华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)

华东师范大学学报(教育科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 111-129.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2025.12.009

• 教育法治 • 上一篇    

家长晒娃行为的公共话语分析与治理策略——基于大数据文本的实证研究

黄小莲, 邵弘凯, 严从根   

  1. 杭州师范大学经亨颐教育学院/中国教育现代化研究院，杭州 311121
  • 接受日期:2025-08-24 出版日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2025-11-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“学前课程改革循证决策提质研究”（BHA210134）。

Public Discourse Analysis and Governance Strategies of Parents’ Sharenting: Empirical Research Based on Big Data Texts

Xiaolian Huang, Hongkai Shao, Conggen Yan   

  1. Jing Hengyi School of Education, & Chinese Education Modernization Research Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
  • Accepted:2025-08-24 Online:2025-12-01 Published:2025-11-27

RichHTML

3

PDF

10

摘要：

数字化时代的到来使家长在自媒体平台的晒娃行为成为一种司空见惯的社会日常。本研究基于新浪微博中爬取到的15104条大数据文本，建构了家长晒娃行为公共话语的理论分析框架；同时也采用目的性抽样选取了10位对象进行有针对性的访谈，以受访者的情境化叙事来补充可能遗漏的细节。在儿童视域，晒娃行为表现为儿童身份的过界、儿童伦理的遗忘和儿童安全的警示；在家长视域，晒娃行为被理解为一份成长记录、一类感情媒介和一种集群效应；在公众视域，晒娃行为是一种隐性侵扰、一众人之常情和一类符号指代。基于私人与公众界域交融的社会语境，面对家长晒娃行为产生的话语冲突与现实问题，政府需要致力于儿童数字化生存的立法保障和儿童数字友好生态的环境监管；家长需要对儿童数字化权益边界有适度性把握并对儿童数字化权益阶段具有动态性认识；公众则需要提升自身的“公共空间意识”，协力维护儿童在公共空间中的健康成长。

关键词: 自媒体平台, 家长晒娃, 家庭教育, 公共空间, 公共话语

Abstract:

The arrival of the digital age has made it commonplace for parents to share their children on self media platforms. Based on 15,104 big data texts crawled from Sina Weibo, a theoretical analysis framework for the public discourse of parents’sharenting was constructed. At the same time, purposive sampling was used to select 10 individuals for targeted interviews, using situational narratives from the interviewees to supplement any details that may have been overlooked.The act of sharenting is manifested in the perspective of children as a boundary crossing of their identity, forgetting of their ethics, and a warning of their safety. From the perspective of parents, it is understood as a growth record, a type of emotional medium, and a cluster effect; In the public perspectivee, it is seen as an implicit intrusion, a common occurrence among people, and a type of symbolic representation. Based on the social context of the integration of private and public domains, facing the discourse conflicts and practical problems of parents’ sharenting, the government needs to be committed to legislative protection of children’s digital survival and environmental supervision of children’s digital friendly ecology. Parents need to have a moderate grasp of the boundaries of children’s digital rights and have a dynamic understanding of the stages of children’s digital rights. The public needs to enhance their awareness of public space and work together to maintain the healthy growth of children in public spaces.

Key words: self media platform, parents’ sharenting, family education, public space, public discourse