working conditions has a significant positive impact on teachers' inter-schools exchange intention, but negative impact on teachers' expectation of subsidies. Based on the findings, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions on promoting the intra-county balanced development of compulsory education, including promoting the reform of teachers' unified salary standard, establishing a factor-based subsidy system, and deepening the reform of ‘Administration by Bureau, Recruitment by Schools’.

Key words: subsidies, primary and junior school teachers, inter-school exchange, intention

黄斌, 张琼文, 云如先. 货币性激励能提升中小学教师校际交流意愿吗？——基于7省市278所学校的调查数据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(6): 94-108.

Huang Bin, Zhang Qiongwen, Yun Ruxian. Can Monetary Incentive Increase Teachers' Inter-school Exchange Intention: A Survey Study of 278 Schools in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(6): 94-108.

参考文献

杜屏. (2018). 完善中小学教师工资制度和保障机制,推进高素质教师队伍建设. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (4), 40-42.
范国锋, 王浩文, 蓝雷宇.( 2015). 中小学教师流动意愿及其影响因素研究——基于湖北、江西、河南3省12县的调查. 教育与经济, (2), 62-66.
李玲, 韩玉梅.( 2011). 西方国家中小学教师流动的经验与启示. 比较教育研究, (11), 1-5.
孙刚成, 翟昕昕. (2016). 义务教育教师轮岗交流制度的困境及其对策. 教学与管理, (9), 21-24.
谭诤, 韩静溪, 周沙. (2016). 中小学教师流动意愿影响因素调查研究. 现代中小学教育, 32(12), 109-113.
汪传艳, 雷万鹏. (2017). 农村中小学教师收入"中部塌陷"现象的实证研究——基于全国7省21个县123所学校的调查. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 43(4), 88-94.
王艳玲, 李慧勤. (2017). 乡村教师流动及流失意愿的实证分析——基于云南省的调查. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 35(3), 134-141.
Antos, J. R., & Rosen, S. (1975). Discrimination in the market for public school teachers. Journal of Econometrics, 3(2), 123-150.
Bacolod, M. P. (2007). Do alternative opportunities matter? The role of female labor markets in the decline of teacher quality. Review of Economics & Statistics, 89(4), 737-751.
Borjas, G. J. (1999). The economic analysis of immigration. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1697-1760). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bradbury, K. L., Ladd, H. F., Perrault, M., Reschovsky, A., & Yinger, J. (1984). State aid to offset fiscal disparities across communities. National Tax Journal, 37, 151-170.
Chambers, J. (2010). Compensating differentials in teacher labor markets. In J. B. Dominic & P. J. McEwan (Eds.), Economics of Education (pp. 268-275). Oxford: Academic Press.
Chambers, J., & Fowler, J. W. (1995). Public School Teacher Cost Differences across the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dolton, P. (2010). Teacher supply. In J. B. Dominic & P. J. McEWan (Eds.), Economic of Education (pp. 251-259). Oxford: Elsevier.
Duncombe, W. D., & Yinger, J. (2008). Measurement of cost differentials. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy (pp. 238-256). New York: Routledge.
Dustmann, C., & Glitz, A. (2011). Migration and education. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 327-439). MA: North-Holland.
Goldhaber, D. (2008). Teachers Matter, but effective teacher quality policies are elusive. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy (pp. 146-165). New York: Routledge.
Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 1, pp. 1051-1078). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.
Ladd, H. F. (1994). Measuring disparities in the fiscal condition of local governments. In J. E. Anderson (Ed.), Fiscal Equalization for State and Local Government Finance (pp. 21-53). Connnecticut: Praeger.
Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2010). An overview of teacher labor markets. In D. J. Brewer & P. J. McEwan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 235-242). CA: Academic Press.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47-57.
Liu, X. (2016). Applied Ordinal Logistic Regression Using Stata. California: Sage.
Marvel, J., Lyter, D. M., Peltola, P., Strizek, G. A., Morton, B. A., & Rowland, R. (2007). Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2004-05 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. Washington D. C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
McEwan, P. J. (1999). Recruitment of rural teachers in developing countries: an economic analysis. Teaching & Teacher Education, 15(8), 849-859.
Murnane, R. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1990). The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: Evidence from North Carolina. Journal of Human Resources, 25(1), 106-124.
O'Connell, A. A. (2005). Logistic Regression Models for Ordinal Response Variables. California: Sage.
OECD. (2005). Teachers Matter Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers Pointers for policy development. Paris: OECD.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Rothstein, R., & Smith, J. (1997). Adjusting Oregon Education Expenditures for Regional Cost Differences: A Feasibility Study. Paper presented at the Confederation of Oregon School Administrators,Management Analysis & Planning Associates, L.L.C.
Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80-93.
Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review, 59(1), 138-148.
Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal, 113(485), F3-F33.

[1]	陈祥梅, 宁本涛. “双减”政策影响家长再生育意愿吗？——基于全国29个省份的调查[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(6): 75-85.
[2]	贺艳芳. 他们为什么愿意从事技能工作？——制度理论视角下德国青年技能投资意愿研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(4): 63-75.
[3]	宋萑, 吴健健. 我国中小学教师负担生成机制的质性研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(9): 16-37.
[4]	王艳玲. 乡村教师离职意愿影响因素的变与不变——基于《云南省乡村教师支持计划（2015—2020年）》实施前后的比较[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(9): 85-99.
[5]	宁德鹏, 何彤彤, 邓君雪, 曾雪. 创新创业教育对创业行为的影响机理研究——以创业能力和创业意愿为中介的大样本实证考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(2): 93-105.
[6]	柏宏权, 王姣阳, 沈书生. 区域教育管理者对在线教学融入常态教学的意愿及其影响因素研究——江苏省中小学在线教学调查研究报告之五[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(4): 77-89.
[7]	肖正德. 乡村振兴战略中乡村教师新乡贤角色担当意愿的相关影响因素分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(7): 92-106.
[8]	魏叶美, 范国睿. 教师参与学校治理意愿影响因素的实证研究——计划行为理论框架下的分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2021, 39(4): 73-82.
[9]	杜屏, 谢瑶. 农村中小学教师工资与流失意愿关系探究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2019, 37(1): 103-115+169.
[10]	杨福义. 我国中小学教师教育信息技术的应用状况及其影响因素——基于全国数据库的实证分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(6): 116-125+157.
[11]	王艳玲, 李慧勤. 乡村教师流动及流失意愿的实证分析——基于云南省的调查[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(3): 134-141+173.